• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

适应总体冲击:新冠疫情危机对农村家庭的影响。

Adapting to an aggregate shock: The impact of the Covid-19 crisis on rural households.

作者信息

Mahmud Mahreen, Riley Emma

机构信息

University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

University of Washington, Seattle, WA USA.

出版信息

Rev Econ Househ. 2023;21(1):19-36. doi: 10.1007/s11150-022-09625-7. Epub 2022 Sep 8.

DOI:10.1007/s11150-022-09625-7
PMID:36097544
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9453704/
Abstract

We examine the response of rural Ugandan households to a large aggregate shock, the Covid-19 pandemic, during and one year after the first lockdown in March 2020. Using 6 rounds of phone surveys from 558 households in western Uganda, we find that household income recovery from the lockdown differs by whether households had a business pre-pandemic. After an initial sharp fall, the incomes of those without a business have recovered to pre-pandemic levels. However, the relatively better-off households with a business before the pandemic still have one-third lower income, due to sustained closure of businesses even after the end of the first lockdown restrictions. Additionally, business-owning households have 30% lower wealth one-year into the pandemic, driven by 44% lower assets, 45% drop in savings, and a 15 fold increase in net-borrowing, suggesting long-term damage. Our findings point to the need to support households who face dwindling finances to fall back on.

