• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于多种生态系统服务的热带森林土地规划管理与模拟

Land-planning management based on multiple ecosystem services and simulation in tropical forests.

作者信息

Fan Feifei, Xiao Chiwei, Feng Zhiming, Chen Ying

机构信息

Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China; College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.

Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China; College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China; Key Laboratory of Carrying Capacity Assessment for Resource and Environment, Ministry of Land and Resources, Beijing, 101149, China.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2022 Dec 1;323:116216. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116216. Epub 2022 Sep 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116216
PMID:36137459
Abstract

Forest losses can lead to severe damage to ecosystem services (ESs), especially in the tropics. Tropical forests are widespread in southwestern China, and they experience continual effects of human activities (e.g., rubber boom). However, forest simulations of land planning have not yet been systematically conducted. Based on a future land-use simulation model, here, the spatio-temporal characteristics of four ES (i.e., soil retention, water yield, carbon fixation, and habitat quality) were examined, and three scenarios (i.e., natural development, rubber development, and ecological protection) were designed and evaluated during 2000 for Xishuangbanna (XSBN), southwestern China. The results showed that: (1) from 2000 to 2020, the average values of the ESs declined by 449.1 t for soil retention, 13.4 mm for water yield, 0.1 for habitat quality, and 0.1 kg C/m for carbon fixation; (2) the four ESs, with the exception of water yield, had synergistic relationships, and trade-off appeared on the margins of these synergistic relationships; (3) compared with the scenarios of natural development and rubber development, the environmental protection scenario was found to have high efficiency for protecting nature reserves and reducing fragmentation; and (4) the intensity of land-use change will accelerate the decrease of ESs, and it is essential for nature reserves and areas of northern XSBN to improve their level of environmental protection. This work not only further enriches the ES research from the ecological environment and land-planning points of view, but it also provides different planning perspectives for ES and forest scenarios. This is useful in methodical approaches to forest sustainability.

摘要

森林损失会导致生态系统服务(ESs)受到严重破坏,尤其是在热带地区。中国西南部热带森林分布广泛,且持续受到人类活动的影响(例如橡胶热潮)。然而,尚未系统地开展土地规划的森林模拟研究。在此,基于未来土地利用模拟模型,研究了中国西南部西双版纳(XSBN)2000年至2020年期间四种生态系统服务(即土壤保持、产水量、碳固定和栖息地质量)的时空特征,并设计和评估了三种情景(即自然发展、橡胶发展和生态保护)。结果表明:(1)2000年至2020年期间,土壤保持生态系统服务平均价值下降449.1吨,产水量下降13.4毫米,栖息地质量下降0.1,碳固定下降0.1千克碳/平方米;(2)除产水量外,四种生态系统服务之间存在协同关系,且在这些协同关系的边缘出现了权衡;(3)与自然发展和橡胶发展情景相比,环境保护情景在保护自然保护区和减少破碎化方面具有较高效率;(4)土地利用变化强度将加速生态系统服务的下降,提高西双版纳北部自然保护区和地区的环境保护水平至关重要。这项工作不仅从生态环境和土地规划角度进一步丰富了生态系统服务研究,还为生态系统服务和森林情景提供了不同的规划视角。这对森林可持续性的方法性途径很有用。

相似文献

1
Land-planning management based on multiple ecosystem services and simulation in tropical forests.基于多种生态系统服务的热带森林土地规划管理与模拟
J Environ Manage. 2022 Dec 1;323:116216. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116216. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
2
Spatial-Temporal Variations and Trade-Offs of Ecosystem Services in Anhui Province, China.中国安徽省生态系统服务的时空变化及其权衡关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 3;20(1):855. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010855.
3
Improving ecosystem services supply provides insights for sustainable landscape planning: A case study in Beijing, China.改善生态系统服务供给为可持续景观规划提供了新视角:以中国北京为例。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Jan 1;802:149849. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149849. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
4
Impact and trade off analysis of land use change on spatial pattern of ecosystem services in Chishui River Basin.土地利用变化对赤水河流域生态系统服务空间格局的影响及权衡分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Mar;29(14):20234-20248. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17188-w. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
5
The promotion of sustainable land use planning for the enhancement of ecosystem service capacity: Based on the FLUS-INVEST-RUSLE-CASA model.促进可持续土地利用规划以提高生态系统服务能力:基于 FLUS-INVEST-RUSLE-CASA 模型。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 9;19(7):e0305400. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305400. eCollection 2024.
6
Identification of priority conservation areas based on ecosystem services and systematic conservation planning analysis.基于生态系统服务和系统保护规划分析确定优先保护区域
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(13):36573-36587. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24883-9. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
7
Long-Term Effects of Ecological Restoration Projects on Ecosystem Services and Their Spatial Interactions: A Case Study of Hainan Tropical Forest Park in China.长期生态修复工程对生态系统服务及其空间相互作用的影响:以中国海南热带森林公园为例。
Environ Manage. 2024 Mar;73(3):493-508. doi: 10.1007/s00267-023-01892-z. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
8
[Spatial and temporal variations of ecosystem service synergy and trade-off in Qinling Mountains, China].[中国秦岭地区生态系统服务协同与权衡的时空变化]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2022 Aug;33(8):2057-2067. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202208.019.
9
Response and multiscenario simulation of trade-offs/synergies among ecosystem services to the Grain to Green Program: a case study of the Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration, China.生态系统服务之间权衡/协同效应对于退耕还林工程的响应及多情景模拟:以中国成渝城市群为例
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 May;29(22):33572-33586. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-18336-y. Epub 2022 Jan 14.
10
Analyzing Land-Use Change Scenarios for Ecosystem Services and their Trade-Offs in the Ecological Conservation Area in Beijing, China.分析中国北京生态保护区的土地利用变化情景及其生态系统服务的权衡。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 20;17(22):8632. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228632.