Terés J, Cecilia A, Bordas J M, Rimola A, Bru C, Rodés J
Gastroenterology. 1978 Oct;75(4):566-9.
To investigate the effectiveness and safety of the Sengstaken-Blakemore (SB) tube compared with the Linton-Nachlas (LN) tube, a randomized clinical trial was carried out between both types of balloon. Seventy-nine patients suffering from gastrointestinal bleeding attributed to esophagogastric varices were included in the study. Both types of esophageal tamponade showed great effectiveness in obtaining primary hemostasis (86%), but when the bleeding was from esophageal varices, the SB tube achieved permanent hemostasis more frequently (52%) than did the LN tube (30%). In bleeding gastric varices the SB tube failed in all of the cases, but primary hemostasis was obtained with the LN tube in 50% of them. Better tolerance and greater effectiveness were obtained when the SB tube was applied without external traction. The usefulness of esophageal tamponade for bleeding varices was higher when performed within 6 hr of the onset of hemorrhage.
为研究Sengstaken-Blakemore(SB)管与Linton-Nachlas(LN)管相比的有效性和安全性,对这两种类型的球囊进行了一项随机临床试验。该研究纳入了79例因食管胃静脉曲张导致胃肠道出血的患者。两种类型的食管压迫止血法在实现初步止血方面均显示出很高的有效性(86%),但当出血来自食管静脉曲张时,SB管实现永久止血的频率(52%)高于LN管(30%)。在胃静脉曲张出血的病例中,SB管全部失败,但LN管在其中50%的病例中实现了初步止血。当SB管在无外部牵引的情况下使用时,耐受性更好且有效性更高。在出血开始后6小时内进行食管压迫止血法对静脉曲张出血的有效性更高。