• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

磷酸锌水门汀、树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀和两种双固化树脂水门汀微渗漏的比较评价:研究

Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Zinc Phosphate Cement, Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer, and Two Dual-Cure Resin Cements: Study.

作者信息

Jacob Jose, Devadathan A, Joseph Suja, Dathan Pradeep C, Mathew Suja, Kuriakose Rene

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Pushpagiri College of Dental Sciences, Thiruvalla, Kerala, India.

Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Pushpagiri College of Dental Sciences, Thrissur, Kerala, India.

出版信息

J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2022 Jul;14(Suppl 1):S631-S637. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_756_21. Epub 2022 Jul 13.

DOI:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_756_21
PMID:36110690
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9469371/
Abstract

AIMS

The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the sealing ability of a new resin cement which was undergoing trial with other three luting cements.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

study.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Forty extracted intact human premolars were selected and standardized class 5 preparations for inlays were done at cementoenamel junction of buccal surfaces and direct composite inlay was fabricated. The samples were randomly grouped into 4: Group I luted with Rely X ARC resin cement, Group II with DCRC-10, a new indigenously developed resin cement, Group III with FujiCEM, and Group IV with zinc phosphate. After 24 h storage, samples were thermocycled and immersed in basic fuchsine dye. The longitudinal sections were assessed under a stereomicroscope for microleakage using graded criteria.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED

To analyze leakage scores among four groups and between enamel and dentin/cementum margins, Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric test and the Mann-Whitney test at < 0.05 were used.

RESULTS

The dye penetration at cementum/dentin margins showed a statistically significant difference among four groups ( < 0.001). Adhesive luting cements produced lesser leakage scores at both margins than those cemented with zinc phosphate.

CONCLUSIONS

The indigenously developed resin cement (DCRC-10, Group II) is comparable to that of Group I (RelyX ARC) in terms of its luting efficiency.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估并比较一种正在试验的新型树脂水门汀与其他三种粘结水门汀的封闭能力。

设置与设计

研究。

研究对象与方法

选取40颗完整拔除的人类前磨牙,在颊面牙骨质釉质界制备标准化的5类嵌体预备体,并制作直接复合嵌体。样本随机分为4组:第I组用Rely X ARC树脂水门汀粘结,第II组用新研发的国产树脂水门汀DCRC - 10粘结,第III组用FujiCEM粘结,第IV组用磷酸锌粘结。储存24小时后,样本进行热循环处理并浸入碱性品红染料中。在体视显微镜下根据分级标准评估纵向切片的微渗漏情况。

