Corsini Christian, Boeri Luca, Candela Luigi, Pozzi Edoardo, Belladelli Federico, Capogrosso Paolo, Fallara Giuseppe, Schifano Nicolò, Cignoli Daniele, Ventimiglia Eugenio, D'Arma Alessia, Alfano Massimo, Montorsi Francesco, Salonia Andrea
Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
World J Mens Health. 2023 Apr;41(2):354-362. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.220069. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
Overall, male factor infertility (MFI) accounts for up to 50% of etiologies of couple's infertility, with almost 30% of MFI cases being idiopathic in nature. Idiopathic MFI does not support a tailored treatment work-up in clinical practice. To investigate rates of and characteristics of men presenting for idiopathic unexplained primary infertility as compared with same-ethnicity, age-comparable fertile men.
Demographic, clinical and laboratory data from 3,098 primary infertile men consecutively evaluated were analyzed and compared with those of 103 fertile controls. Idiopathic male infertility (IMI) was defined for abnormality at semen analysis with no previous history of diseases affecting fertility and normal findings on physical examination and genetic and laboratory testing. Unexplained male infertility (UMI) was defined as infertility of unknown origin with completely normal findings at semen analysis. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models tested the association between clinical variables and idiopathic infertility status.
Overall, 570 (18.5%) and 154 (5.0%) patients depicted criteria suggestive for either IMI or UMI, respectively. Groups were similar in terms of age, BMI, CCI, recreational habits, hormonal milieu, and sperm DNA fragmentation indexes. Conversely, testicular volume was lower in IMI (p<0.001). Vitamin D3 levels were lower in IMI UMI fertile controls (p=0.01). At multivariable logistic regression analysis only vitamin D3 deficiency (OR, 9.67; p=0.03) was associated with IMI. Characteristics suggestive for IMI versus UMI were observed in almost 20% and 5% of men, respectively. Overall, clinical differences between groups were slightly significant and certainly not supportive of a tailored management work-up.
Current findings further support the urgent need of a more detailed and comprehensive assessment of infertile men to better tailoring their management work-up in the everyday clinical setting.
总体而言,男性因素不育(MFI)占夫妻不育病因的比例高达50%,其中近30%的MFI病例本质上是特发性的。在临床实践中,特发性MFI不支持进行针对性的治疗检查。旨在调查与同种族、年龄相仿的可育男性相比,特发性不明原因原发性不育男性的就诊率及特征。
对连续评估的3098例原发性不育男性的人口统计学、临床和实验室数据进行分析,并与103例可育对照者的数据进行比较。特发性男性不育(IMI)定义为精液分析异常,既往无影响生育的疾病史,体格检查、基因检测和实验室检查结果正常。不明原因男性不育(UMI)定义为病因不明的不育,精液分析结果完全正常。描述性统计和逻辑回归模型检验了临床变量与特发性不育状态之间的关联。
总体而言,分别有570例(18.5%)和154例(5.0%)患者符合IMI或UMI的标准。两组在年龄、体重指数、合并症指数、娱乐习惯、激素环境和精子DNA碎片指数方面相似。相反,IMI组的睾丸体积较小(p<0.001)。IMI组和UMI组的维生素D3水平均低于可育对照组(p=0.01)。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,只有维生素D3缺乏(比值比,9.67;p=0.03)与IMI相关。分别在近20%和5%的男性中观察到提示IMI和UMI的特征。总体而言,各组之间的临床差异略有显著性,当然不支持进行针对性的管理检查。
目前的研究结果进一步支持迫切需要对不育男性进行更详细、全面的评估,以便在日常临床环境中更好地制定其管理检查方案。