• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

理解本科生论文写作者批判性思维与科学推理之间的复杂关系。

Understanding the Complex Relationship between Critical Thinking and Science Reasoning among Undergraduate Thesis Writers.

机构信息

Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708

Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708.

出版信息

CBE Life Sci Educ. 2018 Spring;17(1). doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-03-0052.

DOI:10.1187/cbe.17-03-0052
PMID:29326103
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6007780/
Abstract

Developing critical-thinking and scientific reasoning skills are core learning objectives of science education, but little empirical evidence exists regarding the interrelationships between these constructs. Writing effectively fosters students' development of these constructs, and it offers a unique window into studying how they relate. In this study of undergraduate thesis writing in biology at two universities, we examine how scientific reasoning exhibited in writing (assessed using the Biology Thesis Assessment Protocol) relates to general and specific critical-thinking skills (assessed using the California Critical Thinking Skills Test), and we consider implications for instruction. We find that scientific reasoning in writing is strongly related to , while other aspects of science reasoning that emerge in writing (epistemological considerations, writing conventions, etc.) are not significantly related to critical-thinking skills. Science reasoning in writing is not merely a proxy for critical thinking. In linking features of students' writing to their critical-thinking skills, this study 1) provides a bridge to prior work suggesting that engagement in science writing enhances critical thinking and 2) serves as a foundational step for subsequently determining whether instruction focused explicitly on developing critical-thinking skills (particularly ) can actually improve students' scientific reasoning in their writing.

摘要

培养批判性思维和科学推理技能是科学教育的核心学习目标,但关于这两个结构之间的相互关系,几乎没有实证证据。写作有效地促进了学生对这些结构的发展,并且为研究它们之间的关系提供了一个独特的窗口。在这项对两所大学生物学本科论文写作的研究中,我们研究了写作中表现出的科学推理(使用生物学论文评估协议评估)与一般和具体的批判性思维技能(使用加利福尼亚批判性思维技能测试评估)之间的关系,并考虑了对教学的影响。我们发现,写作中的科学推理与批判性思维技能密切相关,而写作中出现的其他科学推理方面(认识论考虑、写作规范等)与批判性思维技能没有显著关系。写作中的科学推理不仅仅是批判性思维的代表。通过将学生写作的特征与其批判性思维技能联系起来,本研究 1)为先前的研究提供了一个桥梁,这些研究表明参与科学写作可以提高批判性思维,2)为随后确定是否专门针对培养批判性思维技能(特别是)的教学实际上可以提高学生在写作中的科学推理能力奠定了基础。

相似文献

1
Understanding the Complex Relationship between Critical Thinking and Science Reasoning among Undergraduate Thesis Writers.理解本科生论文写作者批判性思维与科学推理之间的复杂关系。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2018 Spring;17(1). doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-03-0052.
2
Student Learning Dispositions: Multidimensional Profiles Highlight Important Differences among Undergraduate STEM Honors Thesis Writers.学生学习倾向:多维特征突出本科 STEM 荣誉论文作者之间的重要差异。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2019 Jun;18(2):ar28. doi: 10.1187/cbe.18-07-0141.
3
Want to improve undergraduate thesis writing? Engage students and their faculty readers in scientific peer review.想要提高本科生的论文写作水平吗?让学生及其教师读者参与科学同行评审。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2011 Summer;10(2):209-15. doi: 10.1187/cbe.10-10-0127.
4
Fostering critical thinking and collaborative learning skills among medical students through a research protocol writing activity in the curriculum.通过课程中的研究方案撰写活动,培养医学生的批判性思维和协作学习技能。
Korean J Med Educ. 2018 Jun;30(2):109-118. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2018.86. Epub 2018 May 30.
5
Learning to improve: using writing to increase critical thinking performance in general education biology.学会提升:通过写作提高通识教育生物学中的批判性思维能力
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2007 Summer;6(2):140-54. doi: 10.1187/cbe.06-11-0203.
6
Reflective writing in dental education to improve critical thinking and learning: A systematic review.口腔医学教育中的反思性写作以提高批判性思维和学习能力:系统评价。
J Dent Educ. 2021 Jun;85(6):778-785. doi: 10.1002/jdd.12561. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
7
Concept Maps for Improved Science Reasoning and Writing: Complexity Isn't Everything.用于提升科学推理与写作能力的概念图:复杂性并非一切。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2015 Winter;14(4):ar39. doi: 10.1187/cbe.15-06-0138.
8
Covariational reasoning and item context affect language in undergraduate mass balance written explanations.变分推理和项目语境会影响大学生在物质平衡书面解释中的语言表达。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2023 Dec 1;47(4):762-775. doi: 10.1152/advan.00156.2022. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
9
A Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience (CURE) in Biology: Developing Systems Thinking through Field Experiences in Restoration Ecology.生物学课程主导型本科生研究体验(CURE):通过恢复生态学实地经验培养系统思维。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2022 Jun;21(2):ar20. doi: 10.1187/cbe.20-12-0300.
10
Laboratory Courses with Guided-Inquiry Modules Improve Scientific Reasoning and Experimental Design Skills for the Least-Prepared Undergraduate Students.带引导式探究模块的实验室课程可提高准备最不充分的本科生的科学推理和实验设计技能。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2019 Mar;18(1):ar2. doi: 10.1187/cbe.18-08-0152.

