• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

PI-RADS v2.1 在经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)病史患者中的诊断价值。

The Diagnostic Value of PI-RADS v2.1 in Patients with a History of Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP).

机构信息

Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200127, China.

Department of Imaging, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200127, China.

出版信息

Curr Oncol. 2022 Sep 5;29(9):6373-6382. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29090502.

DOI:10.3390/curroncol29090502
PMID:36135071
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9497547/
Abstract

To explore the diagnostic value of the Prostate Imaging−Reporting and Data System version 2.1 (PI-RADS v2.1) for clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPCa) in patients with a history of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), we conducted a retrospective study of 102 patients who underwent systematic prostate biopsies with TURP history. ROC analyses and logistic regression analyses were performed to demonstrate the diagnostic value of PI-RADS v2.1 and other clinical characteristics, including PSA and free/total PSA (F/T PSA). Of 102 patients, 43 were diagnosed with CSPCa. In ROC analysis, PSA, F/T PSA, and PI-RADS v2.1 demonstrated significant diagnostic value in detecting CSPCa in our cohort (AUC 0.710 (95%CI 0.608−0.812), AUC 0.768 (95%CI 0.676−0.860), AUC 0.777 (95%CI 0.688−0.867), respectively). Further, PI-RADS v2.1 scores of the peripheral and transitional zones were analyzed separately. In ROC analysis, PI-RADS v2.1 remained valuable in identifying peripheral-zone CSPCa (AUC 0.780 (95%CI 0.665−0.854; p < 0.001)) while having limited capability in distinguishing transitional zone lesions (AUC 0.533 (95%CI 0.410−0.557; p = 0.594)). PSA and F/T PSA retain significant diagnostic value for CSPCa in patients with TURP history. PI-RADS v2.1 is reliable for detecting peripheral-zone CSPCa but has limited diagnostic value when assessing transitional zone lesions.

