Biochemistry Unit, Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Via Irnerio 48, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
Endodontic Clinical Section, Unit of Odontostomatological Sciences, Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Via San Vitale 59, 40136 Bologna, Italy.
Molecules. 2022 Sep 6;27(18):5750. doi: 10.3390/molecules27185750.
This study aimed to characterize the chemical properties and bioactivity of an endodontic sealer (GuttaFlow Bioseal) based on polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and containing a calcium bioglass as a doping agent. Commercial PDMS-based cement free from calcium bioglass (GuttaFlow 2 and RoekoSeal) were characterized for comparison as well as GuttaFlow 2 doped with dicalcium phosphate dihydrate, hydroxyapatite, or a tricalcium silicate-based cement. IR and Raman analyses were performed on fresh materials as well as after aging tests in Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution (28 d, 37 °C). Under these conditions, the strengthening of the 970 cm−1 Raman band and the appearance of the IR components at 1455−1414, 1015, 868, and 600−559 cm−1 revealed the deposition of B-type carbonated apatite. The Raman I970/I638 and IR A1010/A1258 ratios (markers of apatite-forming ability) showed that bioactivity decreased along with the series: GuttaFlow Bioseal > GuttaFlow 2 > RoekoSeal. The PDMS matrix played a relevant role in bioactivity; in GuttaFlow 2, the crosslinking degree was favorable for Ca2+ adsorption/complexation and the formation of a thin calcium phosphate layer. In the less crosslinked RoekoSeal, such processes did not occur. The doped cements showed bioactivity higher than GuttaFlow 2, suggesting that the particles of the mineralizing agents are spontaneously exposed on the cement surface, although the hydrophobicity of the PDMS matrix slowed down apatite deposition. Relevant properties in the endodontic practice (i.e., setting time, radiopacity, apatite-forming ability) were related to material composition and the crosslinking degree.
本研究旨在基于聚二甲基硅氧烷(PDMS)并含有钙生物玻璃作为掺杂剂来描述一种根管封闭剂(GuttaFlow Bioseal)的化学性质和生物活性。对不含钙生物玻璃的商用 PDMS 基水泥(GuttaFlow 2 和 RoekoSeal)进行了特征描述,作为对比,并对掺有二水磷酸二钙、羟基磷灰石或硅酸三钙基水泥的 GuttaFlow 2 进行了特征描述。对新鲜材料以及在 Hank's 平衡盐溶液(28d,37°C)老化试验后进行了 IR 和 Raman 分析。在这些条件下,970cm-1 Raman 带的增强以及 1455-1414、1015、868 和 600-559cm-1 处的 IR 成分的出现表明 B 型碳酸磷灰石的沉积。Raman I970/I638 和 IR A1010/A1258 比值(成骨能力的标志物)表明生物活性随着以下顺序降低:GuttaFlow Bioseal > GuttaFlow 2 > RoekoSeal。PDMS 基质在生物活性中起重要作用;在 GuttaFlow 2 中,交联度有利于 Ca2+吸附/络合和形成薄的磷酸钙层。在交联度较低的 RoekoSeal 中,不会发生这种情况。掺杂的水泥表现出高于 GuttaFlow 2 的生物活性,这表明矿化剂的颗粒在水泥表面自发暴露,尽管 PDMS 基质的疏水性减缓了磷灰石的沉积。根管治疗实践中的相关性能(即凝固时间、射线不透性、成骨能力)与材料组成和交联度有关。