• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自1950年以来中欧广阔草原物种的急剧减少:(鳞翅目,Zygaenidae)属的林蛾作为一个典型例子。

Drastic decline of extensive grassland species in Central Europe since 1950: Forester moths of the genus (Lepidoptera, Zygaenidae) as a type example.

作者信息

Markl Gregor, Hinneberg Heiko, Tarmann Gerhard

机构信息

Department of Geosciences University of Tübingen Tübingen Germany.

University of Applied Forest Sciences Rottenburg Rottenburg a. N. Germany.

出版信息

Ecol Evol. 2022 Sep 12;12(9):e9291. doi: 10.1002/ece3.9291. eCollection 2022 Sep.

DOI:10.1002/ece3.9291
PMID:36110875
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9465506/
Abstract

The decline of biodiversity in general and of insect diversity in particular has been recognized as a major environmental problem in recent years. In this study, we analyze the distribution and the decline of populations of forester moths of the genus in Central Europe since 1950 as a type example of the loss of grassland biodiversity, and discuss potential drivers causing this decline. Based on the extensive work in museums and private collections, a literature review and own observations, and including data as far back as 1834, this genus helps to understand the deeper reasons of insect population and biodiversity decline, as the well investigated six Central European species cover a broad range of extensive grassland habitats (fens to low-production grassland and xerothermic steppes) from low altitudes to high alpine meadows. Therefore, they monitor processes relevant also to other, less investigated grassland species. Although there are differences in research intensity over time and in different natural areas, we show that in the whole of Central Europe, the populations of all six investigated species broke down massively in the past decades, both in terms of number of populated habitats (about 400 recorded localities after the year 2000 compared with a total number of about 1600 at all times, cumulated for all six species) and in terms of number of individuals. On the other hand, some natural areas on a regional scale have more or less maintained their populations, due to conservative land use and due to the early implementation of conservation and protection management plans. The reasons of decline are manifold and monitored in detail by the different species with their different habitat requirements. They comprise (1) loss of habitats due to land use changes (both intensification and abandonment), (2) loss of habitats due to urbanization and construction work, (3) loss of habitat networks to cope with small-scale extinction events, (4) more intensive growth of grass at the expense of other plants in otherwise undisturbed habitats due to fertilization through the air (increased nitrogen levels due to human activities) and (5) use of pesticides.

