• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[使用新一代人工韧带进行前交叉韧带重建的核心技术与不良事件:基于改良德尔菲法的中国专家共识(第2部分)]

[Core techniques and adverse events in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a new generation of artificial ligaments: the consensus of Chinese specialists based on a modified Delphi method (Part 2)].

机构信息

.

出版信息

Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Sep 15;36(9):1047-1055. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202206026.

DOI:10.7507/1002-1892.202206026
PMID:36111464
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9626301/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using a new generation of artificial ligaments (NGAL) gained popularity in China owing to its good effectiveness and early functional recovery, but iatrogenic surgical failures and preconceived misconceptions have seriously affected its standardized clinical application. A specialist consensus is now developed to provide guidance and reference for orthopaedic sports medicine doctors when adopting or considering the NGAL for ACL reconstruction.

METHODS

The consensus on the core techniques and adverse events in ACL reconstruction using the NGAL was developed by a modified Delphi method, referring exclusively to the NGAL for ACL reconstruction approved by the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA). Consensus specialists were selected from the members of the Chinese Association of Orthopaedic Surgeons (CAOS) and the Chinese Society of Sports Medicine (CSSM). The drafting team summarized the draft consensus terms based on medical evidence and organized rounds of investigation: two rounds of online questionnaire investigation and the final round of face-to-face meeting. After discussion, revision, and voting, a consensus on the draft consensus term was reached when the agreement rate exceeded 85%. The consensus terms were categorized as "strong" (agreement rate: 95.0%-100%), "moderate" (agreement rate: 90.0%-94.9%), and "basic" (agreement rate: 85.0%-89.9%).

RESULTS

Thirty-one specialists completed the questionnaire investigation. They all practiced in university teaching hospitals (Grade-A tertiary hospitals) from 16 provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities in China. Among them, 28 were chief physicians and 3 were associate chief physicians; 22 were professors and 7 were associate professors; the average seniority in orthopedic sports medicine was 25.2 years (range, 12-40 years); the average seniority in performing ACL reconstruction procedures was 13.2 years (range, 7-23 years); in terms of the number of ACL reconstruction using the NGAL, 18 completed more than 100 cases, of which 6 had more than 300 cases; in terms of research, 28 had published more than 1 related paper in the past 5 years, of which 13 had published more than 3 related papers. Twenty-six specialists attended the face-to-face meeting and reached a consensus on 9 terms, including 8 strong terms and 1 moderate term.

CONCLUSION

ACL reconstruction using the NGAL must deploy "isometric" or "near-isometric" reconstruction and should preserve the natural ACL remnants as much as possible. Bone tunnel positioning can be performed using intraoperative radiographic measurements or the lateral femoral intercondylar ridge as reference marks. Incorrect positioning of the bone tunnel is the main reason of surgical failure, and there is a lack of consensus on handling interference screws during revision. Bone tunnel enlargement exists after reconstruction but rarely causes related symptoms. Synovitis and infection are uncommon complications. The aging effect of polyethylene terephthalate fiber on the long-term clinical outcomes is unknown and deserves attention.

摘要

目的

新一代人工韧带(NGAL)用于前交叉韧带(ACL)重建因疗效良好且功能恢复早而在中国受到欢迎,但医源性手术失败和先入为主的误解严重影响了其标准化临床应用。现制定专家共识,为骨科运动医学医生采用或考虑使用NGAL进行ACL重建提供指导和参考。

方法

采用改良德尔菲法,专门针对国家药品监督管理局(NMPA)批准的用于ACL重建的NGAL,制定关于使用NGAL进行ACL重建的核心技术和不良事件的共识。共识专家从中国骨科医师协会(CAOS)和中国运动医学学会(CSSM)的成员中选取。起草团队基于医学证据总结共识草案条款,并组织多轮调查:两轮在线问卷调查和最后一轮面对面会议。经讨论、修订和投票,当同意率超过85%时达成对共识草案条款的共识。共识条款分为“强”(同意率:95.0%-100%)、“中”(同意率:90.0%-94.9%)和“基本”(同意率:85.0%-89.9%)。

