Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, D-52074, Aachen, Germany.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Helios St. Josefshospital Uerdingen, Kurfürstenstraße 69, D-47829, Krefeld, Germany.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Oct;50(5):2579-2586. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02585-w. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
The orbital floor is frequently involved in head trauma. Current evidence on the use of reconstruction materials for orbital floor repair is inconclusive. Accordingly, this study aimed to compare the impact of polydioxanone (PDS) foil thickness on reconstruction of the orbital geometry after isolated orbital floor fractures.
Standardized isolated orbital floor fractures were symmetrically created in 11 cadaver heads that provided 22 orbits. PDS foils with thicknesses of 0.25-0.5 mm were inserted. Computed tomography (CT) scans of the native, fractured, and reconstructed orbits were obtained, and orbital volume, orbital height, and foil bending were measured.
Orbital volume and height significantly (p < 0.01) increased after the creation of isolated orbital floor fractures and significantly (p = 0.001) decreased with overcorrection of the orbital geometry after orbital floor reconstruction with PDS 0.25 mm or PDS 0.5 mm. The orbital geometry reconstruction rate did not differ significantly with respect to foil thickness. However, compared to PDS 0.5 mm, the use of PDS 0.25 mm resulted in quantitatively higher reconstructive accuracy and a restored orbital volume that did not significantly differ from the initial volume.
Orbital floors subjected to isolated fractures were successfully reconstructed using PDS regardless of foil thickness, with overcorrection of the orbital geometry. Due to its lower flexural stiffness, PDS 0.25 mm appeared to provide more accurate orbital geometry reconstruction than PDS 0.5 mm, although no significant difference in reconstructive accuracy between PDS 0.25 mm and PDS 0.5 mm was observed in this cadaveric study.
眼眶底部经常受到头部创伤的影响。目前关于使用修复材料修复眼眶底部的证据尚无定论。因此,本研究旨在比较不同厚度聚二氧杂环已酮(PDS)补片对单纯眼眶底部骨折后眼眶几何形状重建的影响。
在 11 个尸体头颅上对称地制造标准化的单纯眼眶底部骨折,提供 22 个眼眶。插入厚度为 0.25-0.5 毫米的 PDS 补片。获取原始、骨折和重建眼眶的计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描,并测量眼眶容积、眼眶高度和补片弯曲度。
单纯眼眶底部骨折形成后,眼眶容积和高度显著(p < 0.01)增加,使用 PDS 0.25 毫米或 PDS 0.5 毫米进行眼眶底部重建时过度矫正眼眶几何形状,眼眶容积和高度显著(p = 0.001)降低。补片厚度与眼眶几何形状重建率无显著差异。然而,与 PDS 0.5 毫米相比,使用 PDS 0.25 毫米可实现更高的定量重建准确性,且重建后的眼眶容积与初始容积无显著差异。
使用 PDS 可成功重建单纯骨折的眼眶底部,无论补片厚度如何,都可矫正眼眶几何形状。由于其较低的弯曲刚度,PDS 0.25 毫米似乎比 PDS 0.5 毫米提供更准确的眼眶几何形状重建,尽管在这项尸体研究中,PDS 0.25 毫米和 PDS 0.5 毫米之间的重建准确性没有显著差异。