• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

主动脉瓣狭窄治疗中的性别差异及相关结局:基于全国住院患者样本的分析

Sex Disparities in the Treatment of Aortic Stenosis and Related Outcomes: An Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample.

作者信息

Erinne Ikenna, Hiltner Emily, Bhasin Varun, Parikh Nisharg, Tangel Richard, Chen Chunguang, Russo Mark J, Kassotis John, Sethi Ankur

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA,

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.

出版信息

Cardiology. 2022;147(5-6):557-565. doi: 10.1159/000526255. Epub 2022 Sep 14.

DOI:10.1159/000526255
PMID:36103808
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The impact of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) on sex disparities has not been well established. This study sought to examine the impact of sex on outcomes following aortic valve replacement (AVR) for aortic stenosis (AS) in the era of routine TAVR.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the National Inpatient Sample (2009-18) to study AS visits for all AVR and in-hospital outcomes as a function of sex. Survey estimation commands were used to provide national estimates.

RESULTS

There were an estimated 431,344 surgical AVR (SAVR) and 189,137 TAVR inpatient visits. Mortality was higher in women after SAVR (3.8% ± 0.1 vs. 2.7% ± 0.07, p < 0.001) and TAVR (2.4% ± 0.1 vs. 1.7% ± 0.1, p < 0.001) compared to men. Female patients undergoing SAVR had higher rates of permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation, stroke, and bleeding (5.9% ± 0.1 vs. 5% ± 0.1, 2.8% ± 0.1 vs. 2.3% ± 0.07, and 37.8% ± 0.8 vs. 29.8% ± 0.6; p < 0.001, respectively) but lower rates of acute kidney injury (AKI) (16.4% ± 0.3 vs. 20.3% ± 0.3, p < 0.001). Women undergoing TAVR had higher rates of stroke and bleeding (2.4% ± 0.1 vs. 1.6% ± 0.09 and 28.7% ± 0.6 vs. 22% ± 0.5; p < 0.001, respectively) but lower rates of PPM and AKI (9.5% ± 0.3 vs. 10.7% ± 0.2 and 11.3% ± 0.3 vs. 13.4% ± 0.3; p < 0.001, respectively). Compared with isolated SAVR, isolated TAVR was associated with lower mortality in women during 2016-18, both after multivariable adjustment (OR = 0.40; 95% CI, 0.27-0.60) and propensity matching (mean difference 0.66% ± 0.2); however, there was no difference in men.

CONCLUSION

Although women continue to have higher in-hospital mortality following both TAVR and SAVR as compared to men, TAVR is associated with a lower in-hospital mortality in women compared to SAVR. Thus, TAVR may represent a potential intervention to narrow the sex-based disparities in the management of AS.

摘要

引言

经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)对性别差异的影响尚未完全明确。本研究旨在探讨在常规TAVR时代,性别对主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者行主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)后预后的影响。

方法

我们对国家住院患者样本(2009 - 2018年)进行了横断面分析,以研究所有AVR手术中因AS就诊的情况以及住院结局与性别的关系。使用调查估计命令来提供全国性估计数据。

结果

据估计,有431,344例外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)和189,137例TAVR住院病例。与男性相比,女性在SAVR(3.8% ± 0.1 vs. 2.7% ± 0.07,p < 0.001)和TAVR(2.4% ± 0.1 vs. 1.7% ± 0.1,p < 0.001)后的死亡率更高。接受SAVR的女性患者永久性起搏器(PPM)植入率、中风发生率和出血率更高(分别为5.9% ± 0.1 vs. 5% ± 0.1,2.8% ± 0.1 vs. 2.3% ± 0.07,以及37.8% ± 0.8 vs. 29.8% ± 0.6;p均< 0.001),但急性肾损伤(AKI)发生率更低(16.4% ± 0.3 vs. 20.3% ± 0.3,p < 0.001)。接受TAVR的女性中风和出血发生率更高(分别为2.4% ± 0.1 vs. 1.6% ± 0.09和28.7% ± 0.6 vs. 22% ± 0.5;p均< 0.001),但PPM和AKI发生率更低(分别为9.5% ± 0.3 vs. 10.7% ± 0.2和11.3% ± 0.3 vs. 13.4% ± 0.3;p均< 0.001)。与单纯SAVR相比,2016 - 2018年期间,单纯TAVR在多变量调整后(OR = 0.40;95% CI,0.27 - 0.60)以及倾向匹配后(平均差异0.66% ± 0.2),女性死亡率更低;然而,男性中无差异。

