Mjör I A, Toffenetti F
University of Florida, College of Dentistry, Box 100415, Gainesville, Florida 32610, USA.
Quintessence Int. 2000 Mar;31(3):165-79.
The clinical diagnosis of secondary caries is by far the most common reason for replacement of restorations, but the scientific basis for the diagnosis is meager. The purpose of this article is to review the literature on secondary (recurrent) caries and present case reports to document the problems encountered in the clinical diagnosis of secondary caries. The literature on secondary caries was critically reviewed and subdivided into clinical diagnosis, location of secondary lesions, histopathology, microleakage, and microbiology. The case reports included restorations that were scheduled to be replaced because of secondary caries or stained margins of composite restorations. The lesions were photographed preoperatively and postoperatively. Based on the limited literature available, secondary caries appears to be a localized lesion similar or identical to primary caries. It is most often localized gingivally on restorations. Narrow gaps, crevices, ditches, and "microleakage" do not lead to secondary caries, but wide voids may. Secondary caries is difficult to diagnose clinically. Consistency or hardness and discoloration of dentin and enamel are the best parameters. Secondary caries is the same as primary caries located at the margin of a restoration.
继发龋的临床诊断是目前修复体替换最常见的原因,但该诊断的科学依据却十分匮乏。本文旨在回顾关于继发(复发性)龋的文献,并呈现病例报告以记录继发龋临床诊断中遇到的问题。对继发龋的文献进行了批判性综述,并细分为临床诊断、继发损害的位置、组织病理学、微渗漏和微生物学。病例报告包括因继发龋或复合树脂修复体边缘染色而计划替换的修复体。术前和术后对损害进行了拍照。基于现有有限的文献,继发龋似乎是一种与原发龋相似或相同的局限性损害。它最常局限于修复体的牙龈部位。狭窄的间隙、裂缝、沟和“微渗漏”不会导致继发龋,但宽大的空隙可能会。继发龋在临床上难以诊断。牙本质和釉质的质地或硬度以及变色是最佳的诊断参数。继发龋与位于修复体边缘的原发龋相同。