Wilkat Max, Hufendiek Karsten, Karahisarlioglu Merve, Borrelli Maria, Sproll Christoph, Rana Majeed
Department for Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
University Eye Hospital, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
J Pers Med. 2022 Aug 27;12(9):1389. doi: 10.3390/jpm12091389.
Proper treatment of the two-wall fractured orbit is still controversial. Specifically, there is no consensus on the issue of the necessity of medial orbital wall repair. With anatomically critical structures at risk during the surgical approach, surgeons' view on the necessity of medial orbital wall repair often is restricted and an aesthetically disturbing enophthalmos is more likely to be accepted. Therefore, treatment options range from leaving the medial wall without repair to reconstruction with autogenous tissue or alloplastic materials, which can lead to moderate to severe side effects. However, emerging technologies such as patient-specific implants (PSI) offer a reliable and anatomically correct reconstruction of the bony orbit. This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of full orbital reconstruction using PSIs compared to only orbital floor repair using PDS (bioresorbable polydioxanone) foils leaving the medial orbital wall untouched in traumatic two-wall orbital fractures. Of all patients treated at the University Hospital of Düsseldorf between 2017 and 2019 who suffered from traumatic orbital fracture, only patients with a two-wall orbital fracture involving both the orbital floor and the medial wall (n = 68) were included. Patients were treated either with a PSI (n = 35) or a PDS foil (n = 33). Primary outcome parameters were ophthalmological disturbances analyzed via clinical investigation and intra-orbital angles, volumes and implant position analyzed with radiological 3D-datasets. While a two-wall reconstruction using PSIs led to a significant improvement of the enophthalmos, the rate of postoperative enophthalmos was significantly increased in cases of only orbital floor repair with PDS foils. Radiologically, a significant reconstruction of the three-dimensional bony orbit succeeded with the simple use of PSIs leading to a significant reduction in the traumatically enlarged orbital volume. PSI also led to a significant reduction in the traumatically enlarged medial angle of the orbit. This was not the case for single-floor repair with PDS foil. The results of this study suggest that complex orbital fractures can be reconstructed at an even higher degree of accuracy with selective laser-melted PSIs than PDS foils. In order to achieve a true to original reconstruction of the bony orbit, surgical treatment of the medial orbital wall can be advocated for in the long term depending on the indication.
两壁骨折性眼眶的恰当治疗仍存在争议。具体而言,关于眶内侧壁修复必要性的问题尚无共识。由于手术入路过程中有解剖学关键结构面临风险,外科医生对眶内侧壁修复必要性的看法往往受限,而美学上令人困扰的眼球内陷更有可能被接受。因此,治疗选择范围从不修复内侧壁到用自体组织或异体材料进行重建,这可能会导致中度至重度的副作用。然而,诸如定制植入物(PSI)等新兴技术能提供可靠且解剖学上正确的眼眶骨重建。本研究旨在评估与仅使用聚对二氧环己酮(PDS,可生物吸收的聚二氧杂环己酮)箔片修复眶底而不触及眶内侧壁相比,使用PSI进行全眼眶重建在创伤性两壁眼眶骨折中的效果。在2017年至2019年期间于杜塞尔多夫大学医院接受治疗的所有外伤性眼眶骨折患者中,仅纳入了眶底和内侧壁均受累的两壁眼眶骨折患者(n = 68)。患者接受PSI治疗(n = 35)或PDS箔片治疗(n = 33)。主要结局参数包括通过临床检查分析的眼科紊乱情况,以及用放射学三维数据集分析的眶内角度、容积和植入物位置。虽然使用PSI进行两壁重建可显著改善眼球内陷,但仅用PDS箔片修复眶底的病例术后眼球内陷发生率显著增加。在放射学上,简单使用PSI成功实现了三维眼眶骨的显著重建,使创伤性增大的眶容积显著减小。PSI还使创伤性增大的眶内侧角显著减小。使用PDS箔片进行单壁修复则未出现这种情况。本研究结果表明,与PDS箔片相比,选择性激光熔融的PSI能以更高的精度重建复杂眼眶骨折。为了实现眼眶骨的原样重建,从长远来看,可根据适应证主张对眶内侧壁进行手术治疗。