• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与酒后驾车相关的认知过程及判断中的个体差异。

Cognitive processes and individual differences in judgments relevant to drunk driving.

作者信息

Jaccard J, Turrisi R

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Jul;53(1):133-45.

PMID:3612486
Abstract

The present study explored cognitive processes in judgments of drunkenness relative to legally allowable blood alcohol levels for driving. Judgments were based on the manipulation of three cues in hypothetical scenarios in a 3 X 4 X 3 factorial design (Type of Drink X Number of Drinks X Time to Consume). In addition, personality and behavioral characteristics influencing the accuracy of judgments of drunkenness relative to true blood alcohol levels were examined. Results indicated the presence of several misperceptions and inappropriate response tendencies that potentially can be modified with educational efforts.

摘要

本研究探讨了与法定驾驶允许血液酒精水平相关的醉酒判断中的认知过程。判断基于3×4×3析因设计(饮料类型×饮酒量×饮酒时间)的假设情景中三个线索的操纵。此外,还研究了影响相对于真实血液酒精水平的醉酒判断准确性的人格和行为特征。结果表明存在几种误解和不适当的反应倾向,通过教育努力可能会得到改善。

相似文献

1
Cognitive processes and individual differences in judgments relevant to drunk driving.与酒后驾车相关的认知过程及判断中的个体差异。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Jul;53(1):133-45.
2
Examination of judgments of drunkenness, binge drinking, and drunk-driving tendencies in teens with and without a family history of alcohol abuse.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1999 Jul;23(7):1191-8.
3
The importance of self-regulatory and goal-conflicting processes in the avoidance of drunk driving among Greek young drivers.自我调节和目标冲突过程在希腊年轻驾驶员避免酒后驾车中的重要性。
Accid Anal Prev. 2008 May;40(3):1191-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2008.01.002. Epub 2008 Feb 4.
4
Predicting drunk driving: contribution of alcohol use and related problems, traffic behaviour, personality and platelet monoamine oxidase (MAO) activity.预测酒后驾车:酒精使用及相关问题、交通行为、人格和血小板单胺氧化酶(MAO)活性的作用
Alcohol Alcohol. 2005 Mar-Apr;40(2):140-6. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agh135. Epub 2005 Jan 17.
5
Cognitive preoccupation with alcohol and binge drinking in college students: alcohol-induced priming of the motivation to drink.大学生对酒精和暴饮的认知关注:酒精引发的饮酒动机
Psychol Addict Behav. 2001 Dec;15(4):325-32.
6
How do Zero Tolerance Drunk Driving Laws work?零容忍酒驾法律是如何实施的?
J Health Econ. 2004 Jan;23(1):61-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2003.08.005.
7
[Alcohol intoxication at the wheel in the Waadt canton (Switzerland).A comparative study of penal and administrative measures 1970 and 1989 in the canton capital city (Lausanne) and a rural area].[瑞士沃州驾车时酒精中毒情况。1970年和1989年在该州首府城市(洛桑)及一个农村地区针对刑事和行政措施的比较研究]
Blutalkohol. 1993 Sep;30(5):266-89.
8
Acute alcohol tolerance on subjective intoxication and simulated driving performance in binge drinkers.酗酒者主观醉酒状态下的急性酒精耐受性及模拟驾驶表现
Psychol Addict Behav. 2009 Jun;23(2):238-47. doi: 10.1037/a0014633.
9
Attribution of responsibility for alcohol-related offenses.与酒精相关犯罪的责任归属。
Psychol Rep. 1997 Jun;80(3 Pt 2):1159-65. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1997.80.3c.1159.
10
[Drinking and driving].[酒后驾车]
Harefuah. 1997 Feb 2;132(3):162-7, 240.

引用本文的文献

1
Context, acute tolerance, and subjective response affect alcohol-impaired driving decisions.语境、急性耐受和主观反应会影响酒后驾驶决策。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2020 Dec;237(12):3603-3614. doi: 10.1007/s00213-020-05639-0. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
2
Perceived safety of cannabis intoxication predicts frequency of driving while intoxicated.吸食大麻后感知到的安全性可预测大麻致醉后驾驶的频率。
Prev Med. 2020 Feb;131:105956. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105956. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
3
Predictors of alcohol consumption among in-school adolescents in the Central Region of Ghana: A baseline information for developing cognitive-behavioural interventions.
加纳中部地区在校青少年饮酒预测因素:制定认知行为干预措施的基线信息。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 12;13(11):e0207093. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207093. eCollection 2018.
4
How estimation of drinking influences alcohol-related consequences across the first year of college.饮酒量的估计如何影响大学一年级期间与酒精相关的后果。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2014 Apr;38(4):1160-6. doi: 10.1111/acer.12351. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
5
An Examination of the Mediational Effects of Cognitive and Attitudinal Factors of a Parent Intervention to Reduce College Drinking.一项关于家长干预减少大学生饮酒的认知和态度因素的中介作用的研究。
J Appl Soc Psychol. 2010 Oct 1;40(10):2500-2526. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00668.x.
6
Have I had one drink too many? Assessing gender differences in misperceptions of intoxication among college students.我是不是喝得有点多了?评估大学生醉酒认知偏差中的性别差异。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2009 Nov;70(6):964-70. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2009.70.964.
7
Binge drinking in young adults: Data, definitions, and determinants.年轻人的暴饮:数据、定义及决定因素。
Psychol Bull. 2009 Jan;135(1):142-56. doi: 10.1037/a0014414.
8
Perceptions of level of intoxication and risk related to drinking and driving.对醉酒程度以及与酒后驾车相关风险的认知。
Addict Behav. 2008 Apr;33(4):605-15. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.11.010. Epub 2007 Nov 17.
9
Do we learn from our mistakes? An examination of the impact of negative alcohol-related consequences on college students' drinking patterns and perceptions.我们能从错误中吸取教训吗?关于与酒精相关的负面后果对大学生饮酒模式及认知的影响的研究。
J Stud Alcohol. 2006 Mar;67(2):269-76. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2006.67.269.
10
Examination of cognitive variables relevant to sunscreen use.
J Behav Med. 1999 Oct;22(5):493-509. doi: 10.1023/a:1018609524523.