所用统计分析方法

为分析四组之间以及釉质与牙本质/牙骨质边缘之间的渗漏评分,使用Kruskal - Wallis非参数检验和Mann - Whitney检验(P < 0.05)。

结果

四组在牙骨质/牙本质边缘的染料渗透情况存在统计学显著差异(P < 0.001)。粘结性水门汀在两个边缘产生的渗漏评分均低于用磷酸锌粘结的情况。

结论

国产树脂水门汀(第II组DCRC - 10)在粘结效率方面与第I组(RelyX ARC)相当。

相似文献

1
Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Zinc Phosphate Cement, Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer, and Two Dual-Cure Resin Cements: Study.磷酸锌水门汀、树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀和两种双固化树脂水门汀微渗漏的比较评价:研究
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2022 Jul;14(Suppl 1):S631-S637. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_756_21. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
2
Comparison of microleakage of three acid-base luting cements versus one resin-bonded cement for Class V direct composite inlays.三种酸碱粘结水门汀与一种树脂粘结水门汀用于Ⅴ类直接复合嵌体时微渗漏情况的比较
J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Dec;88(6):598-603. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2002.129383.
3
In vitro evaluation of wall-to-wall adaptation of a self-adhesive resin cement used for luting gold and ceramic inlays.用于粘结金嵌体和陶瓷嵌体的自粘结树脂水门汀壁对壁适应性的体外评估
J Adhes Dent. 2005 Spring;7(1):33-40.
4
In vitro evaluation of microleakage of indirect composite inlays cemented with four luting agents.使用四种粘结剂粘结的间接复合嵌体微渗漏的体外评估
J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Jun;93(6):563-70. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.04.004.
5
Microleakage in ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements.使用不同树脂水门汀粘结的陶瓷嵌体的微渗漏
J Adhes Dent. 2003 Spring;5(1):63-70.
6
Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.使用不同树脂水门汀和牙本质黏接剂黏固的陶瓷嵌体的微渗漏
J Prosthet Dent. 2009 Oct;102(4):235-41. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60161-X.
7
Microleakage around zirconia crown margins after ultrasonic scaling with self-adhesive resin or resin modified glass ionomer cement.氧化锆全瓷冠边缘微渗漏:超声洁牙后使用自粘接树脂或树脂改良型玻璃离子水门汀。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018 Jan;30(1):73-80. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12348. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
8
Comparative evaluation of different periods of enamel microabrasion on the microleakage of class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations: An study.不同时期釉质微磨除对V类树脂改性玻璃离子和复合体修复体微渗漏影响的比较评价:一项研究。
Indian J Dent Res. 2017 Nov-Dec;28(6):675-680. doi: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_657_16.
9
In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material.粘接水门汀和全冠基底材料的体外微渗漏
J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Mar;85(3):292-8. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2001.113705.
10
Microleakage and marginal gap of adhesive cements for noble alloy full cast crowns.贵金属合金全冠用黏结水门汀的微渗漏和边缘间隙。
Oper Dent. 2011 May-Jun;36(3):258-65. doi: 10.2341/10-253-L. Epub 2011 Jul 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Microleakage Using Different Luting Cements in Kedo Zirconia Crowns: An In Vitro Assessment.使用不同粘结水门汀对Kedo氧化锆全冠微渗漏的评估:一项体外研究
Cureus. 2024 Aug 5;16(8):e66237. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66237. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
A Comparative Evaluation of the Bonding Strength, Marginal Adaptation, and Microleakage of Dental Cements in Prosthodontics: An In Vitro Comparative Study.口腔修复学中牙科水门汀粘结强度、边缘适应性及微渗漏的比较评价:一项体外比较研究
Cureus. 2024 Jul 27;16(7):e65534. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65534. eCollection 2024 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Improvement of enamel bond strengths for conventional and resin-modified glass ionomers: acid-etching vs. conditioning.提高传统型和树脂改良型玻璃离子水门汀的釉质粘结强度:酸蚀与预处理。
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2013 Nov;14(11):1013-24. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1300034.
2
Porosity of different dental luting cements.
Dent Mater. 2007 Jun;23(6):674-8. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.006. Epub 2006 Jul 24.
3
Effect of conditioner on bond strength of glass-ionomer adhesive to dentin/enamel with and without smear layer interposition.粘结剂对有或无玷污层介入情况下玻璃离子粘结剂与牙本质/牙釉质粘结强度的影响。
Oper Dent. 2004 Nov-Dec;29(6):685-92.
4
Hardening of dual-cure resin cements and a resin composite restorative cured with QTH and LED curing units.双固化树脂水门汀的固化以及用石英卤钨灯和发光二极管固化灯固化的树脂复合材料修复体的固化。
J Can Dent Assoc. 2004 May;70(5):323-8.
5
Mechanical and physical properties of contemporary dental luting agents.当代牙科粘结剂的机械性能和物理性能
J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Feb;89(2):127-34. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2003.20.
6
Comparison of microleakage of three acid-base luting cements versus one resin-bonded cement for Class V direct composite inlays.三种酸碱粘结水门汀与一种树脂粘结水门汀用于Ⅴ类直接复合嵌体时微渗漏情况的比较
J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Dec;88(6):598-603. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2002.129383.
7
Effect of cyclical lateral forces on microleakage in cervical resin composite restorations.周期性侧向力对颈部树脂复合材料修复体微渗漏的影响。
Quintessence Int. 2002 Mar;33(3):205-12.
8
Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations.Ⅱ类保守洞形银汞合金和树脂复合体修复体的边缘适合性
Quintessence Int. 2001 May;32(5):391-5.
9
In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material.粘接水门汀和全冠基底材料的体外微渗漏
J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Mar;85(3):292-8. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2001.113705.
10
Secondary caries: a literature review with case reports.继发龋:文献综述及病例报告
Quintessence Int. 2000 Mar;31(3):165-79.