College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Department of General Medicine, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 19;12(9):e059905. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059905.
Up to 50% of heart failure (HF) patients may be frail and have worse clinical outcomes than non-frail patients. The benefits of HF-specific pharmacotherapy (beta-blockers, ACE-inhibitors/angiotensin-receptor-blockers and mineralocorticoid-receptor-antagonist) in this population are unclear. This study explored whether HF-specific pharmacotherapy improves outcomes in frail hospitalised HF patients.
Observational, multicentre, cross-sectional study.
Tertiary care hospitals.
One thousand four hundred and six hospitalised frail HF patients admitted between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2020.
The Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) determined frailty status and patients with HFRS ≥5 were classified as frail. The primary outcomes included the days alive and out of hospital (DAOH) at 90 days following discharge, 30-day and 180-day mortality, length of hospital stay (LOS) and 30-day readmissions. Propensity score matching (PSM) compared clinical outcomes depending on the receipt of HF-specific pharmacotherapy.
Of 5734 HF patients admitted over a period of 8 years, 1406 (24.5%) were identified as frail according to the HFRS and were included in this study. Of 1406 frail HF patients, 1025 (72.9%) received HF-specific pharmacotherapy compared with 381 (27.1%) who did not receive any of these medications. Frail HF patients who did not receive HF-specific pharmacotherapy were significantly older, with higher creatinine and brain natriuretic peptide but with lower haemoglobin and albumin levels (p<0.05) when compared with those frail patients who received HF medications. After PSM frail patients on treatment were more likely to have an increased DAOH (coefficient 16.18, 95% CI 6.32 to 26.04, p=0.001) than those who were not on treatment. Both 30-day (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.39, p<0.001) and 180-day mortality (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.54, p<0.001) were significantly lower in frail patients on HF treatment but, there were no significant differences in LOS and 30-day readmissions (p>0.05).
This study found an association between the use of HF-specific pharmacotherapy and improved clinical outcomes in frail HF hospitalised patients when compared to those who were not on treatment.
ANZCTRN383195.
多达 50%的心衰(HF)患者可能身体虚弱,临床结局比非虚弱患者差。HF 特异性药物治疗(β受体阻滞剂、ACEI/ARB 和盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂)对该人群的益处尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨 HF 特异性药物治疗是否改善虚弱住院 HF 患者的结局。
观察性、多中心、横断面研究。
三级护理医院。
2013 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日期间收治的 1406 名虚弱住院 HF 患者。
采用医院衰弱风险评分(HFRS)确定衰弱状态,HFRS≥5 分的患者被归类为衰弱。主要结局包括出院后 90 天的存活天数和院外天数(DAOH)、30 天和 180 天死亡率、住院时间(LOS)和 30 天再入院率。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)比较接受 HF 特异性药物治疗和未接受治疗的患者的临床结局。
在 8 年期间,5734 名 HF 患者中,根据 HFRS 确定 1406 名(24.5%)为虚弱患者,并纳入本研究。在 1406 名虚弱 HF 患者中,1025 名(72.9%)接受了 HF 特异性药物治疗,381 名(27.1%)未接受任何此类药物治疗。与接受 HF 药物治疗的患者相比,未接受 HF 特异性药物治疗的虚弱 HF 患者年龄更大,肌酐和脑钠肽水平更高,但血红蛋白和白蛋白水平更低(p<0.05)。PSM 后,接受治疗的虚弱患者的 DAOH 增加(系数 16.18,95%CI 6.32 至 26.04,p=0.001)的可能性高于未接受治疗的患者。与未接受治疗的患者相比,30 天(OR 0.30,95%CI 0.23 至 0.39,p<0.001)和 180 天死亡率(OR 0.43,95%CI 0.33 至 0.54,p<0.001)均显著降低,但 LOS 和 30 天再入院率(p>0.05)无显著差异。
与未接受治疗的患者相比,HF 特异性药物治疗与虚弱住院 HF 患者的临床结局改善相关。
ANZCTRN383195。