Department of Healthcare Engineering, The Graduate School, Jeonbuk National University, 567 Baekje-daero, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju-si, Jeollabuk-do, Republic of Korea.
Division of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Jeonbuk National University, 567 Baekje-daero, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju-si, Jeollabuk-do, Republic of Korea.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Sep 22;22(Suppl 5):252. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01955-x.
Numerous people never receive a formal dementia diagnosis. This issue can be addressed by early detection systems that utilize alternative forms of classification, such as gait, balance, and sensory function parameters. In the present study, said functions were compared between older adults with healthy cognition, older adults with low executive function, and older adults with cognitive impairment, to determine which parameters can be used to distinguish these groups.
A group of cognitively healthy older men was found to have a significantly greater gait cadence than both the low executive function group (113.1 ± 6.8 vs. 108.0 ± 6.3 steps/min, p = 0.032) and the cognitively impaired group (113.1 ± 6.8 vs. 107.1 ± 7.4 steps/min, p = 0.009). The group with low executive function was found to have more gait stability than the impaired cognition group, represented by the single limb support phase (39.7 ± 1.2 vs. 38.6 ± 1.3%, p = 0.027). Additionally, the healthy cognition group had significantly greater overall postural stability than the impaired cognition group (0.6 ± 0.1 vs. 1.1 ± 0.1, p = 0.003), and the low executive function group had significantly greater mediolateral postural stability than the impaired cognition group (0.2 ± 0.1 vs. 0.6 ± 0.6, p = 0.012). The low executive function group had fewer mistakes on the sentence recognition test than the cognitively impaired (2.2 ± 3.6 vs. 5.9 ± 6.4, p = 0.005). There were no significant differences in visual capacity, however, the low executive function group displayed an overall greatest ability.
Older adults with low executive function showcased a lower walking pace, but their postural stability and sensory functions did not differ from those of the older adults with healthy cognition. The variables concluded as good cognitive status markers were (1) gait cadence for dividing cognitively healthy from the rest and (2) single limb support portion, mediolateral stability index, and the number of mistakes on the sentence recognition test for discerning between the low executive function and cognitive impairment groups.
许多人从未接受过正式的痴呆症诊断。这个问题可以通过利用替代形式的分类,如步态、平衡和感官功能参数的早期检测系统来解决。在本研究中,比较了认知健康的老年人、执行功能低下的老年人和认知障碍的老年人之间的这些功能,以确定哪些参数可以用于区分这些组。
与低执行功能组(113.1±6.8 比 108.0±6.3 步/分钟,p=0.032)和认知障碍组(113.1±6.8 比 107.1±7.4 步/分钟,p=0.009)相比,发现一组认知健康的老年男性的步频明显更高。低执行功能组的单腿支撑阶段的步态稳定性也比认知障碍组更高(39.7±1.2%比 38.6±1.3%,p=0.027)。此外,认知健康组的整体姿势稳定性明显优于认知障碍组(0.6±0.1 比 1.1±0.1,p=0.003),低执行功能组的横向姿势稳定性明显优于认知障碍组(0.2±0.1 比 0.6±0.6,p=0.012)。低执行功能组在句子识别测试中的错误比认知障碍组少(2.2±3.6 比 5.9±6.4,p=0.005)。然而,在视觉能力方面没有显著差异,但低执行功能组表现出最大的整体能力。
低执行功能的老年人行走速度较慢,但他们的姿势稳定性和感官功能与认知健康的老年人没有区别。作为良好认知状态标志物的变量包括(1)用于区分认知健康者和其他人群的步频,(2)单腿支撑部分、横向稳定性指数以及句子识别测试中的错误数量,用于区分低执行功能组和认知障碍组。