Suppr超能文献

使用林顿-纳克拉斯管和森斯塔肯-布莱克莫尔管治疗食管静脉曲张出血的经验。

Experiences with the Linton-Nachlas and the Sengstaken-Blakemore tubes for bleeding esophageal varices.

作者信息

Burcharth F, Malmstrom J

出版信息

Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1976 Apr;142(4):529-31.

PMID:769201
Abstract

A controlled clinical trial was begun to compare the effectiveness of the Sengstaken-Blakemore tube with that of the Linton-Nachlas tube in the emergency treatment of bleeding esophageal varices. The investigation was prematurely terminated after two lethal complications with the Linton-Nachlas tube. At that time, 28 patients with 42 bleeding episodes were included. Twenty-seven were treated with the Sengstaken-Blakemore tube, with bleeding being controlled in 20; 15 were treated with the Linton-Nachlas tube, with bleeding being controlled in six. No significant statistical difference was found between the two tubes, 0.05 less than p less than 0.1, but the results encourage the use of Sengstaken-Blakemore tube in preference to the Linton-Nachlas tube, except in patients with a hiatal hernia or bleeding from fundic varices.

摘要

开展了一项对照临床试验,以比较Sengstaken-Blakemore管与Linton-Nachlas管在紧急治疗食管静脉曲张出血方面的有效性。在Linton-Nachlas管出现两例致命并发症后,该研究提前终止。当时,纳入了28例患者,共发生42次出血事件。27例患者使用Sengstaken-Blakemore管治疗,其中20例出血得到控制;15例患者使用Linton-Nachlas管治疗,其中6例出血得到控制。两根管子之间未发现显著统计学差异,0.05<p<0.1,但结果表明,除患有食管裂孔疝或胃底静脉曲张出血的患者外,优先使用Sengstaken-Blakemore管优于Linton-Nachlas管。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验