• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当手势“占据主导”:多模态互动中嵌入言语的非言语描绘

When Gesture "Takes Over": Speech-Embedded Nonverbal Depictions in Multimodal Interaction.

作者信息

Hsu Hui-Chieh, Brône Geert, Feyaerts Kurt

机构信息

Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Arts, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 11;11:552533. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.552533. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.552533
PMID:33643106
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7906077/
Abstract

The framework of depicting put forward by Clark (2016) offers a schematic vantage point from which to examine iconic language use. Confronting the framework with empirical data, we consider some of its key theoretical notions. Crucially, by reconceptualizing the typology of depictions, we identify an overlooked domain in the literature: "speech-embedded nonverbal depictions," namely cases where meaning is communicated iconically, nonverbally, and without simultaneously co-occurring speech. In addition to contextualizing the phenomenon in relation to existing research, we demonstrate, with examples from American TV talk shows, how such depictions function in real-life language use, offering a brief sketch of their complexities and arguing also for their theoretical significance.

摘要

克拉克(2016年)提出的描绘框架提供了一个示意图式的有利视角,可据此审视象似性语言的使用。通过将该框架与实证数据相对照,我们考量了其中一些关键的理论概念。至关重要的是,通过重新概念化描绘的类型学,我们识别出了文献中一个被忽视的领域:“嵌入言语的非言语描绘”,即意义通过象似性、非言语方式传达且不同时伴有言语的情况。除了将这一现象与现有研究相结合进行情境化阐释外,我们还以美国电视脱口秀节目为例,展示了此类描绘在现实语言使用中的功能,简要勾勒了其复杂性,并论证了它们的理论意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb0/7906077/936ae2f16bf9/fpsyg-11-552533-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb0/7906077/ec80f545887f/fpsyg-11-552533-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb0/7906077/53df46cefe40/fpsyg-11-552533-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb0/7906077/42d214eb391e/fpsyg-11-552533-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb0/7906077/c7424636d10c/fpsyg-11-552533-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb0/7906077/84f2d6d8ce92/fpsyg-11-552533-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb0/7906077/9a336bc5b3aa/fpsyg-11-552533-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb0/7906077/ca67cc4c1528/fpsyg-11-552533-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb0/7906077/1269aa2b34c2/fpsyg-11-552533-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb0/7906077/e0dad3d9385d/fpsyg-11-552533-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb0/7906077/b3e30065a7c8/fpsyg-11-552533-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb0/7906077/bb16f75c575f/fpsyg-11-552533-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb0/7906077/3a8339691260/fpsyg-11-552533-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb0/7906077/5d2b7c0636c3/fpsyg-11-552533-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb0/7906077/a97e6cac4bde/fpsyg-11-552533-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb0/7906077/7f252b1d2529/fpsyg-11-552533-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb0/7906077/3e92be3c3a84/fpsyg-11-552533-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb0/7906077/436b237a6cef/fpsyg-11-552533-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb0/7906077/936ae2f16bf9/fpsyg-11-552533-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb0/7906077/ec80f545887f/fpsyg-11-552533-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb0/7906077/53df46cefe40/fpsyg-11-552533-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb0/7906077/42d214eb391e/fpsyg-11-552533-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb0/7906077/c7424636d10c/fpsyg-11-552533-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb0/7906077/84f2d6d8ce92/fpsyg-11-552533-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb0/7906077/9a336bc5b3aa/fpsyg-11-552533-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb0/7906077/ca67cc4c1528/fpsyg-11-552533-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb0/7906077/1269aa2b34c2/fpsyg-11-552533-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb0/7906077/e0dad3d9385d/fpsyg-11-552533-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb0/7906077/b3e30065a7c8/fpsyg-11-552533-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb0/7906077/bb16f75c575f/fpsyg-11-552533-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb0/7906077/3a8339691260/fpsyg-11-552533-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb0/7906077/5d2b7c0636c3/fpsyg-11-552533-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb0/7906077/a97e6cac4bde/fpsyg-11-552533-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb0/7906077/7f252b1d2529/fpsyg-11-552533-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb0/7906077/3e92be3c3a84/fpsyg-11-552533-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb0/7906077/436b237a6cef/fpsyg-11-552533-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb0/7906077/936ae2f16bf9/fpsyg-11-552533-g018.jpg

