• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保险重度主动脉瓣狭窄受益人等待经导管主动脉瓣置换术的成本

The Cost of Waiting for a Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Medicare Beneficiaries With Severe Aortic Stenosis.

作者信息

Sethi Ankur, Elmariah Sammy, Gunnarsson Candace, Ryan Michael, Chikermane Soumya, Thompson Christin, Russo Mark

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, New Jersey.

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco (S.E.).

出版信息

Struct Heart. 2024 Jun 12;8(6):100321. doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2024.100321. eCollection 2024 Nov.

DOI:10.1016/j.shj.2024.100321
PMID:39670051
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11632791/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Aortic stenosis (AS) is a prevalent valvular disorder necessitating timely intervention, particularly when symptomatic. Aortic valve replacement (AVR) is the recommended treatment, but delays in access to AVR are common and linked to adverse outcomes and increased health care costs. This study aims to assess the health care cost burden associated with delaying transcatheter AVR (TAVR) in Medicare Advantage beneficiaries with clinically significant AS.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This retrospective database study utilized the Optum de-identified U.S. claims database, encompassing Medicare Advantage enrollees. Patients aged 65 years or older were identified as having AS based on medical billing codes and were required to have a record of syncope, dyspnea, fatigue, chest pain/angina, or heart failure prior to, on or within 30 days of their incident AS diagnosis. Total health care costs were analyzed over a 2-year period, regressed against the delay in receiving TAVR, and adjusted for covariates. In the 4105 patients meeting study inclusion criteria, delays in TAVR were associated with a significant increase in health care costs, translating to those waiting 12 months for TAVR incurring an additional cost of $10,080 compared to those receiving TAVR promptly. Non-TAVR related costs largely drove this increase.

CONCLUSIONS

Delaying TAVR in clinically significant AS patients is associated with higher health care costs, emphasizing the need for timely interventions. Addressing delays in TAVR access and optimizing pre-TAVR workup can potentially improve patient outcomes and reduce health care expenditure.

摘要

背景

主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)是一种常见的瓣膜疾病,需要及时干预,尤其是出现症状时。主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)是推荐的治疗方法,但获得AVR的延迟很常见,且与不良后果和医疗保健成本增加有关。本研究旨在评估在具有临床显著意义的AS的医疗保险优势受益人中延迟经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)所带来的医疗保健成本负担。

方法和结果

这项回顾性数据库研究利用了Optum去识别化的美国索赔数据库,该数据库涵盖医疗保险优势参保者。根据医疗计费代码确定65岁及以上的患者患有AS,并要求他们在首次AS诊断之前、之时或之后30天内有晕厥、呼吸困难、疲劳、胸痛/心绞痛或心力衰竭的记录。在2年期间分析总医疗保健成本,针对接受TAVR的延迟进行回归分析,并对协变量进行调整。在符合研究纳入标准的4105名患者中,TAVR的延迟与医疗保健成本的显著增加相关,这意味着等待12个月进行TAVR的患者比立即接受TAVR的患者额外花费10,080美元。非TAVR相关成本在很大程度上推动了这一增长。

