From the Department of Physical Therapy, Hunter College, The City University of New York, NY (S.R.B.).
Neurology, Stroke Unit, Burke Rehabilitation Hospital, White Plains, NY (S.R.B., M.R.).
Stroke. 2019 May;50(5):1067-1073. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023445.
Background and Purpose- Hemispheric stroke studies associating lateropulsion (pusher syndrome) with the location of brain lesions have had mixed results from small, unmatched samples. This study was designed to determine whether lateropulsion localizes to specific brain regions across patients with stroke using a case-control design. Methods- Fifty patients with lateropulsion after stroke were matched with 50 stroke patients without lateropulsion using age, time since onset of stroke, admission motor Functional Independence Measure score, lesion side, and gender. The primary analysis included multivariate lesion symptom mapping using sparse canonical correlations to identify regions most associated with lateropulsion as assessed with the Burke Lateropulsion Scale. Secondary analyses included evaluating paired comparisons for lesion volume, degree of motor impairment, motor and cognitive Functional Independence Measure scores. Results- The lesion symptom mapping analysis of all lesions mapped onto a common hemisphere produced an overall significant model ( P<5×10) with a regional peak at the inferior parietal lobe at the junction of the post-central gyrus (Brodmann Area 2) and Brodmann Area 40 as the lesion location most associated with lateropulsion. Lesion volume was larger for patients with lateropulsion. Despite adequate matching, motor performance and total Functional Independence Measure scores differed at a group level between patients with and without lateropulsion. Conclusions- This analysis implicated lesion involvement of the inferior parietal lobe as a key neuroanatomical determinant of developing lateropulsion. A better understanding of the anatomic underpinnings of lateropulsion may improve rehabilitation efforts, including the potential for informing noninvasive neuromodulation approaches.
背景与目的——将偏瘫侧推动(推动综合征)与脑损伤部位相关联的半球性脑卒中研究,其结果因小样本、不匹配而存在差异。本研究旨在通过病例对照设计,确定偏瘫侧推动是否可定位到脑卒中患者的特定脑区。
方法——50 例脑卒中后出现偏瘫侧推动的患者与 50 例无偏瘫侧推动的脑卒中患者进行年龄、脑卒中发病时间、入院时运动功能独立性测量评分、损伤侧和性别匹配。主要分析包括稀疏规范相关分析的多变量损伤症状映射,以确定与 Burke 偏瘫侧推动量表评估的偏瘫侧推动最相关的区域。次要分析包括评估损伤体积、运动损伤程度、运动和认知功能独立性测量评分的配对比较。
结果——对所有损伤进行的病变症状映射分析映射到一个共同的半球,产生了一个整体显著的模型(P<5×10),区域峰值位于后中央回交界处的下顶叶(Brodmann 区域 2)和 Brodmann 区域 40,这是与偏瘫侧推动最相关的损伤位置。偏瘫侧推动患者的损伤体积更大。尽管进行了充分的匹配,但偏瘫侧推动患者和无偏瘫侧推动患者的运动表现和总功能独立性测量评分在组间存在差异。
结论——本分析表明,下顶叶的损伤累及是发生偏瘫侧推动的关键神经解剖学决定因素。更好地了解偏瘫侧推动的解剖学基础,可能会改善康复治疗,包括为非侵入性神经调节方法提供潜在信息。