结果

31名专家完成问卷调查。他们均在中国16个省、自治区、直辖市的大学教学医院(三级甲等医院)执业。其中,28名是主任医师,3名是副主任医师;22名是教授,7名是副教授;骨科运动医学平均资历为25.2年(范围12-40年);进行ACL重建手术的平均资历为13.2年(范围7-23年);就使用NGAL进行ACL重建的数量而言,18名完成超过100例,其中6名超过300例;在研究方面,28名在过去5年发表过1篇以上相关论文,其中13名发表过3篇以上相关论文。26名专家参加了面对面会议,就9项条款达成共识,包括8项强条款和1项中条款。

结论

使用NGAL进行ACL重建必须采用“等长”或“近等长”重建,并应尽可能保留天然ACL残端。骨隧道定位可采用术中影像学测量或股骨外侧髁间嵴作为参考标志。骨隧道定位错误是手术失败的主要原因,翻修时处理干扰螺钉缺乏共识。重建后存在骨隧道扩大,但很少引起相关症状。滑膜炎和感染是少见的并发症。聚对苯二甲酸乙二酯纤维的老化效应对长期临床结果的影响未知,值得关注。

相似文献

1
[Core techniques and adverse events in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a new generation of artificial ligaments: the consensus of Chinese specialists based on a modified Delphi method (Part 2)].[使用新一代人工韧带进行前交叉韧带重建的核心技术与不良事件:基于改良德尔菲法的中国专家共识(第2部分)]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Sep 15;36(9):1047-1055. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202206026.
2
Multirater agreement of the causes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction failure: a radiographic and video analysis of the MARS cohort.前交叉韧带重建失败原因的多评估者一致性:MARS队列的影像学和视频分析
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Feb;43(2):310-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546514560880. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
3
[BTB allograft for revision surgery of the anterior cruciate ligament - part 2].[用于前交叉韧带翻修手术的骨-髌腱-骨同种异体移植-第2部分]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2005;72(5):297-303.
4
Diagnosis and treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries: Consensus of Chinese experts part II: Graft selection and clinical outcome evaluation.前交叉韧带损伤的诊断与治疗:中国专家共识 第二部分:移植物选择与临床疗效评估
J Orthop Translat. 2024 Aug 23;48:163-175. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2024.07.002. eCollection 2024 Sep.
5
Two-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Bone Graft Options for Tunnel Augmentation.两阶段翻修前交叉韧带重建:隧道增强骨移植物选择的系统评价。
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Mar;48(3):767-777. doi: 10.1177/0363546519841583. Epub 2019 May 22.
6
Utilization of Osseous Landmarks for Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Femoral Tunnel Placement.利用骨性标志进行解剖学前交叉韧带股骨隧道定位
J Knee Surg. 2017 May;30(4):359-363. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1592150. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
7
The Effect of Remnant Preservation on Tibial Tunnel Enlargement in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Polyethylene Terephthalate Artificial Ligament in a Large Animal Model.在大型动物模型中,使用聚对苯二甲酸乙二酯人工韧带进行前交叉韧带重建时,残余物保留对胫骨隧道扩大的影响。
J Knee Surg. 2019 Nov;32(11):1094-1101. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1675599. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
8
A Randomized Controlled Trial of PEEK Versus Titanium Interference Screws for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With 2-Year Follow-up.PEEK 与钛干扰螺钉在前交叉韧带重建中的随机对照研究:2 年随访结果。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Aug;47(10):2386-2393. doi: 10.1177/0363546519861530. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
9
Revision surgery in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cohort study of 17,682 patients from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register.前交叉韧带重建翻修手术:一项对瑞典国家膝关节韧带登记处17682名患者的队列研究。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 May;25(5):1542-1554. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4399-0. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
10
Remnants-preserving ACL reconstruction using direct tendinous graft fixation: a new rat model.保留残端的 ACL 重建:使用直接肌腱移植物固定:一种新的大鼠模型。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Jan 5;17(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02890-9.