结论

尽管与男性相比,女性在TAVR和SAVR后住院死亡率仍然更高,但与SAVR相比,TAVR与女性较低的住院死亡率相关。因此,TAVR可能是缩小AS治疗中基于性别的差异的一种潜在干预措施。

相似文献

1
Sex Disparities in the Treatment of Aortic Stenosis and Related Outcomes: An Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample.主动脉瓣狭窄治疗中的性别差异及相关结局:基于全国住院患者样本的分析
Cardiology. 2022;147(5-6):557-565. doi: 10.1159/000526255. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
2
Acute kidney injury after aortic valve replacement in a nationally representative cohort in the USA.美国全国代表性队列中主动脉瓣置换术后急性肾损伤。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2019 Feb 1;34(2):295-300. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfy097.
3
The impact of mitral stenosis on outcomes of aortic valve stenosis patient undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement or transcatheter aortic valve replacement.二尖瓣狭窄对接受外科主动脉瓣置换术或经导管主动脉瓣置换术的主动脉瓣狭窄患者预后的影响。
J Interv Cardiol. 2018 Oct;31(5):655-660. doi: 10.1111/joic.12519. Epub 2018 May 17.
4
Racial disparities in the treatment of aortic stenosis: Has transcatheter aortic valve replacement bridged the gap?种族差异对主动脉瓣狭窄的治疗:经导管主动脉瓣置换术是否缩小了差距?
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jul 1;98(1):148-156. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29487. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
5
Temporal Trends and Outcomes of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗二叶式主动脉瓣狭窄的时间趋势和结局。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Sep 23;12(18):1811-1822. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.06.037.
6
African Americans have worse outcomes after transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement: A national inpatient sample analysis from 2015 to 2020.非裔美国人在经导管主动脉瓣置换术和外科主动脉瓣置换术后的预后更差:2015 年至 2020 年全国住院患者样本分析。
J Cardiol. 2024 Aug;84(2):105-112. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2024.02.003. Epub 2024 Feb 17.
7
Minimally invasive, surgical, and transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A network meta-analysis.微创、外科手术和经导管主动脉瓣置换术:网状荟萃分析。
J Cardiol. 2024 Mar;83(3):177-183. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2023.08.010. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
8
Comparative Outcomes of Surgical and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis in Nonagenarians.非agenarians主动脉瓣狭窄患者外科手术与经导管主动脉瓣置换术的比较结果。 注:这里“Nonagenarians”指的是九十多岁的人,可根据实际语境调整表述,比如“九十多岁的老年患者” 。
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Mar 15;119(6):893-899. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.11.045. Epub 2016 Dec 18.
9
Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Prior Mediastinal Radiation.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术在既往纵隔放疗患者中的比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Nov 23;13(22):2658-2666. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.08.010.
10
Hospital outcomes of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in female in the United States.美国女性经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的医院治疗结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Mar 1;91(4):813-819. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27362. Epub 2017 Oct 9.

引用本文的文献

1
The Cost of Waiting for a Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Medicare Beneficiaries With Severe Aortic Stenosis.医疗保险重度主动脉瓣狭窄受益人等待经导管主动脉瓣置换术的成本
Struct Heart. 2024 Jun 12;8(6):100321. doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2024.100321. eCollection 2024 Nov.