摘要

我们研究了乌干达农村家庭对2020年3月首次封锁期间及之后一年内出现的重大总体冲击——新冠疫情的应对情况。通过对乌干达西部558户家庭进行6轮电话调查,我们发现,家庭收入从封锁中恢复的情况因家庭在疫情前是否拥有生意而有所不同。在经历最初的大幅下降后,没有生意的家庭的收入已恢复到疫情前的水平。然而,疫情前相对富裕的有生意的家庭,即使在首次封锁限制结束后,由于企业持续关闭,收入仍比疫情前低三分之一。此外,在疫情爆发一年后,拥有企业的家庭财富减少了30%,其资产减少了44%,储蓄下降了45%,净借款增加了15倍,这表明造成了长期损害。我们的研究结果表明,需要支持那些面临资金减少而无以为继的家庭。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9236/9453704/cc95040d4383/11150_2022_9625_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9236/9453704/ddb7e508ae58/11150_2022_9625_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9236/9453704/80a447297efa/11150_2022_9625_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9236/9453704/cc95040d4383/11150_2022_9625_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9236/9453704/ddb7e508ae58/11150_2022_9625_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9236/9453704/80a447297efa/11150_2022_9625_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9236/9453704/cc95040d4383/11150_2022_9625_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Adapting to an aggregate shock: The impact of the Covid-19 crisis on rural households.适应总体冲击:新冠疫情危机对农村家庭的影响。
Rev Econ Househ. 2023;21(1):19-36. doi: 10.1007/s11150-022-09625-7. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
2
Household response to an extreme shock: Evidence on the immediate impact of the Covid-19 lockdown on economic outcomes and well-being in rural Uganda.家庭对极端冲击的反应:关于新冠疫情封锁对乌干达农村地区经济成果和福祉的直接影响的证据。
World Dev. 2021 Apr;140:105318. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105318. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
3
COVID-19 Lockdown and Exposure of Households to Food Insecurity in Uganda: Insights from a National High Frequency Phone Survey.新冠疫情封锁与乌干达家庭面临粮食不安全状况:来自全国高频电话调查的见解
Eur J Dev Res. 2022;34(6):3050-3075. doi: 10.1057/s41287-022-00510-8. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
4
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the poor: Insights from the Hrishipara diaries.新冠疫情对贫困人口的影响:来自赫里希帕拉日记的见解。
World Dev. 2022 Jan;149:105689. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105689. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
5
Income inequality and entrepreneurship: Lessons from the 2020 COVID-19 recession.收入不平等与创业精神:2020年新冠疫情衰退的教训
J Bank Financ. 2023 Apr;149:106779. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2023.106779. Epub 2023 Jan 15.
6
Food Consumption and Food Security during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Addis Ababa.亚的斯亚贝巴在2019年冠状病毒病大流行期间的食物消费与粮食安全
Am J Agric Econ. 2021 May;103(3):772-789. doi: 10.1111/ajae.12206. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
7
Covid-19-induced Shocks, Access to Basic Needs and Coping Strategies.新冠疫情引发的冲击、基本需求的获取与应对策略
Eur J Dev Res. 2023 Apr 29:1-22. doi: 10.1057/s41287-023-00584-y.
8
Developing a Paradigm Model for Resilience of Rural Entrepreneurial Businesses in Dealing With the COVID-19 Crisis; Application of Grounded Theory in Western of Iran.发展农村创业企业应对 COVID-19 危机的韧性范式模型;扎根理论在伊朗西部的应用。
Front Public Health. 2022 Feb 25;10:833909. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.833909. eCollection 2022.
9
COVID-19 and food security: Panel data evidence from Nigeria.新冠疫情与粮食安全:来自尼日利亚的面板数据证据
Food Policy. 2021 May;101:102099. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102099. Epub 2021 May 16.
10
Lockdown, Earnings Losses and Household Asset Buffers in Europe.欧洲的封锁措施、收入损失与家庭资产缓冲
Rev Income Wealth. 2022 Jun;68(2):428-470. doi: 10.1111/roiw.12594. Epub 2022 May 23.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Agricultural, Livestock, Poultry and Fish Sectors: COVID-19 Impact on Agriculture, Livestock, Poultry and Fish Sectors.新冠疫情对农业、畜牧业、家禽业和渔业的影响:新冠疫情对农业、畜牧业、家禽业和渔业的影响。
Vet Med Int. 2024 Oct 29;2024:5540056. doi: 10.1155/2024/5540056. eCollection 2024.
2
The effects of COVID-19 on agriculture supply chain, food security, and environment: a review.新冠疫情对农业供应链、粮食安全和环境的影响:综述。
PeerJ. 2024 Apr 23;12:e17281. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17281. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
COVID-19 market disruptions and food security: Evidence from households in rural Liberia and Malawi.COVID-19 市场动荡与粮食安全:来自利比里亚和马拉维农村家庭的证据。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 8;17(8):e0271488. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271488. eCollection 2022.
2
Cash transfers as a response to COVID-19: Experimental evidence from Kenya.现金转移支付作为对新冠疫情的应对措施:来自肯尼亚的实验证据。
J Dev Econ. 2022 Sep;158:102929. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2022.102929. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
3
Estimating excess mortality due to the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic analysis of COVID-19-related mortality, 2020-21.
估算2019冠状病毒病大流行造成的超额死亡率:2020 - 2021年与2019冠状病毒病相关死亡率的系统分析
Lancet. 2022 Apr 16;399(10334):1513-1536. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02796-3. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
4
Women's well-being during a pandemic and its containment.疫情期间及防控措施下女性的福祉。
J Dev Econ. 2022 May;156:102839. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2022.102839. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
5
Household response to an extreme shock: Evidence on the immediate impact of the Covid-19 lockdown on economic outcomes and well-being in rural Uganda.家庭对极端冲击的反应:关于新冠疫情封锁对乌干达农村地区经济成果和福祉的直接影响的证据。
World Dev. 2021 Apr;140:105318. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105318. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
6
The many ways COVID-19 affects households: consumption, time, and health outcomes.新冠病毒病影响家庭的多种方式:消费、时间和健康结果。
Rev Econ Househ. 2021;19(2):281-289. doi: 10.1007/s11150-021-09563-w. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
7
Falling living standards during the COVID-19 crisis: Quantitative evidence from nine developing countries.新冠疫情危机期间生活水平下降:来自九个发展中国家的定量证据。
Sci Adv. 2021 Feb 5;7(6). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abe0997. Print 2021 Feb.
8
Consumption and geographic mobility in pandemic times. Evidence from Mexico.疫情时期的消费与地理流动性。来自墨西哥的证据。
Rev Econ Househ. 2021;19(2):353-371. doi: 10.1007/s11150-020-09539-2. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
9
COVID-19 implications on household income and food security in Kenya and Uganda: Findings from a rapid assessment.新冠疫情对肯尼亚和乌干达家庭收入与粮食安全的影响:快速评估结果
World Dev. 2021 Jan;137:105199. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105199. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
10
Risk propensity differences between entrepreneurs and managers: a meta-analytic review.企业家与管理者之间的风险倾向差异:一项元分析综述
J Appl Psychol. 2001 Feb;86(1):145-53. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.145.