Willett W
Int J Epidemiol. 1987 Jun;16(2):312-7. doi: 10.1093/ije/16.2.312.
Studies of diet in relation to disease raise methodological challenges considerably more complicated than in most epidemiological investigations. Diet is not a single exposure, but rather a complex set of many intercorrelated continuous variables. Moreover, these variables are likely to have non-linear relationships with disease and interact with each other. Many epidemiologists have questioned whether useful measurements of individual diets could be made within populations, due to homogeneity of food intake and imprecision of assessment methods. However, in several recent studies it has been possible to demonstrate reasonable levels of correlation between simple, structured food frequency questionnaires and detailed, weighed assessments of diet. This provides evidence documenting that between-person variation in diet does exist and that simple questionnaires are sufficiently accurate to measure these differences. For a limited set of nutrients, biochemical measurements provide an alternative assessment of exposure. It remains to be seen whether these methodologies can be reliably employed in case-control studies since even small biases due to the presence of illness, which may affect recall of diet or the levels of biochemical parameters, will seriously distort relationships between diet and disease.
与疾病相关的饮食研究提出的方法学挑战比大多数流行病学调查要复杂得多。饮食不是单一的暴露因素,而是一组由许多相互关联的连续变量组成的复杂集合。此外,这些变量可能与疾病存在非线性关系,并且相互作用。由于食物摄入量的同质性和评估方法的不精确性,许多流行病学家质疑在人群中是否能够对个体饮食进行有效的测量。然而,在最近的几项研究中,已经能够证明简单的结构化食物频率问卷与详细的饮食称重评估之间存在合理程度的相关性。这提供了证据,证明饮食的个体间差异确实存在,并且简单的问卷足以准确测量这些差异。对于有限的一组营养素,生化测量提供了另一种暴露评估方法。这些方法是否能够可靠地应用于病例对照研究还有待观察,因为即使是由于疾病导致的微小偏差,可能会影响饮食回忆或生化参数水平,也会严重扭曲饮食与疾病之间的关系。