• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Community Mitigation Strategies, Mobility, and COVID-19 Incidence Across Three Waves in the United States in 2020.2020 年美国三个波次的社区缓解策略、流动性与 COVID-19 发病率。
Epidemiology. 2023 Jan 1;34(1):131-139. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001553. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
2
Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic.学校为控制 COVID-19 疫情而采取的措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 17;1(1):CD015029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015029.
3
Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses.物理干预措施以阻断或减少呼吸道病毒的传播。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 30;1(1):CD006207. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6.
4
Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS-CoV-2.抗体检测用于鉴定 SARS-CoV-2 的现症感染和既往感染。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 17;11(11):CD013652. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013652.pub2.
5
Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断的快速、即时抗原检测。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 22;7(7):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub3.
6
Risk of thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19 who are using hormonal contraception.COVID-19 患者使用激素避孕的血栓栓塞风险。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 9;1(1):CD014908. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014908.pub2.
7
Effects of city design on transport mode choice and exposure to health risks during and after a crisis: a retrospective observational analysis.危机期间及之后城市设计对交通方式选择和健康风险暴露的影响:一项回顾性观察分析
Lancet Planet Health. 2025 Jun;9(6):e467-e479. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(25)00088-9.
8
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
9
Exercise for acutely hospitalised older medical patients.急性住院老年医学患者的运动治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 10;11(11):CD005955. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005955.pub3.
10
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Tuberculosis Diagnostic Delays and Treatment Outcomes among Patients with COVID-19, California, USA, 2020.2020 年美国加利福尼亚州 COVID-19 患者的结核病诊断延迟和治疗结果。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2024 Jan;30(1):136-140. doi: 10.3201/eid3001.230924.

本文引用的文献

1
Interactive COVID-19 Mobility Impact and Social Distancing Analysis Platform.交互式新冠疫情出行影响与社交距离分析平台
Transp Res Rec. 2023 Apr;2677(4):168-180. doi: 10.1177/03611981211043813. Epub 2021 Sep 18.
2
Ideology and compliance with health guidelines during the COVID-19 pandemic: A comparative perspective.新冠疫情期间的意识形态与对健康指南的遵守:比较视角
Soc Sci Q. 2021 Sep;102(5):2106-2123. doi: 10.1111/ssqu.13035. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
3
Walking the party line: The growing role of political ideology in shaping health behavior in the United States.遵循党派路线:政治意识形态在美国塑造健康行为方面日益重要的作用。
SSM Popul Health. 2021 Oct 23;16:100950. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100950. eCollection 2021 Dec.
4
A worldwide assessment of changes in adherence to COVID-19 protective behaviours and hypothesized pandemic fatigue.一项针对 COVID-19 防护行为依从性变化和假设的大流行疲劳的全球评估。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Sep;5(9):1145-1160. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01181-x. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
5
The influence of gain-loss framing and its interaction with political ideology on social distancing and mask wearing compliance during the COVID-19 pandemic.在新冠疫情期间,得失框架及其与政治意识形态的相互作用对社交距离和口罩佩戴合规性的影响。
Curr Psychol. 2023;42(10):8028-8038. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-02148-x. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
6
Spatial association of mobility and COVID-19 infection rate in the USA: A county-level study using mobile phone location data.美国流动性与新冠病毒感染率的空间关联:一项使用手机位置数据的县级研究
J Transp Health. 2021 Sep;22:101135. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2021.101135. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
7
Systematic review of empirical studies comparing the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions against COVID-19.系统评价比较非药物干预措施防治 COVID-19 有效性的实证研究。
J Infect. 2021 Sep;83(3):281-293. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2021.06.018. Epub 2021 Jun 20.
8
Impacts of social distancing policies on mobility and COVID-19 case growth in the US.社交隔离政策对美国流动性和 COVID-19 病例增长的影响。
Nat Commun. 2021 May 25;12(1):3118. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23404-5.
9
COVID-19 non-pharmaceutical intervention portfolio effectiveness and risk communication predominance.新冠疫情非药物干预措施组合的有效性及风险沟通的主导作用
Sci Rep. 2021 May 19;11(1):10605. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88309-1.
10
Stay-at-home orders were issued earlier in economically unfree states.在经济不自由的州,更早发布了居家令。
South Econ J. 2021 Apr;87(4):1138-1151. doi: 10.1002/soej.12495. Epub 2021 Feb 25.

2020 年美国三个波次的社区缓解策略、流动性与 COVID-19 发病率。

Community Mitigation Strategies, Mobility, and COVID-19 Incidence Across Three Waves in the United States in 2020.

机构信息

From the Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI.

Department of Biostatistics, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI.

出版信息

Epidemiology. 2023 Jan 1;34(1):131-139. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001553. Epub 2022 Nov 30.

DOI:10.1097/EDE.0000000000001553
PMID:36137192
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9811991/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Summarizing the impact of community-based mitigation strategies and mobility on COVID-19 infections throughout the pandemic is critical for informing responses and future infectious disease outbreaks. Here, we employed time-series analyses to empirically investigate the relationships between mitigation strategies and mobility on COVID-19 incident cases across US states during the first three waves of infections.

METHODS

We linked data on daily COVID-19 incidence by US state from March to December 2020 with the stringency index, a well-known index capturing the strictness of mitigation strategies, and the trip ratio, which measures the ratio of the number of trips taken per day compared with the same day in 2019. We utilized multilevel models to determine the relative impacts of policy stringency and the trip ratio on COVID-19 cumulative incidence and the effective reproduction number. We stratified analyses by three waves of infections.

RESULTS

Every five-point increase in the stringency index was associated with 2.89% (95% confidence interval = 1.52, 4.26%) and 5.01% (3.02, 6.95%) reductions in COVID-19 incidence for the first and third waves, respectively. Reducing the number of trips taken by 50% compared with the same time in 2019 was associated with a 16.2% (-0.07, 35.2%) decline in COVID-19 incidence at the state level during the second wave and 19.3% (2.30, 39.0%) during the third wave.

CONCLUSIONS

Mitigation strategies and reductions in mobility are associated with marked health gains through the reduction of COVID-19 infections, but we estimate variable impacts depending on policy stringency and levels of adherence.

摘要

背景

总结大流行期间基于社区的缓解策略和流动性对 COVID-19 感染的影响对于指导应对措施和未来传染病暴发至关重要。在这里,我们采用时间序列分析方法,从经验上研究了美国各州在感染的前三波中,缓解策略和流动性与 COVID-19 病例之间的关系。

方法

我们将 2020 年 3 月至 12 月美国各州每日 COVID-19 发病率数据与严格性指数(一种著名的捕捉缓解策略严格程度的指数)和旅行比率(一种衡量每日旅行次数与 2019 日相同日相比的比率)相关联。我们利用多层次模型确定政策严格性和旅行比率对 COVID-19 累积发病率和有效繁殖数的相对影响。我们对三波感染进行了分层分析。

结果

严格性指数每增加 5 个点,与第一波和第三波 COVID-19 发病率分别降低 2.89%(95%置信区间=1.52,4.26%)和 5.01%(3.02,6.95%)相关。与 2019 年同期相比,旅行次数减少 50%,与第二波和第三波州级 COVID-19 发病率分别降低 16.2%(-0.07,35.2%)和 19.3%(2.30,39.0%)相关。

结论

缓解策略和流动性的减少通过减少 COVID-19 感染,与显著的健康收益相关,但我们估计根据政策严格性和遵守程度的不同,影响也不同。