Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California.
Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023 Dec 1;32(12):1716-1725. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-1216.
The number of breast cancer survivors is increasing, yet evidence to inform dietary and lifestyle guidelines is limited.
This analysis included 3,658 participants from the Pathways Study, a prospective cohort of women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer. A healthy plant-based dietary index score (hPDI), an American Cancer Society (ACS) nutrition guidelines score, a 2015 Healthy Eating Index score (HEI), hours per week of moderate to vigorous physical activity (PA), and lifetime cumulative pack-years of cigarette smoking (SM) were each measured at diagnosis, 6, 24, and 72 months. Using g-computation, 5- and 10-year risk ratios (RR), risk differences, and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for all-cause mortality under hypothetical interventions on diet quality, PA, and SM, compared with the natural course (no intervention) were calculated.
Hypothetical moderate to extreme interventions on hPDI, ACS, and HEI, each in combination with PA and SM, showed 11% to 56%, 9% to 38%, and 9% to 49% decreases in 5-year risks of all-cause mortality compared with no intervention, respectively [(hPDI: RRmoderate = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.82-0.94; RRextreme = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.26-0.67), (ACS: RRmoderate = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.85-0.96; RRextreme = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.43-0.82), (HEI: RRmoderate = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.84-0.95; RRextreme = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.33-0.72)]. While 10-year relative risks were slightly attenuated, absolute risk reductions were more pronounced.
Interventions to improve diet quality, increase PA, or reduce SM at the time of diagnosis may improve survival among breast cancer survivors.
We estimate that over 10% of deaths could be delayed by even moderate adoption of these behaviors.
乳腺癌幸存者的数量正在增加,但提供相关饮食和生活方式指导的证据有限。
本分析纳入了 Pathways 研究的 3658 名参与者,这是一个前瞻性队列研究,纳入了诊断为浸润性乳腺癌的女性。在诊断时、6 个月、24 个月和 72 个月时,评估了健康植物性饮食指数评分(hPDI)、美国癌症协会(ACS)营养指南评分、2015 年健康饮食指数评分(HEI)、每周中等到剧烈体力活动(PA)的时间以及终生累计吸烟包年数(SM)。通过 g 计算,对于假设的饮食质量、PA 和 SM 干预与自然病程(无干预)相比,计算了所有原因死亡率的 5 年和 10 年风险比(RR)、风险差异和 95%置信区间(CI)。
hPDI、ACS 和 HEI 的中等至极端干预假设,与 PA 和 SM 相结合,与无干预相比,5 年全因死亡率风险分别降低 11%至 56%、9%至 38%和 9%至 49%[(hPDI:RR 中等=0.89,95%CI:0.82-0.94;RR 极端=0.44,95%CI:0.26-0.67),(ACS:RR 中等=0.91,95%CI:0.85-0.96;RR 极端=0.62,95%CI:0.43-0.82),(HEI:RR 中等=0.91,95%CI:0.84-0.95;RR 极端=0.51,95%CI:0.33-0.72)]。虽然 10 年相对风险略有减弱,但绝对风险降低更为显著。
在诊断时改善饮食质量、增加 PA 或减少 SM 的干预措施可能会提高乳腺癌幸存者的生存率。
我们估计,即使这些行为的中度采用也可能使 10%以上的死亡推迟。