引用本文的文献

1
The Hybrid Transtibial Technique Using the LARS Device in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.在初次前交叉韧带重建中使用LARS装置的混合经胫骨技术
Video J Sports Med. 2023 Jul 19;3(4):26350254231176827. doi: 10.1177/26350254231176827. eCollection 2023 Jul-Aug.
2
Early clinical outcomes of all-inside arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autograft tendon augmentation using the LARS internal brace ligament.使用LARS内置支撑韧带自体肌腱增强技术进行全关节镜下前交叉韧带重建的早期临床结果
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025 Apr 15;13:1556106. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1556106. eCollection 2025.
3
Diagnosis and treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries: Consensus of Chinese experts part II: Graft selection and clinical outcome evaluation.前交叉韧带损伤的诊断与治疗:中国专家共识 第二部分:移植物选择与临床疗效评估
J Orthop Translat. 2024 Aug 23;48:163-175. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2024.07.002. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Four-year comparative analysis of return to sport and psychological recovery following ACL revision: Artificial ligament vs. anterior tibial tendon allograft.前交叉韧带翻修术后恢复运动及心理康复的四年对比分析:人工韧带与胫骨前肌腱同种异体移植的比较
J Orthop Translat. 2024 Jun 18;47:29-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2024.05.003. eCollection 2024 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Vancomycin presoaking of hamstring autografts to prevent infection in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a narrative review.自体腘绳肌腱移植万古霉素预浸预防前交叉韧带重建感染:一项叙述性综述
EFORT Open Rev. 2021 Mar 1;6(3):211-216. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200059. eCollection 2021 Mar.
2
Inclination of Blumensaat's line influences on the accuracy of the quadrant method in evaluation for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Blumensaat 线倾斜度对前交叉韧带重建中象限法评估准确性的影响。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Jun;28(6):1885-1893. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05619-8. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
3
Medium-Term (Least 5 Years) Comparative Outcomes in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using 4SHG, Allograft, and LARS Ligament.使用4SHG、同种异体移植物和LARS韧带进行前交叉韧带重建的中期(至少5年)比较结果
Clin J Sport Med. 2021 Mar 1;31(2):e101-e110. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000730.
4
LARS versus hamstring tendon autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a single-centre, single surgeon retrospective study with 8 years of follow-up.前交叉韧带重建中LARS人工韧带与自体腘绳肌腱移植的比较:一项单中心、单术者的8年随访回顾性研究。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019 Feb;29(2):447-453. doi: 10.1007/s00590-018-2304-x. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
5
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with LARS Artificial Ligament-Clinical Results after a Long-Term Follow-Up.LARS人工韧带重建前交叉韧带——长期随访后的临床结果
Joints. 2018 May 23;6(2):75-79. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1653950. eCollection 2018 Jun.
6
Anterior cruciate ligament remnant and its values for preservation.前交叉韧带残端及其保留价值。
Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol. 2016 Oct 28;7:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.asmart.2016.09.002. eCollection 2017 Jan.
7
Clinical results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with ligament remnant tissue preservation: A systematic review.保留韧带残端组织的前交叉韧带重建的临床结果:一项系统评价。
Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol. 2016 Apr 26;4:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.asmart.2016.04.001. eCollection 2016 Apr.
8
Status and headway of the clinical application of artificial ligaments.人工韧带临床应用的现状与进展
Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol. 2015 Feb 9;2(1):15-26. doi: 10.1016/j.asmart.2014.11.001. eCollection 2015 Jan.
9
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Mechanoreceptors and their Potential Importance in Remnant-Preserving Reconstruction: A Review of Basic Science and Clinical Findings.前交叉韧带机械感受器及其在保留残端重建中的潜在重要性:基础科学与临床研究结果综述
J Knee Surg. 2018 Sep;31(8):736-746. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1608941. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
10
Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.前交叉韧带重建翻修术
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Oct 4;99(19):1689-1696. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00412.