• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

居家护理中照护者的姑息治疗管理:在对话圈中的理论验证。

Palliative care management by caregivers in home care: theoretical validation in a conversation circle.

机构信息

Faculdade de Ciências Médicas e da Saúde de Juiz de Fora. Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora. Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

出版信息

Rev Bras Enferm. 2022 Sep 9;75(6):e20210737. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0737. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0737
PMID:36102471
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9728829/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

to present the validation process of a Grounded Theory on the management of palliative care at home by a caregiver of a family member who experiences a death/dying process.

METHODS

a qualitative, explanatory research, which validated a theoretical matrix through a conversation circle containing 15 family caregivers and nine healthcare professionals, in December 2018.

RESULTS

forty-six propositions were validated regarding family caregivers' contextual, causal, intervening conditions, consequences and action strategies to deal with the dying and death process of a family member. Conversation circles encouraged dialogue and (re)signification of the senses and knowledge of those involved, proving to be a way of educating and promoting the exercise of citizenship by participants.

FINAL CONSIDERATIONS

the conversation circle made it possible for participants to interact and share information and experiences regarding home care for palliative patients and their families.

摘要

目的

介绍通过经历死亡/临终过程的家庭成员的护理人员,对家庭姑息治疗管理的扎根理论进行验证的过程。

方法

这是一项定性的解释性研究,于 2018 年 12 月通过包含 15 名家庭护理人员和 9 名医疗保健专业人员的对话圈,对理论矩阵进行了验证。

结果

验证了 46 个关于家庭护理人员处理家庭成员临终和死亡过程的情境、因果、干预条件、后果和行动策略的命题。对话圈鼓励了参与人员的对话和(重新)意义赋予,证明了这是一种通过参与者进行教育和促进公民权行使的方式。

最终考虑

对话圈使参与者能够互动,分享有关姑息治疗患者及其家庭的家庭护理信息和经验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d01/9728829/d625718bf3b3/0034-7167-reben-75-06-e20210737-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d01/9728829/d625718bf3b3/0034-7167-reben-75-06-e20210737-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d01/9728829/d625718bf3b3/0034-7167-reben-75-06-e20210737-gf01.jpg

相似文献

1
Palliative care management by caregivers in home care: theoretical validation in a conversation circle.居家护理中照护者的姑息治疗管理:在对话圈中的理论验证。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2022 Sep 9;75(6):e20210737. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0737. eCollection 2022.
2
Family caregivers' preferences for support when caring for a family member with cancer in late palliative phase who wish to die at home - a grounded theory study.晚期临终阶段希望在家中离世的癌症患者的家庭照护者在照护过程中对支持的偏好 - 扎根理论研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Jan 11;23(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01350-5.
3
"Going Home [Is] Just a Feel-Good Idea With No Structure": A Qualitative Exploration of Patient and Family Caregiver Needs When Transitioning From Hospital to Home in Palliative Care.“回家只是一种没有结构的感觉良好的想法”:姑息治疗中从医院过渡到家庭时患者和家庭照顾者需求的定性探索。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Sep;62(3):e9-e19. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.02.026. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
4
Caregiver exposure to critical events and distress in home-based palliative care in Germany a cross-sectional study using the Stressful Caregiving Adult Reactions to Experiences of Dying (SCARED) scale.德国基于家庭的姑息治疗中照顾者暴露于危急事件和痛苦:使用有濒死体验的压力性照顾者成人反应量表(SCARED)的横断面研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Jan 24;18(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0395-8.
5
How should we talk about palliative care, death and dying? A qualitative study exploring perspectives from caregivers of people with advanced cancer.我们应该如何谈论姑息治疗、死亡和临终?一项探索晚期癌症患者照顾者观点的定性研究。
Palliat Med. 2018 Apr;32(4):861-869. doi: 10.1177/0269216317746584. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
6
The Life Experiences Among Primary Family Caregivers of Home-Based Palliative Care.居家姑息治疗主要家庭照顾者的生活经历
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2020 Oct;37(10):816-822. doi: 10.1177/1049909120907601. Epub 2020 Mar 1.
7
Home palliative care works: but how? A meta-ethnography of the experiences of patients and family caregivers.居家姑息治疗有效:但如何起效?一项关于患者及家庭照护者经历的元民族志研究。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2017 Dec;7(4):0. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2016-001141. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
8
Increasing preparedness for caregiving and death in family caregivers of patients with severe illness who are cared for at home - study protocol for a web-based intervention.提高居家重病患者家属对护理和死亡的准备度 - 一项基于网络的干预研究方案。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Mar 17;19(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-0530-6.
9
"I didn't want to be in charge and yet I was": Bereaved caregivers' accounts of providing home care for family members with advanced cancer.“我不想负责,但我却成了负责人”:丧亲护理者照顾晚期癌症家庭成员的叙述。
Psychooncology. 2018 Apr;27(4):1229-1236. doi: 10.1002/pon.4657. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
10
The effectivness of a strengths-oriented therapeutic conversation intervention on perceived support, well-being and burden among family caregivers in palliative home-care.一项以优势为导向的治疗性对话干预措施对姑息性家庭护理中家庭照顾者的感知支持、幸福感和负担的有效性。
J Adv Nurs. 2019 Nov;75(11):3018-3031. doi: 10.1111/jan.14089. Epub 2019 Aug 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Practices used by a home care team: implications for caregivers.
Rev Bras Enferm. 2021 Apr 16;74(2):e20190794. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2019-0794. eCollection 2021.
2
Grounded Theory methodological aspects in Brazilian nursing thesis.巴西护理学论文中的扎根理论方法论方面
Rev Bras Enferm. 2020;73(6):e20190274. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2019-0274. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
3
A Review of the Quality Indicators of Rigor in Qualitative Research.一项关于定性研究严谨性质量指标的综述。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Jan;84(1):7120. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7120.
4
Validation in grounded theory: conversation circles as a methodological strategy.扎根理论中的验证:以对话圈作为一种方法论策略。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2018 Nov-Dec;71(6):3121-3126. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0488.
5
Discriminating among grounded theory approaches.区分扎根理论方法。
Nurs Inq. 2019 Jan;26(1):e12261. doi: 10.1111/nin.12261. Epub 2018 Aug 19.
6
Family caregiver of older adults and Cultural Care in Nursing care.老年人的家庭照顾者与护理中的文化关怀。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2018 May;71(3):959-966. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0105.
7
[Circumstances and consequences of care: characterization of the family caregiver in palliative care].[照护的情况与后果:姑息治疗中家庭照护者的特征]
Cien Saude Colet. 2018 Apr;23(4):1105-1117. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232018234.12902016.
8
Data analysis: comparison between the different methodological perspectives of the Grounded Theory.数据分析:扎根理论不同方法论视角之间的比较
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2018;52:e03303. doi: 10.1590/s1980-220x2017021803303. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
9
The qualitative orientation in medical education research.医学教育研究中的质性取向
Korean J Med Educ. 2017 Jun;29(2):61-71. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2017.53. Epub 2017 May 29.
10
Validity, reliability, and generalizability in qualitative research.定性研究中的效度、信度和可推广性。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2015 Jul-Sep;4(3):324-7. doi: 10.4103/2249-4863.161306.