相似文献

1
When Gesture "Takes Over": Speech-Embedded Nonverbal Depictions in Multimodal Interaction.当手势“占据主导”:多模态互动中嵌入言语的非言语描绘
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 11;11:552533. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.552533. eCollection 2020.
2
The development of iconicity in children's co-speech gesture and homesign.儿童伴随言语手势和家庭手语中象似性的发展。
LIA. 2017;8(1):42-68. doi: 10.1075/lia.8.1.03car. Epub 2017 Oct 2.
3
Action-Depicting Gestures and Morphosyntax: The Function of Gesture-Speech Alignment in the Conversational Turn.描绘动作的手势与形态句法:对话轮次中手势-言语对齐的功能
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 30;12:689292. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.689292. eCollection 2021.
4
Creating Images With the Stroke of a Hand: Depiction of Size and Shape in Sign Language.用手一挥创造图像:手语中大小和形状的描绘
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 31;9:1276. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01276. eCollection 2018.
5
What can iconic gestures tell us about the language system? A case of conduction aphasia.标志性手势能告诉我们语言系统的什么信息?传导性失语症案例研究。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2011 Jul-Aug;46(4):423-36. doi: 10.3109/13682822.2010.520813. Epub 2011 May 27.
6
Iconicity as Multimodal, Polysemiotic, and Plurifunctional.象似性作为多模态、多符号性和多功能性的特征。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 13;13:808896. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.808896. eCollection 2022.
7
Iconic Prosody in Story Reading.故事阅读中的标志性韵律。
Cogn Sci. 2015 Aug;39(6):1348-68. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12190. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
8
What properties of talk are associated with the generation of spontaneous iconic hand gestures?言语的哪些属性与自发的标志性手势的产生有关?
Br J Soc Psychol. 2002 Sep;41(Pt 3):403-17. doi: 10.1348/014466602760344287.
9
Multimodal Communication in Aphasia: Perception and Production of Co-speech Gestures During Face-to-Face Conversation.失语症中的多模态交流:面对面交谈中伴随言语的手势的感知与产生
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Jun 14;12:200. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00200. eCollection 2018.
10
Type of iconicity influences children's comprehension of gesture.象似性的类型会影响儿童对手势的理解。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Feb;166:327-339. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.08.009.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of gesture expressivity on emotional resonance in storytelling interaction.手势表现力对故事讲述互动中情感共鸣的影响。
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 27;15:1477263. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1477263. eCollection 2024.
2
Mocking enactments: a case study of multimodal stance-stacking.模仿表演:多模态姿态叠加的案例研究
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 2;15:1379593. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1379593. eCollection 2024.
3
How is emotional resonance achieved in storytellings of sadness/distress?在悲伤/痛苦的故事讲述中,如何实现情感共鸣?

本文引用的文献

1
Gesture and Sign: Cataclysmic Break or Dynamic Relations?手势与手语:灾难性断裂还是动态关系?
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 10;9:1651. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01651. eCollection 2018.
2
Language as Description, Indication, and Depiction.作为描述、指示和描绘的语言。
Front Psychol. 2018 May 23;9:716. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00716. eCollection 2018.
3
Demonstration and Pantomime in the Evolution of Teaching.教学演变中的示范与哑剧表演
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 29;13:952119. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.952119. eCollection 2022.
4
The study of gesture in cognitive linguistics: How it could inform and inspire other research in cognitive science.认知语言学中的手势研究:它如何为认知科学的其他研究提供信息和启示。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2022 Nov;13(6):e1623. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1623. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
5
Show Me What You've B/Seen: A Brief History of Depiction.向我展示你所经历/看到的:描绘简史。 (注:这里的“B/Seen”推测可能是“Been/Seen”的错误表述,按推测的词意翻译)
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 11;13:808814. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.808814. eCollection 2022.
6
Iconicity as Multimodal, Polysemiotic, and Plurifunctional.象似性作为多模态、多符号性和多功能性的特征。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 13;13:808896. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.808896. eCollection 2022.
Front Psychol. 2017 Mar 22;8:415. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00415. eCollection 2017.
4
How do gestures influence thinking and speaking? The gesture-for-conceptualization hypothesis.手势如何影响思维和语言?概念化手势假说。
Psychol Rev. 2017 Apr;124(3):245-266. doi: 10.1037/rev0000059. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
5
Depicting as a method of communication.描绘作为一种交流方式。
Psychol Rev. 2016 Apr;123(3):324-47. doi: 10.1037/rev0000026. Epub 2016 Feb 8.
6
Lexicalisation and de-lexicalisation processes in sign languages: Comparing depicting constructions and viewpoint gestures.手语中的词汇化和去词汇化过程:比较描述性结构和视点手势。
Lang Commun. 2012 Oct;32(4):329-348. doi: 10.1016/j.langcom.2012.09.004.
7
Iconicity as a general property of language: evidence from spoken and signed languages.象似性作为语言的普遍属性:来自口语和手语的证据。
Front Psychol. 2010 Dec 31;1:227. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00227. eCollection 2010.
8
Visible embodiment: gestures as simulated action.可见的体现:作为模拟动作的手势
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Jun;15(3):495-514. doi: 10.3758/pbr.15.3.495.
9
From monkey-like action recognition to human language: an evolutionary framework for neurolinguistics.从类猴动作识别到人类语言:神经语言学的进化框架
Behav Brain Sci. 2005 Apr;28(2):105-24; discussion 125-67. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x05000038.
10
Sign language structure: an outline of the visual communication systems of the American deaf. 1960.手语结构:美国聋人视觉通信系统概述。1960年。
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2005 Winter;10(1):3-37. doi: 10.1093/deafed/eni001.