Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 May;21(5):1330-1337.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.09.008. Epub 2022 Sep 17.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) emerged as rescue treatment for multiply recurrent Clostridioides difficile infections (rCDIs) nonresponsive to standard therapy. However, estimation of FMT efficacy varies among different protocols and formulations, while placebo-controlled clinical trials have excluded most rCDI patients because of medical comorbidities. This study aimed to determine the safety and effectiveness of capsule FMT (cap-FMT) and colonoscopy FMT (colo-FMT) for rCDI using standardized products in a large, multicenter, prospective, real-world cohort.
Clinical outcomes and adverse events after FMT performed for rCDI at 6 sites were captured in a prospective registry. FMT was performed using 1 of 2 standardized formulations of microbiota manufactured by the University of Minnesota Microbiota Therapeutics Program, freeze-dried/encapsulated or frozen-thawed/liquid. The FMT administration route was determined by the treating physician. The rCDI cure rate was assessed at 1 and 2 months. Safety data were collected within the first 72 hours and at 1 and 2 months. Logistic regression was used to investigate factors associated with FMT failure.
A total of 301 FMTs were performed in 269 unique patients. Two-thirds were cap-FMT. CDI cure rates were 86% (95% CI, 82%-90%) at 1 month and 81% (95% CI, 75%-86%) at 2 months. There was no difference in the 1-month or 2-month cure rate between cap-FMT and colo-FMT. Cap-FMT recipients were older and less likely to be immunosuppressed or have inflammatory bowel disease. Patient factors of older age and hemodialysis were associated with FMT failure by 2 months on multivariate logistic regression. In addition, post-FMT antibiotic use was associated with FMT failure at 2 months. One serious adverse event was related to colonoscopy (aspiration pneumonia), otherwise no new safety signals were identified.
Cap-FMT using freeze-dried capsules has a similar safety and effectiveness profile compared with colo-FMT, without the procedural risks of colonoscopy. Although highly effective overall, patient selection is a key factor to optimizing FMT success.
粪便微生物群移植(FMT)作为对标准治疗无反应的多重复发艰难梭菌感染(rCDI)的抢救治疗方法出现。然而,不同方案和制剂的 FMT 疗效估计存在差异,而安慰剂对照临床试验因医疗合并症而排除了大多数 rCDI 患者。本研究旨在使用标准化产品,在一个大型、多中心、前瞻性、真实世界的队列中,确定胶囊 FMT(cap-FMT)和结肠镜 FMT(colo-FMT)治疗 rCDI 的安全性和有效性。
在 6 个地点进行 rCDI 的前瞻性注册中,记录 FMT 后的临床结果和不良事件。FMT 使用明尼苏达大学微生物组治疗计划制造的 2 种标准化微生物制剂之一进行,冻干/包封或冷冻解冻/液体。FMT 给药途径由治疗医生决定。rCDI 的治愈率在 1 个月和 2 个月时评估。安全性数据在最初的 72 小时内和 1 个月和 2 个月时收集。使用逻辑回归分析与 FMT 失败相关的因素。
共进行了 301 次 FMT 治疗 269 例患者。其中三分之二为 cap-FMT。1 个月时 CDI 治愈率为 86%(95%CI,82%-90%),2 个月时为 81%(95%CI,75%-86%)。1 个月和 2 个月时 cap-FMT 和 colo-FMT 的治愈率无差异。cap-FMT 受者年龄较大,免疫抑制或炎症性肠病的可能性较小。多变量逻辑回归显示,2 个月时患者年龄较大和血液透析是 FMT 失败的相关因素。此外,FMT 后使用抗生素与 2 个月时 FMT 失败相关。1 例严重不良事件与结肠镜检查相关(吸入性肺炎),否则未发现新的安全性信号。
使用冻干胶囊的 cap-FMT 与 colo-FMT 具有相似的安全性和有效性,没有结肠镜检查的程序风险。尽管总体上非常有效,但患者选择是优化 FMT 成功的关键因素。