Piccardi Philippe, Ulrich Eric, Garcia-Garcerà Marc, Martino Rita Di, Testa Samuele E A, Mitri Sara
Department of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne 1015, Switzerland.
Swiss Institute for Bioinformatics, Lausanne 1015, Switzerland.
Evol Lett. 2024 Jul 19;8(6):828-840. doi: 10.1093/evlett/qrae036. eCollection 2024 Dec.
Microbial evolution is typically studied in monocultures or in communities of competing species. But microbes do not always compete and how positive inter-species interactions drive evolution is less clear: Initially facilitative communities may either evolve increased mutualism, increased reliance on certain species according to the Black Queen Hypothesis (BQH), or weaker interactions and resource specialization. To distinguish between these outcomes, we evolved four species for 44 weeks either alone or together in a toxic pollutant. These species initially facilitated each other, promoting each other's survival and pollutant degradation. After evolution, two species ( and ) that initially relied fully on others to survive continued to do so, with no evidence for increased mutualism. Instead, and () whose ancestors interacted positively, evolved in community to interact more neutrally and grew less well than when they had evolved alone, suggesting that the community limited their adaptation. We detected several gene loss events in when evolving with others, but these events did not increase its reliance on other species, contrary to expectations under the BQH. We hypothesize instead that these gene loss events are a consequence of resource specialization. Finally, co-evolved communities degraded the pollutant worse than their ancestors. Together, our results support the evolution of weakened interactions and resource specialization, similar to what has been observed in competitive communities.
微生物进化通常在单一培养物或竞争物种群落中进行研究。但微生物并不总是相互竞争,种间积极相互作用如何驱动进化尚不清楚:最初具有促进作用的群落可能会进化出更强的互利共生关系,根据黑皇后假说(BQH)增加对某些物种的依赖,或者发展出较弱的相互作用和资源特化。为了区分这些结果,我们让四个物种在有毒污染物中单独或共同进化44周。这些物种最初相互促进,提高彼此的存活率并促进污染物降解。进化后,最初完全依赖其他物种生存的两个物种( 和 )继续如此,没有证据表明互利共生关系增强。相反,其祖先曾有积极相互作用的 和 ( )在群落中进化后相互作用变得更中性,且生长情况不如单独进化时,这表明群落限制了它们的适应性。当 与其他物种共同进化时,我们检测到了几个基因丢失事件,但这些事件并未增加其对其他物种的依赖,这与BQH的预期相反。相反,我们推测这些基因丢失事件是资源特化的结果。最后,共同进化的群落对污染物的降解能力比其祖先更差。总之,我们的结果支持了相互作用减弱和资源特化的进化,这与在竞争群落中观察到的情况类似。