引用本文的文献

1
Students Need More than Content Knowledge To Counter Vaccine Hesitancy.学生们需要的不仅仅是知识内容来应对疫苗犹豫问题。
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2023 Jul 13;24(2). doi: 10.1128/jmbe.00047-23. eCollection 2023 Aug.
2
Are We on the Way to Successfully Educating Future Citizens?-A Spotlight on Critical Thinking Skills and Beliefs about the Nature of Science among Pre-Service Biology Teachers in Germany.我们正在通往成功培养未来公民的道路上吗?——聚焦德国职前生物教师的批判性思维技能以及对科学本质的信念
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Mar 22;13(3):279. doi: 10.3390/bs13030279.
3
How to Develop a Grant Writing Course for Undergraduate Students.如何为本科生开设一门 Grantsmanship 写作课程。
Curr Protoc. 2023 Mar;3(3):e728. doi: 10.1002/cpz1.728.
4
A Team-Based Activity to Support Knowledge Transfer and Experimental Design Skills of Undergraduate Science Students.一项基于团队的活动,以支持本科理科学生的知识转移和实验设计技能。
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2022 May 4;23(2). doi: 10.1128/jmbe.00013-22. eCollection 2022 Aug.
5
Conspiratorial Beliefs and Cognitive Styles: An Integrated Look on Analytic Thinking, Critical Thinking, and Scientific Reasoning in Relation to (Dis)trust in Conspiracy Theories.阴谋论信念与认知风格:关于分析性思维、批判性思维和科学推理与对阴谋论的(不)信任之间关系的综合审视。
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 12;12:736838. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.736838. eCollection 2021.
6
Teaching during a pandemic: Using high-impact writing assignments to balance rigor, engagement, flexibility, and workload.疫情期间的教学:利用高影响力的写作任务平衡严谨性、参与度、灵活性和工作量。
Ecol Evol. 2020 Oct 12;10(22):12573-12580. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6776. eCollection 2020 Nov.
7
Student Learning Dispositions: Multidimensional Profiles Highlight Important Differences among Undergraduate STEM Honors Thesis Writers.学生学习倾向:多维特征突出本科 STEM 荣誉论文作者之间的重要差异。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2019 Jun;18(2):ar28. doi: 10.1187/cbe.18-07-0141.
8
Life Science Undergraduate Mentors in NE STEM 4U Significantly Outperform Their Peers in Critical Thinking Skills.生命科学本科生导师在新英格兰 STEM 4U 中的表现明显优于同龄人,在批判性思维技能方面表现出色。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2018 Dec;17(4):ar54. doi: 10.1187/cbe.18-03-0038.

本文引用的文献

1
When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions.类别变量在何时可以视为连续变量?在次优条件下稳健连续和类别 SEM 估计方法的比较。
Psychol Methods. 2012 Sep;17(3):354-73. doi: 10.1037/a0029315. Epub 2012 Jul 16.
2
Writing-to-learn in undergraduate science education: a community-based, conceptually driven approach.本科科学教育中的以写促学:一种基于社区、概念驱动的方法。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2012 Spring;11(1):17-25. doi: 10.1187/cbe.11-08-0064.
3
Want to improve undergraduate thesis writing? Engage students and their faculty readers in scientific peer review.想要提高本科生的论文写作水平吗?让学生及其教师读者参与科学同行评审。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2011 Summer;10(2):209-15. doi: 10.1187/cbe.10-10-0127.
4
Calibrated peer review for computer-assisted learning of biological research competencies.生物研究能力计算机辅助学习的校准同行评审。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2010 Sep;38(5):290-5. doi: 10.1002/bmb.20415.
5
Vision and change in biology undergraduate education, a call for action--initial responses.生物学本科教育的愿景与变革——行动呼吁——初步回应。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2010 Summer;9(2):71-3. doi: 10.1187/cbe.10-03-0044.
6
Community-based inquiry improves critical thinking in general education biology.基于社区的探究提高了通识教育生物学中的批判性思维。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2008 Fall;7(3):327-37. doi: 10.1187/cbe.07-11-0097.
7
Learning to improve: using writing to increase critical thinking performance in general education biology.学会提升:通过写作提高通识教育生物学中的批判性思维能力
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2007 Summer;6(2):140-54. doi: 10.1187/cbe.06-11-0203.
8
Introducing student inquiry in large introductory genetics classes.在大型遗传学入门课程中引入学生探究。
Genetics. 2004 Jan;166(1):11-8. doi: 10.1534/genetics.166.1.11.