• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

受众反应作为说服中的一种启发式线索。

Audience response as a heuristic cue in persuasion.

作者信息

Axsom D, Yates S, Chaiken S

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Jul;53(1):30-40. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.53.1.30.

DOI:10.1037//0022-3514.53.1.30
PMID:3612491
Abstract

Previous research on the persuasive impact of an overheard audience has yielded conflicting results. In this study, we attempted to understand such audience effects within the framework of the heuristic model of persuasion. Subjects listened to an audiotaped persuasive message that conveyed arguments of either high or low quality and that was responded to by either an enthusiastic or an unenthusiastic overheard audience. In addition, subject involvement (high vs. low) was varied. Consistent with predictions, the audience response cue influenced postmessage opinions only under low involvement; under high involvement, only argument quality affected persuasion. Analyses that took into account subjects' need for cognition supported the additional hypothesis that individuals lower in need for cognition would be more responsive to the audience manipulation under low involvement. Thought-listing data and regression analyses provided further support for the heuristic model.

摘要

先前关于无意中听到的受众的说服效果的研究得出了相互矛盾的结果。在本研究中,我们试图在说服启发式模型的框架内理解这种受众效应。受试者收听了一段录音的说服性信息,该信息传达了高质量或低质量的论据,并且由一个热情或不热情的无意中听到的受众做出回应。此外,受试者的参与度(高与低)也有所不同。与预测一致,受众反应线索仅在低参与度下影响信息后的观点;在高参与度下,只有论据质量影响说服力。考虑到受试者认知需求的分析支持了额外的假设,即认知需求较低的个体在低参与度下对受众操纵的反应会更强。思维列表数据和回归分析为启发式模型提供了进一步的支持。

相似文献

1
Audience response as a heuristic cue in persuasion.受众反应作为说服中的一种启发式线索。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Jul;53(1):30-40. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.53.1.30.
2
When expertise backfires: contrast and assimilation effects in persuasion.当专业知识适得其反:说服中的对比和同化效应。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2002 Dec;41(Pt 4):495-519. doi: 10.1348/014466602321149858.
3
The persuasion network is modulated by drug-use risk and predicts anti-drug message effectiveness.说服网络受药物使用风险的调节,并预测反毒品信息的效果。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017 Dec 1;12(12):1902-1915. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsx126.
4
Persuasive communication about AIDS prevention: need for cognition determines the impact of message format.关于艾滋病预防的说服性沟通:认知需求决定信息形式的影响。
AIDS Educ Prev. 1999 Apr;11(2):150-62.
5
In search of reliable persuasion effects: III. The sleeper effect is dead. Long live the sleeper effect.探寻可靠的说服效果:三、休眠效应已死。休眠效应万岁。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Feb;54(2):203-18. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.2.203.
6
The effects of majority versus minority source status on persuasion: a self-validation analysis.多数派与少数派来源地位对说服的影响:自我验证分析。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Sep;99(3):498-512. doi: 10.1037/a0018626.
7
Relevance override: on the reduced impact of "cues" under high-motivation conditions of persuasion studies.关联优先效应:关于说服研究中高动机条件下“线索”的影响减弱
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Feb;86(2):251-64. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.251.
8
Message sidedness in advertising: the moderating roles of need for cognition and time pressure in persuasion.广告中的信息偏向:认知需求和时间压力在说服中的调节作用。
Scand J Psychol. 2011 Aug;52(4):329-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2011.00882.x.
9
The sleeper effect in persuasion: a meta-analytic review.说服中的睡眠者效应:一项元分析综述。
Psychol Bull. 2004 Jan;130(1):143-72. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.1.143.
10
Social and cognitive strategies for coping with accountability: conformity, complexity, and bolstering.应对问责的社会与认知策略:从众、复杂化与强化。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989 Oct;57(4):632-40. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.57.4.632.

引用本文的文献

1
Laughter and effective presidential leadership: A case study of Ronald Reagan as the 'great communicator'.笑声与有效的总统领导:以“伟大的沟通者”罗纳德·里根为例。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 17;19(4):e0301324. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301324. eCollection 2024.
2
Acculturation and market integration are associated with greater trust among Tanzanian Maasai pastoralists.文化适应和市场整合与坦桑尼亚马赛牧民之间更高的信任度相关。
Evol Hum Sci. 2021 Feb 10;3:e15. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2021.10. eCollection 2021.
3
"Domestic Drama," "Love Killing," or "Murder": Does the Framing of Femicides Affect Readers' Emotional and Cognitive Responses to the Crime?
“家庭剧”“情杀”还是“谋杀”:杀妻案的表述方式会影响读者对该罪行的情感和认知反应吗?
Violence Against Women. 2024 Aug;30(10):2609-2631. doi: 10.1177/10778012231158103. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
4
Thinking Against Burnout? An Individual's Tendency to Engage in and Enjoy Thinking as a Potential Resilience Factor of Burnout Symptoms and Burnout-Related Impairment in Executive Functioning.对抗职业倦怠?个体参与并享受思考的倾向作为职业倦怠症状及与职业倦怠相关的执行功能损害的潜在复原力因素
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 12;10:420. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00420. eCollection 2019.
5
Group Polarization Revisited: A Processing Effort Account.群体极化再探:一个加工努力的解释。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2019 Oct;45(10):1482-1498. doi: 10.1177/0146167219833389. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
6
Candidate Performance and Observable Audience Response: Laughter and Applause-Cheering During the First 2016 Clinton-Trump Presidential Debate.候选人表现与可观察到的观众反应:2016年首次克林顿-特朗普总统辩论期间的笑声与掌声欢呼
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 20;9:1182. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01182. eCollection 2018.
7
Individual versus group decision making: Jurors' reliance on central and peripheral information to evaluate expert testimony.个体决策与群体决策:陪审员在评估专家证词时对核心信息和边缘信息的依赖
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 20;12(9):e0183580. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183580. eCollection 2017.
8
Strategies and motives for resistance to persuasion: an integrative framework.抵制说服的策略与动机:一个综合框架。
Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 14;6:1201. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01201. eCollection 2015.
9
I spy with my little eye: jurors' detection of internal validity threats in expert evidence.我用我的小眼睛侦察:陪审员对专家证据中内部有效性威胁的察觉。
Law Hum Behav. 2010 Dec;34(6):489-500. doi: 10.1007/s10979-010-9219-3.