Infectious Diseases Research Program, Providence Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Department of Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown Universitygrid.40263.33, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022 Oct 18;66(10):e0042622. doi: 10.1128/aac.00426-22. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
The standard of care for serious Enterococcus faecalis infections is ampicillin plus ceftriaxone. Ampicillin's inconvenient dosing schedule, drug instability, allergy potential, along with ceftriaxone's high risk for Clostridioides difficile infection and its promotion of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), led our team to explore alternative options. This work aimed to understand the role of carbapenems in combination with cephalosporins in these infections. We selected two ampicillin and penicillin susceptible E. faecalis strains (AMP-MIC 0.5-2 μg/mL; PCN-MIC 2 μg/mL) and simulated human therapeutic dosing regimens in a 48-h pharmacodynamic model (IVPD) with ampicillin (2g q4h), ertapenem (1g q24h), meropenem (2g q8h), ceftriaxone (2g q12h), and ceftaroline (600 mg q8h). As expected, ampicillin plus ceftriaxone demonstrated enhanced activity compared with ampicillin monotherapy with no MIC increases in either isolate. Meropenem and ceftaroline demonstrated significant kill against both isolates, with no regrowth or MIC increases occurring. Meropenem plus ceftriaxone also demonstrated significant kill, and while no MIC increases were identified for meropenem, there was minor regrowth and larger standard deviations. Ertapenem combined with either ceftriaxone or ceftaroline enhanced activity at 24 h, but at 48 h, regrowth occurred, and ertapenem MIC increases were noted. Meropenem-based combination therapy against E. faecalis may provide clinicians with another regimen to treat severe E. faecalis infections. Meropenem plus ceftaroline was as active as the standard of care treatment (ampicillin plus ceftriaxone) and may serve as an alternative for serious E. faecalis infections. Further studies are warranted to determine the clinical efficacy.
严重粪肠球菌感染的标准治疗方法是氨苄西林联合头孢曲松。氨苄西林不方便的给药方案、药物不稳定性、过敏潜力,以及头孢曲松对艰难梭菌感染的高风险及其对万古霉素耐药肠球菌(VRE)的促进作用,促使我们的团队探索替代方案。这项工作旨在了解碳青霉烯类药物联合头孢菌素类药物在这些感染中的作用。我们选择了两种对氨苄西林和青霉素敏感的粪肠球菌菌株(AMP-MIC 0.5-2μg/mL;PCN-MIC 2μg/mL),并在 48 小时药效动力学模型(IVPD)中模拟了人类治疗剂量方案,使用氨苄西林(2g q4h)、厄他培南(1g q24h)、美罗培南(2g q8h)、头孢曲松(2g q12h)和头孢他啶(600mg q8h)。正如预期的那样,与氨苄西林单药治疗相比,氨苄西林联合头孢曲松显示出增强的活性,两种分离株的 MIC 均未增加。美罗培南和头孢他啶对两种分离株均显示出显著的杀菌作用,没有再生长或 MIC 增加。美罗培南联合头孢曲松也显示出显著的杀菌作用,虽然美罗培南的 MIC 没有增加,但有轻微的再生长和较大的标准偏差。厄他培南与头孢曲松或头孢他啶联合使用在 24 小时时增强了活性,但在 48 小时时,出现了再生长现象,并发现厄他培南的 MIC 增加。美罗培南为基础的联合治疗可能为治疗严重粪肠球菌感染的临床医生提供另一种治疗方案。美罗培南联合头孢他啶与标准治疗(氨苄西林联合头孢曲松)一样有效,可作为严重粪肠球菌感染的替代治疗方法。需要进一步的研究来确定其临床疗效。