摘要

为了探究经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)病史患者中前列腺影像报告和数据系统 2.1 版(PI-RADS v2.1)对临床显著前列腺癌(CSPCa)的诊断价值,我们对 102 例接受 TURP 病史下系统前列腺活检的患者进行了回顾性研究。我们进行了 ROC 分析和逻辑回归分析,以展示 PI-RADS v2.1 以及其他临床特征(包括 PSA 和游离/总 PSA(F/T PSA))的诊断价值。在 102 例患者中,有 43 例被诊断为 CSPCa。在 ROC 分析中,PSA、F/T PSA 和 PI-RADS v2.1 在我们的队列中对 CSPCa 的检测均具有显著的诊断价值(AUC 为 0.710(95%CI 为 0.608-0.812),AUC 为 0.768(95%CI 为 0.676-0.860),AUC 为 0.777(95%CI 为 0.688-0.867))。此外,我们还分别分析了外周带和移行带的 PI-RADS v2.1 评分。在 ROC 分析中,PI-RADS v2.1 在外周带 CSPCa 的识别中仍然具有价值(AUC 为 0.780(95%CI 为 0.665-0.854;p<0.001)),而在外周带病变的鉴别中能力有限(AUC 为 0.533(95%CI 为 0.410-0.557;p=0.594))。PSA 和 F/T PSA 对 TURP 病史患者的 CSPCa 仍然具有显著的诊断价值。PI-RADS v2.1 在外周带 CSPCa 的检测中可靠,但在评估移行带病变时诊断价值有限。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/816e/9497547/f0a7e32ad005/curroncol-29-00502-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/816e/9497547/99ddaa8f11c2/curroncol-29-00502-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/816e/9497547/df75b058ba81/curroncol-29-00502-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/816e/9497547/8a76f79374b7/curroncol-29-00502-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/816e/9497547/f0a7e32ad005/curroncol-29-00502-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/816e/9497547/99ddaa8f11c2/curroncol-29-00502-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/816e/9497547/df75b058ba81/curroncol-29-00502-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/816e/9497547/8a76f79374b7/curroncol-29-00502-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/816e/9497547/f0a7e32ad005/curroncol-29-00502-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
The Diagnostic Value of PI-RADS v2.1 in Patients with a History of Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP).PI-RADS v2.1 在经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)病史患者中的诊断价值。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Sep 5;29(9):6373-6382. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29090502.
2
Can the addition of clinical information improve the accuracy of PI-RADS version 2 for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in positive MRI?临床信息的加入能否提高 PI-RADS 版本 2 对 MRI 阳性中临床显著前列腺癌的诊断准确性?
Clin Radiol. 2020 Feb;75(2):157.e1-157.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.09.139. Epub 2019 Nov 2.
3
[The diagnostic value of version 2.1 prostate imaging reporting and data system for prostate transitional zone lesions].[2.1版前列腺影像报告和数据系统对前列腺移行区病变的诊断价值]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Dec 8;100(45):3609-3613. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20200506-01442.
4
Cutoff Values of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1 Score in Men With Prostate-specific Antigen Level 4 to 10 ng/mL: Importance of Lesion Location.前列腺影像报告和数据系统第 2.1 版评分在前列腺特异性抗原水平为 4 至 10ng/mL 男性中的截断值:病变位置的重要性。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2021 Aug;19(4):288-295. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.12.007. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
5
Diagnostic value of combining PI-RADS v2.1 with PSAD in clinically significant prostate cancer.PI-RADS v2.1 联合 PSAD 对临床显著前列腺癌的诊断价值。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022 Oct;47(10):3574-3582. doi: 10.1007/s00261-022-03592-4. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
6
Using the prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 (PI-RIDS v2) to detect prostate cancer can prevent unnecessary biopsies and invasive treatment.采用前列腺影像报告和数据系统第 2 版(PI-RADS v2)检测前列腺癌可以避免不必要的活检和侵袭性治疗。
Asian J Androl. 2018 Sep-Oct;20(5):459-464. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_19_18.
7
How to make clinical decisions to avoid unnecessary prostate screening in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADs v2 score ≤ 3?如何在 PI-RADS v2 评分≤3 的初次活检无前列腺癌的男性中做出临床决策以避免不必要的前列腺筛查?
Int J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan;25(1):175-186. doi: 10.1007/s10147-019-01524-9. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
8
Development of a nomogram combining multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and PSA-related parameters to enhance the detection of clinically significant cancer across different region.开发一种结合多参数磁共振成像和前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)相关参数的列线图,以提高不同区域临床显著性癌症的检测率。
Prostate. 2022 Apr;82(5):556-565. doi: 10.1002/pros.24302. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
9
Diagnostic Accuracy and Interobserver Agreement of PI-RADS Version 2 and Version 2.1 for the Detection of Transition Zone Prostate Cancers.PI-RADS 版本 2 和版本 2.1 对检测移行区前列腺癌的诊断准确性和观察者间一致性。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 May;216(5):1247-1256. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.23883. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
10
Structured approach to resolving discordance between PI-RADS v2.1 score and targeted prostate biopsy results: an opportunity for quality improvement.采用结构化方法解决 PI-RADS v2.1 评分与靶向前列腺活检结果之间的差异:提高质量的机会。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022 Aug;47(8):2917-2927. doi: 10.1007/s00261-022-03562-w. Epub 2022 Jun 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Combination of PI-RADS version 2.1 and amide proton transfer values for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.PI-RADS v2.1与酰胺质子转移值联合用于检测具有临床意义的前列腺癌
BMC Cancer. 2025 Jul 30;25(1):1249. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14610-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Lesion Volume in a Bi- or Multivariate Prediction Model for the Management of PI-RADS v2.1 Score 3 Category Lesions.用于PI-RADS v2.1评分3类病变管理的二元或多变量预测模型中的病变体积
Turk J Urol. 2022 Jul;48(4):268-277. doi: 10.5152/tud.2022.22038.
2
Avoiding Unnecessary Biopsy: MRI-based Risk Models versus a PI-RADS and PSA Density Strategy for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.避免不必要的活检:基于 MRI 的风险模型与 PI-RADS 和 PSA 密度策略在临床显著前列腺癌中的应用。
Radiology. 2021 Aug;300(2):369-379. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021204112. Epub 2021 May 25.
3
Diagnostic performance of PI-RADS version 2.1 compared to version 2.0 for detection of peripheral and transition zone prostate cancer.
PI-RADS 版本 2.1 与版本 2.0 对检测外周带和移行区前列腺癌的诊断性能比较。
Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 29;10(1):15982. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-72544-z.
4
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment After Therapy in Prostate Cancer.前列腺癌治疗后的磁共振成像评估
Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 Feb;29(1):47-58. doi: 10.1097/RMR.0000000000000231.
5
Cancer statistics, 2020.癌症统计数据,2020 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jan;70(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
6
Post-treatment prostate MRI.治疗后前列腺 MRI。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020 Jul;45(7):2184-2197. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-02348-x.
7
Variation in Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsy Outcomes in Asian American Men: A Multicenter Study.磁共振成像-超声融合靶向活检在亚裔美国男性中的结果存在差异:一项多中心研究。
J Urol. 2020 Mar;203(3):530-536. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000534. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
8
Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1: 2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.前列腺影像报告和数据系统第 2.1 版:前列腺影像报告和数据系统第 2 版 2019 年更新。
Eur Urol. 2019 Sep;76(3):340-351. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.033. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
9
Use of prostate systematic and targeted biopsy on the basis of multiparametric MRI in biopsy-naive patients (MRI-FIRST): a prospective, multicentre, paired diagnostic study.基于多参数 MRI 的前列腺系统和靶向活检在初次活检患者中的应用(MRI-FIRST):一项前瞻性、多中心、配对诊断研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Jan;20(1):100-109. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30569-2. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
10
Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators.多参数磁共振成像预测高级别前列腺癌:改善鹿特丹欧洲前列腺癌筛查风险计算器研究的风险预测。
Eur Urol. 2019 Feb;75(2):310-318. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.07.031. Epub 2018 Aug 3.