结论

在具有临床显著意义的AS患者中延迟TAVR与更高的医疗保健成本相关,这强调了及时干预的必要性。解决TAVR获取方面的延迟并优化TAVR术前检查可能会改善患者预后并降低医疗保健支出。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6c5/11632791/8122a401147f/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6c5/11632791/29659534addc/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6c5/11632791/32352a5c2e9f/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6c5/11632791/e1debb70886f/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6c5/11632791/8122a401147f/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6c5/11632791/29659534addc/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6c5/11632791/32352a5c2e9f/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6c5/11632791/e1debb70886f/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6c5/11632791/8122a401147f/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
The Cost of Waiting for a Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Medicare Beneficiaries With Severe Aortic Stenosis.医疗保险重度主动脉瓣狭窄受益人等待经导管主动脉瓣置换术的成本
Struct Heart. 2024 Jun 12;8(6):100321. doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2024.100321. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Economic Outcomes of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis and Low Surgical Risk: Results from the PARTNER 3 Trial.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗低手术风险重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的经济学结局:PARTNER 3 试验结果。
Circulation. 2023 May 23;147(21):1594-1605. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.062481. Epub 2023 May 8.
3
Cost-effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared with surgical aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: results of the PARTNER (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves) trial (Cohort A).经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗高危重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的成本效益比较:PARTNER(主动脉瓣经导管置换术)试验(队列 A)的结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Dec 25;60(25):2683-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.09.018. Epub 2012 Nov 1.
4
Contemporary Costs Associated With Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Medicare Beneficiaries.在 Medicare 受益人群中,经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术相关的当代成本。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Mar;15(3):e011295. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.121.011295. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
5
Cost-Effectiveness of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis at Intermediate Risk.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗中危重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的成本效果分析。
Circulation. 2019 Feb 12;139(7):877-888. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035236.
6
No-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) Zones and Their Effect on Access to Care for Medicare Beneficiaries with Aortic Stenosis.非经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)区域及其对患有主动脉瓣狭窄的医疗保险受益人的医疗服务可及性的影响。
Adv Ther. 2025 Apr;42(4):1716-1728. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03116-8. Epub 2025 Feb 13.
7
Cost and contribution margin of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的成本与边际贡献。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Dec;154(6):1872-1880.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.06.020. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
8
Health Status After Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis at Increased Surgical Risk: Results From the CoreValve US Pivotal Trial.手术风险增加的重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者经导管或外科主动脉瓣置换术后的健康状况:CoreValve美国关键试验的结果
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Aug 17;8(9):1207-1217. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.04.018.
9
Trends in Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Among Older Adults in the United States.美国老年患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的发展趋势。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Nov 30;78(22):2161-2172. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.09.855.
10
Incremental cost and length of stay associated with postprocedure delirium in transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement patients in the United States.美国经导管和外科主动脉瓣置换患者术后谵妄的增量成本及住院时间
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 May 1;93(6):1132-1136. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28014. Epub 2018 Dec 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of Telemedicine TAVR Preoperative Evaluations.远程医疗经导管主动脉瓣置换术术前评估的结果。
JACC Adv. 2025 Aug 28;4(10 Pt 2):102087. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.102087.

本文引用的文献

1
Cardiac Damage and Quality of Life After Aortic Valve Replacement in the PARTNER Trials.PARTNER试验中主动脉瓣置换术后的心脏损伤与生活质量
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023 Feb 28;81(8):743-752. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.11.059.
2
Racial and Ethnic Differences in the Clinical Diagnosis of Aortic Stenosis.种族和民族差异对主动脉瓣狭窄的临床诊断影响
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Dec 20;11(24):e025692. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.025692. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
3
Sex Disparities in the Treatment of Aortic Stenosis and Related Outcomes: An Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample.
主动脉瓣狭窄治疗中的性别差异及相关结局:基于全国住院患者样本的分析
Cardiology. 2022;147(5-6):557-565. doi: 10.1159/000526255. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
4
Trends in Medicare Payments for Beneficiaries With Aortic Stenosis.主动脉瓣狭窄患者的医疗保险支付趋势。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Jul 19;11(14):e026102. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.026102. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
5
Changes to transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) services during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: A single centre experience from United Kingdom tertiary hospital.新冠疫情期间经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)服务的变化:来自英国三级医院的单中心经验。
Hellenic J Cardiol. 2022 Sep-Oct;67:36-41. doi: 10.1016/j.hjc.2022.07.001. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
6
Patient- and Process-Related Contributors to the Underuse of Aortic Valve Replacement and Subsequent Mortality in Ambulatory Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis.门诊重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者主动脉瓣置换术使用率低及其后续死亡率的患者相关和流程相关因素。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Jun 7;11(11):e025065. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.025065. Epub 2022 May 27.
7
Modeling the impact of delaying transcatheter aortic valve replacement for the treatment of aortic stenosis in the era of COVID-19.模拟在新冠疫情时代延迟经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗主动脉瓣狭窄的影响。
JTCVS Open. 2021 Sep;7:63-71. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2021.06.006. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
8
Racial disparities in the treatment of aortic stenosis: Has transcatheter aortic valve replacement bridged the gap?种族差异对主动脉瓣狭窄的治疗:经导管主动脉瓣置换术是否缩小了差距?
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jul 1;98(1):148-156. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29487. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
9
2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2020美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会瓣膜性心脏病患者管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南联合委员会报告
Circulation. 2021 Feb 2;143(5):e72-e227. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000923. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
10
Increasing Wait-Time Mortality for Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Population-Level Study of the Transition in Practice From Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者等待时间导致的死亡率增加:一项关于从外科主动脉瓣置换术到经导管主动脉瓣置换术实践转变的人群水平研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Nov;13(11):e009297. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009297. Epub 2020 Nov 10.