Suppr超能文献

口腔修复学中牙科水门汀粘结强度、边缘适应性及微渗漏的比较评价:一项体外比较研究

A Comparative Evaluation of the Bonding Strength, Marginal Adaptation, and Microleakage of Dental Cements in Prosthodontics: An In Vitro Comparative Study.

作者信息

Hussain Alhamoudi Fahad, Vyas Rajesh, Vaddamannu Sunil K, Aldosari Lujain Ibrahim N, Alshadidi Abdulkhaliq Ali F, Kaur Aulakh Simran, Kamal Badiyani Bhumika, Kumar Amit

机构信息

Department of Dental Technology, College of Applied Medical Science, King Khalid University, Abha, SAU.

Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, SAU.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Jul 27;16(7):e65534. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65534. eCollection 2024 Jul.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The primary function of dental cement is to seal and support prosthodontic restorative materials. Proper selection of the dental cement contributes to the clinical success of the restoration.

METHODS

A total of 166 molar tooth samples were prepared to simulate the type of tooth commonly found in prosthodontic practice. Each sample was restored using one of the tested dental cement materials employing a prestabilized methodology. The performance of resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) (GC Fuji PLUS Capsule, GC America, Alsip, IL), zinc phosphate cement (ZPC) (Dentsply Sirona, Charlotte, NC), and resin cement (RC) (RelyX ARC, 3M ESPE, Saint Paul, MN) in bonding strength, marginal adaptation, and microleakage was evaluated and compared. The bonding strength, marginal adaptation, and microgroove were tested using specific established methodologies. The outcomes were then analyzed using statistical analyses for means and standard deviations to compare different types of dental cement.

RESULTS

The total outcome shows that the highest bonding strength with the highest mean was the resin cement, rating 24.8 MPa, followed by RMGIC and ZPC at 20.5 and 18.9 MPa, respectively. The marginal adaptation scores indicate that RC had the highest score at a mean of 4, followed by ZPC at 3.2 and RMGIC at 2.5. The dye penetration measurements in millimeters revealed that ZPC had a penetration of 0.31 mm, RMGIC had a penetration of 0.25 mm, and RC had the least penetration at 0.20 mm. The results of the statistical data analysis show significant differences between the dental cements in bonding strength and marginal adaptation.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, resin cement demonstrated superior performance in bonding strength, marginal adaptation, and resistance to microleakage compared to RMGIC and zinc phosphate cement. These findings highlight the importance of selecting resin cement for achieving optimal clinical outcomes in prosthodontic restorations.

摘要

背景

牙科粘固剂的主要功能是封闭和支持口腔修复材料。正确选择牙科粘固剂有助于修复体的临床成功。

方法

制备了166颗磨牙样本,以模拟口腔修复实践中常见的牙齿类型。每个样本使用一种经过测试的牙科粘固剂材料,采用预稳定方法进行修复。评估并比较了树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀(RMGIC)(GC Fuji PLUS胶囊,GC America,阿尔西普,伊利诺伊州)、磷酸锌水门汀(ZPC)(登士柏西诺德,夏洛特,北卡罗来纳州)和树脂水门汀(RC)(RelyX ARC,3M ESPE,圣保罗,明尼苏达州)在粘结强度、边缘适应性和微渗漏方面的性能。使用特定的既定方法测试粘结强度、边缘适应性和微沟。然后使用均值和标准差的统计分析来分析结果,以比较不同类型牙科粘固剂。

结果

总体结果表明,粘结强度最高且均值最高的是树脂水门汀,评分为24.8MPa,其次是RMGIC和ZPC,分别为20.5MPa和18.9MPa。边缘适应性评分表明,RC的平均分最高,为4分,其次是ZPC,为3.2分,RMGIC为2.5分。以毫米为单位的染料渗透测量显示,ZPC的渗透为0.31mm,RMGIC的渗透为0.25mm,RC的渗透最少,为0.20mm。统计数据分析结果表明,牙科粘固剂在粘结强度和边缘适应性方面存在显著差异。

结论

总之,与RMGIC和磷酸锌水门汀相比,树脂水门汀在粘结强度、边缘适应性和抗微渗漏方面表现出卓越的性能。这些发现凸显了选择树脂水门汀以实现口腔修复最佳临床效果的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab52/11346805/cda57ee8bbb0/cureus-0016-00000065534-i01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验