• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚医护人员对 SARS-CoV-2 大流行的体验:从压力源到保护因素。

Experiences of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic amongst Australian healthcare workers: from stressors to protective factors.

机构信息

Sunshine Coast Health Institute, Birtinya, Queensland, Australia; School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Sydney Centre for Healthy Societies, School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

J Hosp Infect. 2022 Mar;121:75-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2021.12.002. Epub 2021 Dec 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhin.2021.12.002
PMID:34902500
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8662954/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has critically challenged healthcare systems globally. Examining the experiences of healthcare workers (HCWs) is important for optimizing ongoing and future pandemic responses.

OBJECTIVES

In-depth exploration of Australian HCWs' experiences of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, with a focus on reported stressors vis-à-vis protective factors.

METHODS

Individual interviews were performed with 63 HCWs in Australia. A range of professional streams and operational staff were included. Thematic analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Thematic analysis identified stressors centred on paucity of, or changing, evidence, leading to absence of, or mistrust in, guidelines; unprecedented alterations to the autonomy and sense of control of clinicians; and deficiencies in communication and support. Key protective factors included: the development of clear guidance from respected clinical leaders or recognized clinical bodies, interpersonal support, and strong teamwork, leadership, and a sense of organizational preparedness.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides insights into the key organizational sources of emotional stress for HCWs within pandemic responses and describes experiences of protective factors. HCWs experiencing unprecedented uncertainty, fear, and rapid change, rely on clear communication, strong leadership, guidelines endorsed by recognized expert groups or individuals, and have increased reliance on interpersonal support. Structured strategies for leadership and communication at team, service group and organizational levels, provision of psychological support, and consideration of the potential negative effects of centralizing control, would assist in ameliorating the extreme pressures of working within a pandemic environment.

摘要

背景

SARS-CoV-2 大流行对全球医疗保健系统构成了严峻挑战。研究医疗保健工作者(HCWs)的经验对于优化当前和未来的大流行应对措施至关重要。

目的

深入探讨澳大利亚 HCWs 在 SARS-CoV-2 大流行期间的经历,重点关注报告的压力源与保护因素。

方法

对澳大利亚的 63 名 HCWs 进行了个体访谈。包括了各种专业领域和运营人员。进行了主题分析。

结果

主题分析确定了以缺乏或不断变化的证据为中心的压力源,导致缺乏或不信任指南;临床医生的自主权和控制感发生了前所未有的改变;沟通和支持不足。关键的保护因素包括:来自受尊敬的临床领导者或公认的临床机构的明确指导、人际支持以及强大的团队合作、领导力和组织准备感。

结论

本研究深入了解了大流行应对措施中 HCWs 面临的主要组织性情绪压力源,并描述了保护因素的经验。HCWs 经历了前所未有的不确定性、恐惧和快速变化,依赖于清晰的沟通、强大的领导力、得到公认的专家组或个人认可的指南,并且更加依赖于人际支持。在团队、服务组和组织层面制定领导力和沟通策略、提供心理支持,并考虑集中控制的潜在负面影响,将有助于缓解大流行环境下工作的极端压力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c49/8662954/d2b2123279a0/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c49/8662954/d2b2123279a0/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c49/8662954/d2b2123279a0/gr1_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Experiences of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic amongst Australian healthcare workers: from stressors to protective factors.澳大利亚医护人员对 SARS-CoV-2 大流行的体验:从压力源到保护因素。
J Hosp Infect. 2022 Mar;121:75-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2021.12.002. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
2
"One minute it's an airborne virus, then it's a droplet virus, and then it's like nobody really knows…": Experiences of pandemic PPE amongst Australian healthcare workers.“一分钟它还是空气传播病毒,然后又变成飞沫传播病毒,然后就好像没人真正知道……”:澳大利亚医护人员对抗疫个人防护装备的体验。
Infect Dis Health. 2022 May;27(2):71-80. doi: 10.1016/j.idh.2021.10.005. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
3
A longitudinal qualitative exploration of victorian healthcare workers' and organisations' evolving views and experiences during COVID-19.一项针对维多利亚时代医疗工作者及其组织在 COVID-19 期间不断变化的观点和经验的纵向定性探索。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 May 7;24(1):596. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11067-z.
4
A qualitative study on safety perception among healthcare workers of a tertiary academic care center during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.SARS-CoV-2 大流行期间,一家三级学术护理中心医护人员的安全感知定性研究。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2022 Feb 8;11(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13756-022-01068-0.
5
Infection prevention and control in Dutch general practices before and during the COVID-19 pandemic and its implications for pandemic preparedness and seasonal respiratory epidemics: a qualitative study on lessons learned.荷兰普通实践中 COVID-19 大流行前后的感染预防和控制及其对大流行准备和季节性呼吸道传染病的影响:一项关于经验教训的定性研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Jun 20;25(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02451-z.
6
From chaos to control - experiences of healthcare workers during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic: a focus group study.从混乱到控制——COVID-19 大流行早期医护人员的经历:一项焦点小组研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Nov 10;21(1):1219. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07248-9.
7
What do healthcare workers need? A qualitative study on support strategies to protect mental health of healthcare workers during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.医护人员需要什么?一项关于支持策略的定性研究,以保护 SARS-CoV-2 大流行期间医护人员的心理健康。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 24;23(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04686-z.
8
Organizational responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Victoria, Australia: A qualitative study across four healthcare settings.澳大利亚维多利亚州应对 COVID-19 大流行的组织反应:四个医疗保健环境中的定性研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 29;10:965664. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.965664. eCollection 2022.
9
Perceptions and experiences of healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK.英国医护人员在 COVID-19 大流行期间的看法和经历。
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 5;10(11):e040503. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040503.
10
Stressors faced by healthcare professionals and coping strategies during the early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany.德国新冠疫情早期医护人员面临的压力源及应对策略
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 18;17(1):e0261502. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261502. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
A longitudinal qualitative exploration of victorian healthcare workers' and organisations' evolving views and experiences during COVID-19.一项针对维多利亚时代医疗工作者及其组织在 COVID-19 期间不断变化的观点和经验的纵向定性探索。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 May 7;24(1):596. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11067-z.
2
Local management of the COVID-19 pandemic in Norway: a longitudinal interview study of municipality chief medical officers.挪威 COVID-19 大流行的地方管理:对市首席医疗官的纵向访谈研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2024 Mar;42(1):214-224. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2023.2301562. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
3
Organizational responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Victoria, Australia: A qualitative study across four healthcare settings.

