Suppr超能文献

坦桑尼亚东北部双层药物处理蚊帐(Interceptor® G2)对侧壁和顶篷的按蚊(Anopheles arabiensis)的效果。

Efficacy of bednets with dual insecticide-treated netting (Interceptor® G2) on side and roof panels against Anopheles arabiensis in north-eastern Tanzania.

机构信息

Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, Pan African Malaria Vector Research Consortium, Moshi, Tanzania.

出版信息

Parasit Vectors. 2022 Sep 15;15(1):326. doi: 10.1186/s13071-022-05454-w.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Optimising insecticide use and managing insecticide resistance are important to sustain gains against malaria using long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs). Restricting insecticides to where mosquitoes are most likely to make multiple contacts could reduce the quantity of insecticide needed to treat the nets. Previous studies have shown that nets partially treated with a pyrethroid insecticide had equivalent mortality compared to a fully treated net. This study compared the efficacy of: (i) whole Interceptor® G2 nets (IG2; a dual-active LLIN containing alpha-cypermethrin and chlorfenapyr), (ii) nets with roof panels made of IG2 netting, (iii) nets with side panels made of IG2 netting and (iv) whole untreated nets as test nets.

METHODS

The study was conducted in cow-baited experimental huts, Moshi Tanzania, using a four-arm Latin square design. Test nets had 30 holes cut in panels to simulate a typical net after 2-3 year use. The trial data were analysed using generalized linear models with mortality, blood-feeding, exophily and deterrence against wild free-flying Anopheles arabiensis as outcomes and test nets as predictors.

RESULTS

Mortality was significantly higher in the nets with roof IG2 [27%, P = 0.001, odds ratio (OR) = 51.0, 95% CI = 4.8-546.2), side IG2 (44%, P < 0.001, OR = 137.6, 95% CI = 12.2-1553.2] and whole IG2 (53%, P < 0.001, OR = 223.0, 95% CI = 19.07-2606.0) nettings than the untreated (1%) nets. Mortality was also significantly higher in the whole IG2 net compared to the net with roof IG2 netting (P = 0.009, OR = 4.4, 95% CI = 1.4-13.3). Blood feeding was 22% in untreated, 10% in roof IG2, 14% in side IG2 and 19% in whole IG2 nets. Exiting was 92% in untreated, 89% in roof IG2, 97% in side IG2 and 94% whole IG2 nets.

CONCLUSION

The results show that although the roof-treated IG2 net induced greater mortality compared to untreated nets, its efficacy was reduced compared to whole IG2 nets. Therefore, there was no benefit to be gained from restricting dual-active ingredient IG2 netting to the roof of nets.

摘要

背景

为了在使用长效驱虫蚊帐(LLINs)的情况下维持疟疾防治成果,优化杀虫剂的使用和管理杀虫剂抗性至关重要。将杀虫剂限制在蚊子最有可能多次接触的地方,可以减少处理蚊帐所需的杀虫剂数量。先前的研究表明,部分用拟除虫菊酯杀虫剂处理的蚊帐与完全处理的蚊帐具有同等的死亡率。本研究比较了以下四种测试蚊帐的效果:(i)全 Interceptor® G2 蚊帐(IG2;一种含有 alpha-氯菊酯和氯菊酯的双活性长效蚊帐),(ii)带有 IG2 网眼屋顶面板的蚊帐,(iii)带有 IG2 网眼侧面板的蚊帐和(iv)未经处理的全尺寸蚊帐。

方法

本研究在坦桑尼亚莫希的牛诱捕实验小屋中进行,采用四臂拉丁方设计。测试蚊帐的面板上有 30 个孔,模拟经过 2-3 年使用后的典型蚊帐。使用广义线性模型分析试验数据,以死亡率、吸血、外逃和对野生自由飞行的疟蚊的驱避率为结局,以测试蚊帐为预测因子。

结果

带有 IG2 屋顶的蚊帐(27%,P=0.001,OR=51.0,95%CI=4.8-546.2)、带有 IG2 侧面板的蚊帐(44%,P<0.001,OR=137.6,95%CI=12.2-1553.2)和全 IG2 蚊帐(53%,P<0.001,OR=223.0,95%CI=19.07-2606.0)的死亡率明显高于未经处理(1%)的蚊帐。全 IG2 蚊帐的死亡率也明显高于 IG2 屋顶蚊帐(P=0.009,OR=4.4,95%CI=1.4-13.3)。未经处理的蚊帐血液摄入率为 22%,IG2 屋顶处理的蚊帐为 10%,IG2 侧面板处理的蚊帐为 14%,全 IG2 蚊帐为 19%。未经处理的蚊帐外逃率为 92%,IG2 屋顶处理的蚊帐为 89%,IG2 侧面板处理的蚊帐为 97%,全 IG2 蚊帐为 94%。

结论

结果表明,虽然屋顶处理的 IG2 网比未经处理的网诱导更高的死亡率,但与全 IG2 网相比,其效果降低。因此,将双活性成分 IG2 网限制在网的屋顶上并没有带来任何好处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb7b/9479251/7b79433ab488/13071_2022_5454_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验