• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

建模在孕产妇和儿童健康项目评估中的作用:使用生存工具来帮助回答核心评估问题。

The role of modeling in evaluation of maternal and child health programs: using the lives saved tool to help answer core evaluation questions.

机构信息

Department of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Glob Health Action. 2022 Jun 30;15(sup1):2006421. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2021.2006421.

DOI:10.1080/16549716.2021.2006421
PMID:36098950
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9481079/
Abstract

This paper explains how The Lives Saved Tool (LiST), a computer-based model that estimates the impact of scaling up interventions on stillbirths, maternal, neonatal and child health, can contribute to evaluations of programs being delivered at scale to improve maternal and child health. LiST can be used to estimate the impact of a program in advance, allowing planners to refine, streamline and set appropriate program targets. LiST can also be used to estimate the impact of a program, which is particularly useful given the high costs of measuring changes in population health. Finally, LiST can be used to estimate the relative contributions of different interventions or sets of interventions within programs that are found to have a positive impact. The latest version of LiST allows users to manipulate both utilization and quality of service to generate estimates of effective coverage. In addition, a new, web-based version of LiST is now available, with a simpler and more streamlined interface designed to increase accessibility to beginning users. LiST modeling can help program planners, evaluators and funders respond to core evaluation questions related to program design and impact, providing evidence to support decisions about how best to use available resources to save the lives of women and children.

摘要

本文阐述了基于计算机的模型——生命挽救工具(LiST)如何为评估大规模实施的项目对母婴健康的影响做出贡献,该模型可用于估计扩大干预措施对死产、母婴和儿童健康的影响。LiST 可用于提前估计项目的影响,使规划人员能够改进、简化和设定适当的项目目标。LiST 还可用于估计项目的影响,鉴于衡量人口健康变化的成本高昂,这一点尤其有用。最后,LiST 可用于估计在被发现具有积极影响的项目中,不同干预措施或干预措施组合的相对贡献。LiST 的最新版本允许用户操纵利用率和服务质量,以生成有效覆盖范围的估计值。此外,现在还提供了一个新的基于网络的 LiST 版本,其界面更简单、更精简,旨在提高新手用户的可访问性。LiST 模型可以帮助项目规划者、评估者和资助者回答与项目设计和影响相关的核心评估问题,提供证据支持有关如何最好地利用可用资源来拯救妇女和儿童生命的决策。

相似文献

1
The role of modeling in evaluation of maternal and child health programs: using the lives saved tool to help answer core evaluation questions.建模在孕产妇和儿童健康项目评估中的作用:使用生存工具来帮助回答核心评估问题。
Glob Health Action. 2022 Jun 30;15(sup1):2006421. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2021.2006421.
2
Expanding the population coverage of evidence-based interventions with community health workers to save the lives of mothers and children: an analysis of potential global impact using the Lives Saved Tool (LiST).扩大社区卫生工作者基于证据的干预措施的人群覆盖范围以拯救母婴生命:使用挽救生命工具(LiST)对潜在全球影响的分析
J Glob Health. 2017 Dec;7(2):020401. doi: 10.7189/jogh.07.020401.
3
Strategic planning for saving the lives of mothers, newborns and children and preventing stillbirths in KwaZulu-Natal province South Africa: modelling using the Lives Saved Tool (LiST).南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省拯救母婴和预防死产的战略规划:使用生存工具(LiST)进行建模。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jan 19;16:49. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2661-x.
4
A method for estimating maternal and newborn lives saved from health-related investments funded by the UK government Department for International Development using the Lives Saved Tool.一种使用“挽救生命工具”来估算由英国政府国际发展部资助的与健康相关投资所挽救的孕产妇和新生儿生命数量的方法。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Nov 7;17(Suppl 4):779. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4748-z.
5
Projecting the lives saved by continuing the historical scale-up of child and maternal health interventions in Mozambique until 2030.预测在 2030 年之前继续扩大莫桑比克儿童和孕产妇健康干预措施的历史规模所带来的生命拯救。
J Glob Health. 2019 Jun;9(1):011102. doi: 10.7189/jogh.09.011102.
6
Lives Saved Tool (LiST) costing: a module to examine costs and prioritize interventions.挽救生命工具(LiST)成本核算:一个用于检查成本并确定干预措施优先级的模块。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Nov 7;17(Suppl 4):782. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4738-1.
7
An analysis of three levels of scaled-up coverage for 28 interventions to avert stillbirths and maternal, newborn and child mortality in 27 countries in Latin America and the Caribbean with the Lives Saved Tool (LiST).运用挽救生命工具(LiST)对拉丁美洲和加勒比地区27个国家的28项预防死产及孕产妇、新生儿和儿童死亡干预措施的三个扩大覆盖水平进行分析。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jul 22;16:613. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3238-z.
8
Intervention heroes of Mozambique from 1997 to 2015: estimates of maternal and child lives saved using the Lives Saved Tool.1997 年至 2015 年莫桑比克的干预措施英雄:使用拯救生命工具估计挽救的母婴生命数。
J Glob Health. 2018 Dec;8(2):021202. doi: 10.7189/jogh.08.021201.
9
Modelling stillbirth mortality reduction with the Lives Saved Tool.使用“挽救生命工具”对死产死亡率降低情况进行建模。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Nov 7;17(Suppl 4):784. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4742-5.
10
Progress and priorities for reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health in Kenya: a Countdown to 2015 country case study.肯尼亚生殖、孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康方面的进展和优先事项:2015 倒计时国家案例研究。
Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Aug;5(8):e782-e795. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30246-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Building coherent monitoring and evaluation plans with the Evaluation Planning Tool for global health.利用全球卫生评估规划工具制定连贯的监测和评估计划。
Glob Health Action. 2022 Jun 30;15(sup1):2067396. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2022.2067396.
2
There is no right time for accountability for women's, children's and adolescents' health.对妇女、儿童和青少年的健康负责,不存在所谓合适的时机。
Glob Health Action. 2022 Jun 30;15(sup1):2067399. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2022.2067399.
3
Strengthening effectiveness evaluations to improve programs for women, children and adolescents.加强效果评估,改进妇女、儿童和青少年项目。
Glob Health Action. 2022 Jun 30;15(sup1):2006423. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2021.2006423.

