Suppr超能文献

中枢神经系统器质性疾病引起的淡漠的非药物干预效果:网络荟萃分析。

Non-pharmacological intervention effects on apathy caused by central nervous system organic diseases: A network meta-analysis.

机构信息

Nursing Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan, China.

Nursing Department of the Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Sep 2;101(35):e30467. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030467.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the best non-pharmacological interventions on apathy in patients with central nervous system (CNS) organic diseases.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library electronic databases, China national knowledge infrastructure, Wanfang and Chinese biomedical literature database studies published from 2011 to May 29, 2021. A combination of subject words and free words were used for searching. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of non-pharmacological interventions for apathy in patients with central nervous organic disease were included. Two researchers independently identified the eligible RCTs and extracted information. The risk of bias within each individual trial was assessed using the Cocharane Collaboration's tool. Review Manager 5.4 and ADDIS 1.16.5 were used for data analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 5324 related studies were obtained in the initial screening, and final 8 RCTs including 334 patients were included, involving 4 non-pharmacological interventions of cognitive intervention, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), music therapy and occupational therapy. Direct comparison results showed that rTMS, cognitive intervention, and occupational therapy were superior to the conventional group (P < .05). Network Meta repeated rTMS, cognitive intervention was superior to the conventional group (P < .05), while the other groups did not differ from with the conventional group (P > .05). The order of superiority was rTMS, cognitive intervention, occupational therapy, music therapy, and conventional group.

CONCLUSION

Current evidence suggests that rTMS and cognitive interventions are more effective than the conventional intervention in improving apathy in patients with CNS organic diseases. It still needs more non-pharmacological intervention studies with high quality, larger sample sizes for further exploration.

摘要

背景

评估中枢神经系统(CNS)器质性疾病患者淡漠的最佳非药物干预措施。

方法

我们检索了 PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆电子数据库、中国知识基础设施、万方和中国生物医学文献数据库,检索了 2011 年 5 月 29 日发表的研究。使用主题词和自由词相结合进行搜索。纳入针对中枢神经系统器质性疾病患者淡漠的非药物干预随机对照试验(RCT)。两名研究人员独立识别合格的 RCT 并提取信息。使用 Cochrane 协作工具评估每个单独试验的偏倚风险。使用 Review Manager 5.4 和 ADDIS 1.16.5 进行数据分析。

结果

在初步筛选中获得了 5324 项相关研究,最终纳入了 8 项 RCT 研究,共 334 名患者,涉及认知干预、重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)、音乐治疗和职业治疗 4 种非药物干预措施。直接比较结果显示,rTMS、认知干预和职业治疗均优于常规组(P <.05)。网络荟萃分析结果显示,rTMS 与认知干预均优于常规组(P <.05),而其他组与常规组差异无统计学意义(P >.05)。优势排序为 rTMS、认知干预、职业治疗、音乐治疗和常规组。

结论

目前的证据表明,rTMS 和认知干预比常规干预更能改善 CNS 器质性疾病患者的淡漠。仍需要更多高质量、大样本量的非药物干预研究来进一步探索。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bdb/9439802/7bb8bb456167/medi-101-e30467-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验