• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同局部麻醉剂配方的弹性透明质酸填充剂的患者舒适度、安全性和有效性。

Patient Comfort, Safety, and Effectiveness of Resilient Hyaluronic Acid Fillers Formulated With Different Local Anesthetics.

机构信息

Skin Research Institute, LLC, Coral Gables, Florida.

Clinical Testing of Beverly Hills, Beverly Hills, California.

出版信息

Dermatol Surg. 2022 Oct 1;48(10):1065-1070. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000003541. Epub 2022 Jul 13.

DOI:10.1097/DSS.0000000000003541
PMID:36129233
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9521576/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Maximizing patient comfort during hyaluronic acid gel injection is a common concern that is usually addressed by selecting fillers with lidocaine.

OBJECTIVE

Two randomized, double-blinded, split-face trials aimed to demonstrate noninferiority of specific hyaluronic acid fillers incorporating mepivacaine (RHA-M) versus their lidocaine controls, at providing pain relief.

METHODS

Thirty subjects per trial received injections of RHA R -M versus RHA R , and RHA4-M versus RHA4, respectively, in the perioral rhytids (PR) and nasolabial folds (NLF). Pain was assessed on a visual analog scale; aesthetic effectiveness was evaluated with validated scales, and safety was monitored based on common treatment responses (CTRs) and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

RHA-M fillers proved as effective as their lidocaine counterparts at reducing pain (noninferior, p < .0002 and p < .0001). Bilateral wrinkle improvement was measured both in the PR (-1.5 ± 0.6 points on each side) and in the NLF (-1.8 ± 0.6 and -1.9 ± 0.5 points) trials at one month, with virtually identical responder rates (≥96.7%). Common treatment responses and AEs were similar between treated sides, and none was clinically significant.

CONCLUSION

Resilient hyaluronic acid fillers with either mepivacaine or lidocaine are equally effective at reducing pain during treatment and equally performant and safe for correction of dynamic facial wrinkles and folds.

摘要

背景

在透明质酸凝胶注射过程中最大限度地提高患者舒适度是一个常见的关注点,通常通过选择含有利多卡因的填充物来解决。

目的

两项随机、双盲、对照的分割面试验旨在证明含有甲哌卡因的特定透明质酸填充物(RHA-M)与含有利多卡因的对照填充物(RHA-R 和 RHA4-M 与 RHA4)在提供疼痛缓解方面具有非劣效性。

方法

每个试验中,30 名受试者分别接受 RHA-R-M 与 RHA-R 以及 RHA4-M 与 RHA4 在口周皱纹(PR)和鼻唇沟(NLF)中的注射。使用视觉模拟量表评估疼痛;使用经过验证的量表评估美学效果,并根据常见治疗反应(CTR)和不良反应(AE)监测安全性。

结果

RHA-M 填充物在减轻疼痛方面与含有利多卡因的对照填充物一样有效(非劣效,p <.0002 和 p <.0001)。在一个月时,在 PR(每侧 -1.5 ± 0.6 分)和 NLF(-1.8 ± 0.6 和 -1.9 ± 0.5 分)试验中均测量到双侧皱纹改善,应答率几乎相同(≥96.7%)。治疗侧之间的常见治疗反应和不良反应相似,且均无临床意义。