本文引用的文献

1
The COVID-19 pandemic: resilient organisational response to a low-chance, high-impact event.新冠疫情:组织对低概率、高影响事件的弹性应对。
BMJ Lead. 2020 Sep 28;4(3):109-112. doi: 10.1136/leader-2020-000245. Epub 2020 May 18.
2
High levels of psychosocial distress among Australian frontline healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey.新冠疫情期间澳大利亚一线医护人员的高度心理社会困扰:一项横断面调查
Gen Psychiatr. 2021 Sep 6;34(5):e100577. doi: 10.1136/gpsych-2021-100577. eCollection 2021.
3
Experiences of frontline healthcare workers and their views about support during COVID-19 and previous pandemics: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis.
澳大利亚维多利亚州应对 COVID-19 大流行的组织反应:四个医疗保健环境中的定性研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 29;10:965664. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.965664. eCollection 2022.
4
'Like building a plane and flying it all in one go': an interview study of infection prevention and control in Australian general practice during the first 2 years of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.“就像一次性地建造一架飞机并驾驶它飞行一样”:对 SARS-CoV-2 大流行的头 2 年期间澳大利亚全科医学中的感染预防和控制进行的一项访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 19;12(9):e061513. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061513.
5
Paradoxes of pandemic infection control: Proximity, pace and care within and beyond SARS-CoV-2.大流行感染控制的悖论:SARS-CoV-2 内外的距离、速度与关怀
SSM Qual Res Health. 2022 Dec;2:100110. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100110. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
一线医护人员在 COVID-19 疫情及以往大流行期间的经历及其对支持的看法:系统评价和定性荟萃分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Sep 6;21(1):923. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06917-z.
4
The Impact of Epidemics and Pandemics on the Mental Health of Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review.流行病和大流行病对医护人员心理健康的影响:一项系统综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 22;18(13):6695. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18136695.
5
Relational autonomy: lessons from COVID-19 and twentieth-century philosophy.关系自治:来自 COVID-19 和二十世纪哲学的教训。
Med Health Care Philos. 2021 Dec;24(4):493-505. doi: 10.1007/s11019-021-10035-2. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
6
Mental burden and its risk and protective factors during the early phase of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: systematic review and meta-analyses.SARS-CoV-2 大流行早期的精神负担及其风险和保护因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Global Health. 2021 Mar 29;17(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12992-021-00670-y.
7
Characteristics and outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients during the first 28 days of the spring and autumn pandemic waves in Milan: An observational prospective study.在米兰春、秋两季大流行波的前 28 天住院 COVID-19 患者的特征和结局:一项观察性前瞻性研究。
Respir Med. 2021 Mar;178:106323. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2021.106323. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
8
How can we build and maintain the resilience of our health care professionals during COVID-19? Recommendations based on a scoping review.在 COVID-19 期间,我们如何建立和维持医疗保健专业人员的韧性?基于范围综述的建议。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 6;11(1):e043718. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043718.
9
The impact of SARS-CoV-2 on the mental health of healthcare workers in a hospital setting-A Systematic Review.SARS-CoV-2 对医院环境中医护人员心理健康的影响——一项系统评价。
J Occup Health. 2020 Jan;62(1):e12175. doi: 10.1002/1348-9585.12175.
10
Efficacy of an online cognitive behavioral therapy program developed for healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: the REduction of STress (REST) study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一项针对 COVID-19 大流行期间医护人员开发的在线认知行为疗法项目的疗效:一项随机对照试验的 REduction of STress(REST)研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Oct 21;21(1):870. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04772-7.