本文引用的文献

1
The RADAR coverage tool: developing a toolkit for rigorous household surveys for reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health & nutrition indicators.RADAR 覆盖工具:为生殖、孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康与营养指标制定严格的家庭调查工具包。
Glob Health Action. 2022 Jun 30;15(sup1):2006419. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2021.2006419.
2
Strengthening effectiveness evaluations to improve programs for women, children and adolescents.加强效果评估,改进妇女、儿童和青少年项目。
Glob Health Action. 2022 Jun 30;15(sup1):2006423. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2021.2006423.
3
Quality improvement in maternal and newborn healthcare: lessons from programmes supported by the German development organisation in Africa and Asia.孕产妇和新生儿保健领域的质量改进:来自德国发展组织在非洲和亚洲所支持项目的经验教训。
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Sep 6;4(5):e001562. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001562. eCollection 2019.
4
National, regional, and global levels and trends in neonatal mortality between 1990 and 2017, with scenario-based projections to 2030: a systematic analysis.1990 年至 2017 年期间,国家、地区和全球各级以及新生儿死亡率的趋势,并基于情景预测到 2030 年:系统分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Jun;7(6):e710-e720. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30163-9.
5
Linking household and health facility surveys to assess obstetric service availability, readiness and coverage: evidence from 17 low- and middle-income countries.将家庭调查和卫生机构调查相联系,以评估产科服务的可及性、准备情况和覆盖范围:来自 17 个低收入和中等收入国家的证据。
J Glob Health. 2018 Jun;8(1):010603. doi: 10.7189/jogh.08.010603.
6
Gaps in the implementation of antenatal syphilis detection and treatment in health facilities across sub-Saharan Africa.撒哈拉以南非洲各卫生机构在实施产前梅毒检测和治疗方面存在差距。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 1;13(6):e0198622. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198622. eCollection 2018.
7
Improving coverage measurement for reproductive, maternal, neonatal and child health: gaps and opportunities.提高生殖、孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康覆盖度的测量:差距与机遇。
J Glob Health. 2017 Jun;7(1):010801. doi: 10.7189/jogh.07.010801.
8
Linking household and facility data for better coverage measures in reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health care: systematic review.关联家庭与机构数据以改善生殖、孕产妇、新生儿和儿童保健的覆盖范围衡量指标:系统评价
J Glob Health. 2016 Dec;6(2):020501. doi: 10.7189/jogh.06.020501.
9
Tanzania's countdown to 2015: an analysis of two decades of progress and gaps for reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health, to inform priorities for post-2015.坦桑尼亚迈向 2015 年倒计时:分析过去二十年在生殖、孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康方面的进展和差距,为 2015 年后的重点工作提供信息。
Lancet Glob Health. 2015 Jul;3(7):e396-409. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00059-5.
10
Mathematical models in the evaluation of health programmes.健康规划评估中的数学模型。
Lancet. 2011 Aug 6;378(9790):515-25. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61505-X. Epub 2011 Apr 8.