结论

含有甲哌卡因或利多卡因的弹性透明质酸填充物在治疗过程中减轻疼痛方面同样有效,并且对于纠正动态面部皱纹和褶皱同样有效且安全。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7e4/9521576/c3a61b180644/ds-48-1065-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7e4/9521576/1118dedd2b40/ds-48-1065-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7e4/9521576/c3a61b180644/ds-48-1065-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7e4/9521576/1118dedd2b40/ds-48-1065-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7e4/9521576/c3a61b180644/ds-48-1065-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient Comfort, Safety, and Effectiveness of Resilient Hyaluronic Acid Fillers Formulated With Different Local Anesthetics.不同局部麻醉剂配方的弹性透明质酸填充剂的患者舒适度、安全性和有效性。
Dermatol Surg. 2022 Oct 1;48(10):1065-1070. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000003541. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
2
Efficacy and Safety of Two Resilient Hyaluronic Acid Fillers in the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Nasolabial Folds: A 64-Week, Prospective, Multicenter, Controlled, Randomized, Double-Blinded, and Within-Subject Study.两种高弹性透明质酸填充剂治疗中重度鼻唇沟皱纹的疗效和安全性:一项 64 周、前瞻性、多中心、对照、随机、双盲、自身对照研究。
Dermatol Surg. 2020 Dec;46(12):1521-1529. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000002391.
3
Reduced pain with injection of hyaluronic acid with pre-incorporated lidocaine for nasolabial fold correction: A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, active-controlled, split-face designed, clinical study.预先掺入利多卡因的透明质酸注射用于鼻唇沟矫正时疼痛减轻:一项多中心、双盲、随机、活性对照、半脸设计的临床研究。
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020 Dec;19(12):3229-3233. doi: 10.1111/jocd.13421. Epub 2020 May 16.
4
The Efficacy and Safety of HA IDF Plus (with Lidocaine) Versus HA IDF (Without Lidocaine) in Nasolabial Folds Injection: A Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Split-Face Study.含利多卡因的透明质酸真皮填充剂加(HA IDF Plus)与不含利多卡因的透明质酸真皮填充剂(HA IDF)用于鼻唇沟注射的疗效和安全性:一项随机、多中心、双盲、半脸对照研究。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2017 Apr;41(2):422-428. doi: 10.1007/s00266-016-0769-8. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
5
Efficacy and Safety of 3 New Resilient Hyaluronic Acid Fillers, Crosslinked With Decreased BDDE, for the Treatment of Dynamic Wrinkles: Results of an 18-Month, Randomized Controlled Trial Versus Already Available Comparators.三种新型低1,4-丁二醇缩水甘油醚交联的弹性透明质酸填充剂治疗动态皱纹的疗效和安全性:一项为期18个月的随机对照试验结果与现有对照品的比较
Dermatol Surg. 2019 Oct;45(10):1304-1314. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001971.
6
Clinical comparison between two hyaluronic acid-derived fillers in the treatment of nasolabial folds in Chinese subjects: BioHyalux versus Restylane.两种透明质酸填充剂治疗中国受试者鼻唇沟的临床比较:润致美与瑞蓝。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2016 Apr;308(3):145-51. doi: 10.1007/s00403-016-1630-2. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
7
A multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new monophasic hyaluronic acid filler with lidocaine 0.3% in the correction of nasolabial fold.一项多中心、随机、双盲临床研究,旨在评估含0.3%利多卡因的新型单相透明质酸填充剂矫正鼻唇沟的疗效和安全性。
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2017 Sep;16(3):327-332. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12310. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
8
A multi-center comparative efficacy and safety study of two different hyaluronic acid fillers for treatment of nasolabial folds in a Chinese population.一项多中心、比较两种不同透明质酸填充剂治疗中国人群鼻唇沟皱纹的疗效和安全性的研究。
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2019 Jun;18(3):755-761. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12916. Epub 2019 May 10.
9
Comparison of Hyaluronic Acid Gel With (HARDL) and Without Lidocaine (HAJUP) in the Treatment of Moderate-To-Severe Nasolabial Folds: A Randomized, Evaluator-Blinded Study.含利多卡因透明质酸凝胶(HARDL)与不含利多卡因透明质酸凝胶(HAJUP)治疗中重度鼻唇沟的比较:一项随机、评估者盲法研究。
Dermatol Surg. 2018 Jun;44(6):833-840. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001424.
10
Effectiveness and Safety of Resilient Hyaluronic Acid (RHA) Dermal Fillers for the Correction of Moderate-to-Severe Nasolabial Folds in People of Color: Post Hoc Subgroup Analyses of US Pivotal Clinical Data.弹性透明质酸(RHA)真皮填充剂矫正中重度鼻唇沟的有效性和安全性:美国关键临床数据的事后亚组分析。
Aesthet Surg J. 2024 Mar 15;44(4):412-420. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjad251.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety and Potential Complications of Facial Wrinkle Correction with Dermal Fillers: A Systematic Literature Review.使用真皮填充剂进行面部皱纹矫正的安全性及潜在并发症:一项系统文献综述
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Dec 27;61(1):25. doi: 10.3390/medicina61010025.
2
Comparative Preclinical Study of Lidocaine and Mepivacaine in Resilient Hyaluronic Acid Fillers.利多卡因和甲哌卡因在弹性透明质酸填充剂中的临床前比较研究。
Pharmaceutics. 2022 Jul 26;14(8):1553. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14081553.