School of Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, New South Wales, Australia
College of Health & Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 19;12(9):e061513. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061513.
General practitioners (GPs) and their staff have been at the frontline of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in Australia. However, their experiences of responding to and managing the risks of viral transmission within their facilities are poorly described. The aim of this study was to describe the experiences, and infection prevention and control (IPC) strategies adopted by general practices, including enablers of and challenges to implementation, to contribute to our understanding of the pandemic response in this critical sector.
Semistructured interviews were conducted in person, by telephone or online video conferencing software, between November 2020 and August 2021.
Twenty general practice personnel working in New South Wales, Australia, including nine GPs, one general practice registrar, four registered nurses, one nurse practitioner, two practice managers and two receptionists.
Participants described implementing wide-ranging repertoires of IPC strategies-including telehealth, screening of patients and staff, altered clinic layouts and portable outdoor shelters, in addition to appropriate use of personal protective equipment (PPE)-to manage the demands of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Strategies were proactive, influenced by the varied contexts of different practices and the needs and preferences of individual GPs as well as responsive to local, state and national requirements, which changed frequently as the pandemic evolved.
Using the 'hierarchy of controls' as a framework for analysis, we found that the different strategies adopted in general practice often functioned in concert with one another. Most strategies, particularly administrative and PPE controls, were subjected to human variability and so were less reliable from a human factors perspective. However, our findings highlight the creativity, resilience and resourcefulness of general practice staff in developing, implementing and adapting their IPC strategies amidst constantly changing pandemic conditions.
全科医生(GP)及其工作人员一直处于澳大利亚 SARS-CoV-2 大流行的前线。然而,他们在应对和管理其设施内病毒传播风险方面的经验却鲜有描述。本研究旨在描述全科实践的经验,以及所采用的感染预防和控制(IPC)策略,包括实施的促进因素和挑战,以增进我们对这一关键领域大流行应对的理解。
2020 年 11 月至 2021 年 8 月期间,通过面对面、电话或在线视频会议软件对澳大利亚新南威尔士州的 20 名全科实践人员进行了半结构化访谈。
包括 9 名全科医生、1 名全科医生住院医师、4 名注册护士、1 名护士从业者、2 名诊所经理和 2 名接待员在内的 20 名全科实践人员。
参与者描述了实施广泛的 IPC 策略,包括远程医疗、对患者和工作人员的筛查、改变诊所布局和便携式户外避难所,以及适当使用个人防护设备(PPE),以应对 SARS-CoV-2 大流行的需求。这些策略是积极主动的,受到不同实践环境的影响,也受到个别全科医生的需求和偏好的影响,同时还响应了当地、州和国家的要求,这些要求随着大流行的发展而经常变化。
使用“控制层次”作为分析框架,我们发现全科实践中采用的不同策略通常相互配合。大多数策略,特别是行政和 PPE 控制,受到人为因素的影响,因此从人为因素的角度来看不太可靠。然而,我们的研究结果强调了全科医生在不断变化的大流行环境中制定、实施和调整其 IPC 策略时的创造力、适应力和应变能力。