Department of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Psychol Health. 2024 Jul;39(7):895-913. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2022.2121962. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
This content analysis study explored how online news media communicates and frames vaccination rates and herd immunity (the effect where enough people are immune, the virus is contained).
We analyzed 160 vaccination-related news stories by nine highest-trafficked news websites in Serbia, published July-December 2017, around the start of the measles outbreak. We coded both the news story as a whole and every vaccination-rate mention ( = 339).
News stories framed current vaccination rates and changes in them in a predominantly negative way (175/241 and 67/98 mentions, respectively) (e.g., "only 50% vaccinated", "fewer parents vaccinating their children"), especially when referring to the measles vaccine (202/262 mentions). A total of 23/86 of news stories mentioning vaccination rates did not provide any numerical values. Reference groups for vaccination rates were rarely specified. Out of the 32 news stories mentioning herd immunity, 11 explained the effect.
Even routine communication of vaccination rates can be biased through negative frames and imprecise descriptions. Lamenting low immunization rates could activate a negative descriptive social norm ("many people are not getting vaccinated"), which may be especially ill-advised in the absence of an explanation of the social benefit of achieving herd immunity through vaccination.
本内容分析研究探讨了在线新闻媒体如何传播和构建疫苗接种率和群体免疫(足够多的人具有免疫力,病毒就会被遏制)的概念。
我们分析了塞尔维亚九家流量最高的新闻网站在 2017 年 7 月至 12 月间发表的 160 篇与疫苗接种相关的新闻报道,时值麻疹疫情爆发前夕。我们对整篇新闻报道和每一处提到疫苗接种率的地方( = 339)进行了编码。
新闻报道以负面的方式构建了当前的疫苗接种率及其变化(175/241 和 67/98 的提及率,分别)(例如,“只有 50%接种了疫苗”,“越来越少的父母给孩子接种疫苗”),尤其是在提到麻疹疫苗时(202/262 的提及率)。共有 23/86 提到疫苗接种率的新闻报道未提供任何具体数值。疫苗接种率的参考群体很少被明确指出。在提到群体免疫的 32 篇新闻报道中,有 11 篇解释了其作用。
即使是常规的疫苗接种率报道也可能因为负面框架和不精确的描述而产生偏差。对低免疫率的哀叹可能会激活一种负面的描述性社会规范(“很多人没有接种疫苗”),而在没有解释通过接种疫苗实现群体免疫的社会效益的情况下,这种做法尤其不明智。