Département de Microbiologie Fondamentale, Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
ISME J. 2022 Dec;16(12):2644-2652. doi: 10.1038/s41396-022-01314-8. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
Predicting whether microbial invaders will colonize an environment is critical for managing natural and engineered ecosystems, and controlling infectious disease. Invaders often face competition by resident microbes. But how invasions play out in communities dominated by facilitative interactions is less clear. We previously showed that growth medium toxicity can promote facilitation between four bacterial species, as species that cannot grow alone rely on others to survive. Following the same logic, here we allowed other bacterial species to invade the four-species community and found that invaders could more easily colonize a toxic medium when the community was present. In a more benign environment instead, invasive species that could survive alone colonized more successfully when the residents were absent. Next, we asked whether early colonists could exclude future ones through a priority effect, by inoculating the invaders into the resident community only after its members had co-evolved for 44 weeks. Compared to the ancestral community, the co-evolved resident community was more competitive toward invaders and less affected by them. Our experiments show how communities may assemble by facilitating one another in harsh, sterile environments, but that arriving after community members have co-evolved can limit invasion success.
预测微生物入侵者是否会在环境中定殖对于管理自然和工程生态系统以及控制传染病至关重要。入侵者通常会受到常驻微生物的竞争。但是,在以促进相互作用为主导的群落中,入侵是如何发挥作用的还不太清楚。我们之前曾表明,生长介质的毒性可以促进四种细菌之间的共生关系,因为不能单独生长的物种依赖其他物种生存。基于同样的逻辑,在这里我们允许其他细菌物种入侵四物种群落,结果发现当群落存在时,入侵物种在有毒介质中更容易定殖。而在环境更温和的情况下,当居民不存在时,那些可以独自生存的入侵物种的定殖成功率更高。接下来,我们通过优先效应来询问早期殖民者是否可以通过优先效应来排斥后来的殖民者,即将入侵者接种到常驻群落中,而常驻群落的成员已经共同进化了 44 周。与原始群落相比,共同进化的常驻群落对入侵者更具竞争力,受其影响更小。我们的实验表明,在恶劣、无菌的环境中,群落如何通过相互促进来组装,但在社区成员共同进化之后到达可能会限制入侵的成功。