摘要

近年来,生物多样性的普遍下降,尤其是昆虫多样性的下降,已被公认为一个主要的环境问题。在本研究中,我们分析了自1950年以来中欧地区 属林蛾种群的分布及减少情况,以此作为草地生物多样性丧失的一个典型例子,并讨论导致这种减少的潜在驱动因素。基于在博物馆和私人收藏中的大量工作、文献综述以及自身观察,包括可追溯到1834年的数据,该属有助于理解昆虫种群和生物多样性下降的深层原因,因为经过充分研究的六个中欧物种涵盖了从低海拔到高海拔草甸的广泛的粗放草地栖息地(沼泽地到低产草地和干热草原)。因此,它们也监测与其他较少研究的草地物种相关的过程。尽管随着时间推移以及在不同自然区域研究强度存在差异,但我们表明,在整个中欧地区,过去几十年中,所有六个被调查的 物种的种群数量在栖息地数量(2000年后记录的约400个地点,与所有六个物种累计的约1600个地点总数相比)和个体数量方面都大幅减少。另一方面,由于土地利用保守以及早期实施了保护管理计划,一些区域尺度上的自然区域或多或少维持了它们的 种群数量。下降的原因是多方面的,不同物种因其不同的栖息地需求对此进行了详细监测。这些原因包括:(1)土地利用变化(集约化和弃耕)导致的栖息地丧失;(2)城市化和建设工程导致的栖息地丧失;(3)应对小规模灭绝事件的栖息地网络丧失;(4)在原本未受干扰的栖息地中,由于空气施肥(人类活动导致氮水平增加),以其他植物为代价的草生长更加旺盛;(5)农药的使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e762/9465506/51514362b4e9/ECE3-12-e9291-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e762/9465506/e791267b67a8/ECE3-12-e9291-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e762/9465506/667bb6fecb64/ECE3-12-e9291-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e762/9465506/7c3299b68481/ECE3-12-e9291-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e762/9465506/d80c3c6d7369/ECE3-12-e9291-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e762/9465506/dfa11b0300d3/ECE3-12-e9291-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e762/9465506/9f41dbc6d8d1/ECE3-12-e9291-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e762/9465506/58559fdbfc15/ECE3-12-e9291-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e762/9465506/0ba96ecd07f2/ECE3-12-e9291-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e762/9465506/1d5aee9d7634/ECE3-12-e9291-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e762/9465506/f22b505e04d8/ECE3-12-e9291-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e762/9465506/d0265feaadf9/ECE3-12-e9291-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e762/9465506/a588253102a7/ECE3-12-e9291-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e762/9465506/49caaef39532/ECE3-12-e9291-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e762/9465506/51514362b4e9/ECE3-12-e9291-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e762/9465506/e791267b67a8/ECE3-12-e9291-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e762/9465506/667bb6fecb64/ECE3-12-e9291-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e762/9465506/7c3299b68481/ECE3-12-e9291-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e762/9465506/d80c3c6d7369/ECE3-12-e9291-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e762/9465506/dfa11b0300d3/ECE3-12-e9291-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e762/9465506/9f41dbc6d8d1/ECE3-12-e9291-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e762/9465506/58559fdbfc15/ECE3-12-e9291-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e762/9465506/0ba96ecd07f2/ECE3-12-e9291-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e762/9465506/1d5aee9d7634/ECE3-12-e9291-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e762/9465506/f22b505e04d8/ECE3-12-e9291-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e762/9465506/d0265feaadf9/ECE3-12-e9291-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e762/9465506/a588253102a7/ECE3-12-e9291-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e762/9465506/49caaef39532/ECE3-12-e9291-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e762/9465506/51514362b4e9/ECE3-12-e9291-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Drastic decline of extensive grassland species in Central Europe since 1950: Forester moths of the genus (Lepidoptera, Zygaenidae) as a type example.自1950年以来中欧广阔草原物种的急剧减少:(鳞翅目,Zygaenidae)属的林蛾作为一个典型例子。
Ecol Evol. 2022 Sep 12;12(9):e9291. doi: 10.1002/ece3.9291. eCollection 2022 Sep.
2
Breakpoints in butterfly decline in Central Europe over the last century.上个世纪中欧蝴蝶数量减少的转折点。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Dec 10;851(Pt 2):158315. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158315. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
3
Effect of nature protection and management of grassland on biodiversity - Case from big flooded river valley (NE Poland).草地自然保护与管理对生物多样性的影响——以大洪水河谷(波兰东北部)为例。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Nov 10;898:165280. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165280. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
4
Drivers of Bird Species Richness within Moist High-Altitude Grasslands in Eastern South Africa.南非东部湿润高海拔草原鸟类物种丰富度的驱动因素
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 5;11(10):e0162609. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162609. eCollection 2016.
5
Livestock density affects species richness and community composition of butterflies: A nationwide study.牲畜密度影响蝴蝶的物种丰富度和群落组成:一项全国性研究。
Ecol Indic. 2023 Feb;146:109866. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.109866.
6
Long-term large-scale decline in relative abundances of butterfly and burnet moth species across south-western Germany.德国西南部蝴蝶和地老虎物种相对丰度的长期大规模下降。
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 17;9(1):14921. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51424-1.
7
Sampling Broad Habitat change to assess biodiversity conservation action in Northern Ireland.对广泛的栖息地变化进行采样,以评估北爱尔兰的生物多样性保护行动。
J Environ Manage. 2003 Mar;67(3):283-90. doi: 10.1016/s0301-4797(02)00180-9.
8
Application of remote sensing in alpine grasslands cover mapping of western Himalaya, Uttarakhand, India.遥感在印度北阿坎德邦喜马拉雅山西部高山草原覆盖制图中的应用。
Environ Monit Assess. 2021 Mar 6;193(4):166. doi: 10.1007/s10661-021-08956-9.
9
Land-use intensification causes multitrophic homogenization of grassland communities.土地利用集约化导致草原群落的多营养层同质化。
Nature. 2016 Dec 8;540(7632):266-269. doi: 10.1038/nature20575. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
10
Low-intensity agricultural landscapes in Transylvania support high butterfly diversity: implications for conservation.特兰西瓦尼亚的低强度农业景观支持着丰富的蝴蝶多样性:对保护工作的启示。
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 24;9(7):e103256. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103256. eCollection 2014.

本文引用的文献

1
The decline of butterflies in Europe: Problems, significance, and possible solutions.欧洲蝴蝶的减少:问题、意义和可能的解决方案。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jan 12;118(2). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2002551117.
2
International scientists formulate a roadmap for insect conservation and recovery.国际科学家制定昆虫保护与恢复路线图。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2020 Feb;4(2):174-176. doi: 10.1038/s41559-019-1079-8.
3
Long-term large-scale decline in relative abundances of butterfly and burnet moth species across south-western Germany.德国西南部蝴蝶和地老虎物种相对丰度的长期大规模下降。
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 17;9(1):14921. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51424-1.
4
Insect Declines in the Anthropocene.人类世的昆虫衰落。
Annu Rev Entomol. 2020 Jan 7;65:457-480. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-011019-025151. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
5
Butterfly abundance declines over 20 years of systematic monitoring in Ohio, USA.在美国俄亥俄州 20 多年的系统监测中,蝴蝶数量下降。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 9;14(7):e0216270. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216270. eCollection 2019.
6
More than 75 percent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas.保护区内飞行昆虫生物量在 27 年内下降了 75%以上。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 18;12(10):e0185809. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185809. eCollection 2017.
7
Country-specific effects of neonicotinoid pesticides on honey bees and wild bees.不同国家的新烟碱类农药对蜜蜂和野生蜜蜂的影响。
Science. 2017 Jun 30;356(6345):1393-1395. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa1190.
8
Ecological and genetic basis of metapopulation persistence of the Glanville fritillary butterfly in fragmented landscapes.生态和遗传基础对破碎景观中报喜斑粉蝶种群持续的影响。
Nat Commun. 2017 Feb 17;8:14504. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14504.
9
ECOLOGY. Butterfly communities under threat.生态学。蝴蝶群落面临威胁。
Science. 2016 Jul 15;353(6296):216-8. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf8838.
10
Butterfly community shifts over two centuries.两个世纪以来蝴蝶群落的变化。
Conserv Biol. 2016 Aug;30(4):754-62. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12656. Epub 2016 Jan 6.