Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200127, China.
Department of Imaging, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200127, China.
Curr Oncol. 2022 Sep 5;29(9):6373-6382. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29090502.
To explore the diagnostic value of the Prostate Imaging−Reporting and Data System version 2.1 (PI-RADS v2.1) for clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPCa) in patients with a history of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), we conducted a retrospective study of 102 patients who underwent systematic prostate biopsies with TURP history. ROC analyses and logistic regression analyses were performed to demonstrate the diagnostic value of PI-RADS v2.1 and other clinical characteristics, including PSA and free/total PSA (F/T PSA). Of 102 patients, 43 were diagnosed with CSPCa. In ROC analysis, PSA, F/T PSA, and PI-RADS v2.1 demonstrated significant diagnostic value in detecting CSPCa in our cohort (AUC 0.710 (95%CI 0.608−0.812), AUC 0.768 (95%CI 0.676−0.860), AUC 0.777 (95%CI 0.688−0.867), respectively). Further, PI-RADS v2.1 scores of the peripheral and transitional zones were analyzed separately. In ROC analysis, PI-RADS v2.1 remained valuable in identifying peripheral-zone CSPCa (AUC 0.780 (95%CI 0.665−0.854; p < 0.001)) while having limited capability in distinguishing transitional zone lesions (AUC 0.533 (95%CI 0.410−0.557; p = 0.594)). PSA and F/T PSA retain significant diagnostic value for CSPCa in patients with TURP history. PI-RADS v2.1 is reliable for detecting peripheral-zone CSPCa but has limited diagnostic value when assessing transitional zone lesions.
为了探究经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)病史患者中前列腺影像报告和数据系统 2.1 版(PI-RADS v2.1)对临床显著前列腺癌(CSPCa)的诊断价值,我们对 102 例接受 TURP 病史下系统前列腺活检的患者进行了回顾性研究。我们进行了 ROC 分析和逻辑回归分析,以展示 PI-RADS v2.1 以及其他临床特征(包括 PSA 和游离/总 PSA(F/T PSA))的诊断价值。在 102 例患者中,有 43 例被诊断为 CSPCa。在 ROC 分析中,PSA、F/T PSA 和 PI-RADS v2.1 在我们的队列中对 CSPCa 的检测均具有显著的诊断价值(AUC 为 0.710(95%CI 为 0.608-0.812),AUC 为 0.768(95%CI 为 0.676-0.860),AUC 为 0.777(95%CI 为 0.688-0.867))。此外,我们还分别分析了外周带和移行带的 PI-RADS v2.1 评分。在 ROC 分析中,PI-RADS v2.1 在外周带 CSPCa 的识别中仍然具有价值(AUC 为 0.780(95%CI 为 0.665-0.854;p<0.001)),而在外周带病变的鉴别中能力有限(AUC 为 0.533(95%CI 为 0.410-0.557;p=0.594))。PSA 和 F/T PSA 对 TURP 病史患者的 CSPCa 仍然具有显著的诊断价值。PI-RADS v2.1 在外周带 CSPCa 的检测中可靠,但在评估移行带病变时诊断价值有限。