Department of Education, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155.
Department of Biology, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155.
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2022 Dec;21(4):ar71. doi: 10.1187/cbe.21-11-0316.
Writing a lab report can be an opportunity for students to engage in scientific thinking. Yet students' lab reports often do not exhibit evidence of such engagement. Students' writing can appear focused on "filling in" required components and reporting on predetermined conclusions. We conducted a design experiment in an introductory biology laboratory course and examined the impact on students' engagement in argumentation in lab reports. Over two design iterations, students' arguments more often considered and integrated multiple claims, included a broader range of evidence and ideas, and gave appropriate attention to uncertainty in conclusions. We argue that two interrelated changes to the design of the lab course made these shifts possible. First, we restructured the role of instructors to position them as an audience interested in students' thinking. Second, we introduced more uncertainty into the lab activities to provoke consideration of multiple interpretations. We propose that these changes created a different that helped motivate and shape students' engagement in argumentation. More broadly, we suggest that an important alternative to explicitly scaffolding knowledge and skills is to design learning environments that can inspire students to engage in a range of scientific practices more authentically.
写实验报告可以为学生提供一个参与科学思考的机会。然而,学生的实验报告往往没有表现出这种参与的证据。学生的写作似乎只关注“填补”规定的部分,以及报告预先确定的结论。我们在一门基础生物学实验课程中进行了一项设计实验,研究了这对学生在实验报告中进行论证的参与度的影响。经过两轮设计迭代,学生的论证更经常考虑并整合了多个观点,包括更广泛的证据和想法,并适当关注结论中的不确定性。我们认为,实验课程设计的两个相互关联的变化使得这些转变成为可能。首先,我们重构了教师的角色,使他们成为对学生思维感兴趣的受众。其次,我们在实验活动中引入了更多的不确定性,以引发对多种解释的思考。我们认为,这些变化创造了一个不同的环境,有助于激发和塑造学生参与论证的积极性。更广泛地说,我们认为,一种替代明确传授知识和技能的重要方法是设计学习环境,以更真实地激发学生参与一系列科学实践。