Mahmud Mahreen, Riley Emma
University of Exeter, United Kingdom.
University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
World Dev. 2021 Apr;140:105318. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105318. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
We provide evidence on the economic and well-being impact of the Covid-19 lockdown on a sample of households in rural Uganda. Our sample consists of 1,277 households randomly drawn from 114 rural villages in western Uganda and surveyed in-person in early March 2020, just before the lockdown. We followed up with this sample in May 2020, reaching over 85% of them by phone. We find a large decline of 60% in household non-farm income due to household enterprise profits and labour income being almost wiped-out post the lockdown. Households respond to this loss of income in three key ways. One, there is a 40% decrease in food expenditure per adult equivalent. Two, they use up nearly 50% of their savings and borrow more, but have not yet liquidated their fixed assets or sold livestock. Three, they increase total household labour supply to household farm and livestock, more than making up for the decline in supply to enterprises and labour outside the household. We find a decrease in well-being as a result of this: there is an increase in the likelihood of missing a meal, a decline in reported satisfaction with quality of life, a higher likelihood of having a major argument with their spouse and an increase in perceived frequency of intimate partner violence against women in the village. The negative effects of the lockdown are greater for households that were wealthier at baseline, since these households were more reliant on enterprise and salaried income. These results were one of the first to show a large negative impact of the lockdown for a rural population. Our findings are important to policy makers in Uganda and other developing countries as they suggest income and consumption support is needed for rural households.
我们提供了关于新冠疫情封锁对乌干达农村家庭样本的经济和福祉影响的证据。我们的样本由从乌干达西部114个乡村随机抽取的1277户家庭组成,并于2020年3月初,即封锁前进行了实地调查。2020年5月,我们对该样本进行了跟进,通过电话联系到了其中超过85%的家庭。我们发现,由于家庭企业利润和劳动收入在封锁后几乎归零,家庭非农业收入大幅下降了60%。家庭通过三种关键方式应对收入损失。其一,人均食品支出减少了40%。其二,他们动用了近50%的储蓄并增加借贷,但尚未清算固定资产或出售牲畜。其三,他们增加了家庭农场和畜牧业的总劳动力供给,足以弥补企业和家庭外部劳动力供给的下降。我们发现,由此导致了福祉下降:错过一顿饭的可能性增加,对生活质量的满意度下降,与配偶发生重大争吵的可能性更高,以及村里感知到的亲密伴侣对妇女暴力行为的频率增加。封锁对基线时较富裕的家庭负面影响更大,因为这些家庭更依赖企业和薪资收入。这些结果是最早表明封锁对农村人口有重大负面影响的结果之一。我们的研究结果对乌干达和其他发展中国家的政策制定者很重要,因为它们表明农村家庭需要收入和消费支持。