Language, Literature and Communication, Faculty of Humanities, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2022 Nov;13(6):e1623. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1623. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
Cognitive linguists are increasingly extending their paradigm to include the study of gestures. The bottom-up, usage-based approach in cognitive linguistics has advanced the methods for identifying gesture functions, starting from a detailed analysis of gesture forms. Theoretical notions from cognitive linguistics also help explain the means by which the forms of gestures can be interpreted as meaningful functions. Principles of conceptual metonymy explain how gestures indicate referents through the partial representation of their features that are relevant in the context of use. Conceptual metaphor theory sheds light on how abstract notions can be represented in gesture via comparison with physical source domains. Furthermore, every gestural representation inherently requires the gesturing speaker to employ a specific viewpoint for their depiction-something which is normally not expressed verbally. These aspects of gesture provide insights into processes of thinking for speaking that can be exploited in various fields of cognitive science research. Referential gestures also normally combine pragmatic and interactive functions (showing stance-taking, for example) with representational or deictic functions. The multiple functions of gesture combined with those of speech raise questions for further research about how viewing-listeners interpret and combine information from the multiple semiotic systems employed by gesturing-speakers. Finally, gesture use has been shown to correlate not only with lexical concepts but also in some ways with grammatical constructions. This gives rise to fundamental questions about what constitutes the grammar of a language. Gesture analysis thus raises issues for consideration in any research in cognitive science that concerns spoken language. This article is categorized under: Linguistics > Cognitive Linguistics > Linguistic Theory Psychology > Language.
认知语言学家越来越多地将其范式扩展到包括手势研究。认知语言学中的自下而上、基于使用的方法推进了识别手势功能的方法,从对手势形式的详细分析开始。认知语言学的理论概念也有助于解释手势形式如何被解释为有意义的功能。概念转喻原则解释了手势如何通过部分表示与使用情境相关的特征来指示指涉物。概念隐喻理论阐明了如何通过与物理源域进行比较,用手势来表示抽象概念。此外,每个手势表示都固有地要求手势说话者在其描述中采用特定的视角——这通常不是通过语言表达出来的。这些手势方面为口语思维过程提供了见解,这些见解可以在认知科学研究的各个领域中得到利用。指示性手势通常将语用和互动功能(例如表示立场)与表示或指示功能结合起来。手势和言语的多种功能结合起来,引发了关于观看听众如何解释和组合由手势说话者使用的多种符号系统提供的信息的进一步研究问题。最后,手势的使用不仅与词汇概念相关,而且在某些方面与语法结构相关。这就产生了关于构成语言语法的基本问题。因此,手势分析引发了任何涉及口语的认知科学研究都需要考虑的问题。本文属于以下分类: 语言学 > 认知语言学 > 语言理论 心理学 > 语言。