Holtmann Henrik, Eren Hatice, Sander Karoline, Kübler Norbert R, Handschel Jörg
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Plastic Surgery of the Face, University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, D-40225, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Department for Oral Surgery, University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, D-40225, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Head Face Med. 2016 Jan 5;12:1. doi: 10.1186/s13005-015-0096-3.
Many reconstruction materials for orbital floor fractures have been described in the past including autologous bone transplants, resorbable polymers and titan meshes. So far evidence is missing which material is used successfully regarding indication and particular size of defect. Therefore the aim of this study was to evaluate which reconstruction technique produces best clinical outcome and least complications associated with indication.
Retrospectively, surgical and ophthalmological data plus CT scans from a collective of 775 patients between 2005 and 2012 were analyzed. Furthermore included patients were sounded on satisfaction and potential problems postoperatively.
Overall 593 patients offered full pre- and postoperative short-time data appropriate to inclusion criteria - of these 507 (85,5 %) underwent primary surgical treatment. Smallest average defect size was found in cases with no indication for surgical treatment (81 mm(2)), largest in cases indicating titanium mesh reconstruction (601.5 mm(2)). In 15 cases exact fragment reposition was possible without insertion of alloplastic material. Best clinical results obtained reconstruction using polydioxanone foil (PDS). 0.15 mm PDS-foil: 444 patients, reduced diplopia pre to postoperative 16 to 6 % (p < 0.01), ex- and enophthalmus < 2 % after surgery. 0.25 mm PDS-foil: 26 patients, reduced diplopia from pre- to postoperative 34,6 to 3,8 % (p < 0.01), postoperative exophthalmus rate was higher than preoperative (3,8 to 7,7 %). In comparison to reconstruction with PDS-foil a higher percentage of patients reconstructed with titanium meshes (n = 22) revealed no significant reduction of diplopia (45,5 to 31,8 %; p = 0.07). Furthermore 63 of all included patients agreed to complete a questionnaire on intermediate-term postoperative symptoms and surgical contentedness. Remarkably 50 % of the patients reconstructed with titanium meshes indicated foreign body sensations and cold feeling in the long-term.
Short- and intermediate-term results of clinical outcome in our patients with surgical treated orbital floor fractures (i.e. diplopia, en- or exophthalmus) reveal that thin resorbable foils, particularly 0.15 mm diameter PDS-foil seem to generate best results referring to orbital floor defects with a size of 250 to 300 mm(2).
Study number 4222, year 2013, ethics committee of the medical faculty of the Heinrich Heine university of Duesseldorf.
过去已描述了多种用于眶底骨折的重建材料,包括自体骨移植、可吸收聚合物和钛网。到目前为止,尚缺乏关于何种材料在特定适应证和缺损大小情况下能成功应用的证据。因此,本研究的目的是评估哪种重建技术能产生最佳临床效果且与适应证相关的并发症最少。
回顾性分析了2005年至2012年间775例患者的手术和眼科数据以及CT扫描结果。此外,还询问了纳入患者术后的满意度和潜在问题。
总体而言,593例患者提供了符合纳入标准的完整术前和术后短期数据,其中507例(85.5%)接受了一期手术治疗。未行手术治疗的病例平均缺损最小(81mm²),提示钛网重建的病例最大(601.5mm²)。15例患者无需植入异体材料即可精确复位骨折碎片。使用聚二氧六环酮箔(PDS)重建获得了最佳临床效果。0.15mm PDS箔:444例患者,术后复视从术前的16%降至6%(p<0.01),术后眼球突出和内陷<2%。0.25mm PDS箔:26例患者,术后复视从术前的34.6%降至3.8%(p<0.),术后眼球突出率高于术前(从3.8%至7.7%)。与PDS箔重建相比,使用钛网重建的患者中更高比例(n = 22)的复视无显著降低(从45.5%至31.8%;p = 0.07)。此外,所有纳入患者中有63例同意填写一份关于术后中期症状和手术满意度的问卷。值得注意的是,50%使用钛网重建患者长期存在异物感和冷感。
我们对手术治疗眶底骨折患者的短期和中期临床结果(即复视、眼球内陷或突出)显示,薄型可吸收箔,尤其是直径0.15mm的PDS箔,对于大小为250至300mm²的眶底缺损似乎能产生最佳效果。
研究编号4222,2013年,杜塞尔多夫海因里希·海涅大学医学院伦理委员会。