Egger Anthony C, Minkara Anas, Parker Richard, Rosneck James
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Garfield Heights, Ohio, USA.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Sep 19;10(9):23259671221122744. doi: 10.1177/23259671221122744. eCollection 2022 Sep.
Since the most recent epidemiologic study of injuries in National Basketball Association (NBA) players was completed in 2012, the understanding and diagnosis of intra-articular hip injury has advanced.
To report the epidemiology of intra- versus extra-articular hip injuries in NBA players with regard to missed games, risk factors for injury, and treatment types.
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
The NBA injury database was queried for all reported hip and groin injuries from 2013 to 2017. The injuries were then divided into intra-articular and extra-articular types. Variables compared between injury types included player age, NBA tenure, season schedule (preseason or offseason), onset type, injury mechanism, roster position, games missed, time to return to play, and need for surgery.
A total of 224 athletes sustaining 353 total hip pathologies were identified. Of these injuries, 216 (61.2%) were sustained during game competition and affected 156 (69.6%) of the athletes. Intra-articular injuries represented 39 (11.0%) cases and involved 36 (16.1%) players. The time to return to play was significantly longer after intra-articular versus extra-articular injury (44.6 ± 96.0 vs 11.8 ± 32.0 days; = .03), and the number of games missed was significantly greater after intra-articular versus extra-articular injury (8.0 ± 18.7 vs 1.54 ± 4.9 games; = .03). Patients with intra-articular hip injuries were more likely to undergo surgery (odds ratio, 5.5 [95% CI, 1.8-16.7]; = .005). There was no statistically significant difference in the number of games missed due to surgery (35.2 ± 8.3 [intra-articular] vs 35.4 ± 11.6 [extra-articular]; = .42) or nonoperative treatment (4.2 ± 3.4 [intra-articular] vs 1.3 ± 0.5 [extra-articular]; = .11). Years of NBA tenure were not significantly different between intra-articular and extra-articular injuries (7.1 ± 3.7 vs 6.3 ± 4.0 years). For both types of hip injury, there was no correlation between player age and either days to return to play or number of games missed ( = 0.014).
NBA players with intra-articular hip injuries underwent surgery more frequently and had a longer return-to-play time compared with those with extra-articular hip injuries. NBA tenure and player age were not correlated with the risk of developing hip injury or the need for surgery.
自2012年完成对美国职业篮球联赛(NBA)球员伤病的最新流行病学研究以来,关节内髋关节损伤的认识和诊断有了进展。
报告NBA球员关节内与关节外髋关节损伤在缺阵比赛、损伤危险因素及治疗类型方面的流行病学情况。
队列研究;证据等级,3级。
查询NBA伤病数据库中2013年至2017年所有报告的髋部和腹股沟伤病情况。然后将伤病分为关节内和关节外类型。比较不同损伤类型之间的变量包括球员年龄、NBA服役年限、赛季赛程(季前赛或休赛期)、发病类型、损伤机制、球员名单位置、缺阵比赛场次、重返赛场时间以及手术需求。
共确定了224名运动员发生了353例髋关节病变。在这些伤病中,216例(61.2%)发生在比赛期间,影响了156名(69.6%)运动员。关节内损伤占39例(11.0%),涉及36名(16.1%)球员。关节内损伤后重返赛场的时间明显长于关节外损伤(44.6±96.0天对11.8±32.0天;P = 0.03),关节内损伤后缺阵的比赛场次也明显多于关节外损伤(8.0±18.7场对1.54±4.9场;P = 0.03)。关节内髋关节损伤的患者更有可能接受手术(比值比,5.5[95%可信区间,1.8 - 16.7];P = 0.005)。因手术缺阵的比赛场次(关节内为35.2±8.3场对关节外为35.4±11.6场;P = 0.42)或非手术治疗缺阵的比赛场次(关节内为4.2±3.4场对关节外为1.3±0.5场;P = 0.11)无统计学显著差异。关节内和关节外损伤的NBA服役年限无显著差异(7.1±3.7年对6.3±4.0年)。对于两种类型的髋部损伤,球员年龄与重返赛场天数或缺阵比赛场次均无相关性(P = 0.014)。
与关节外髋关节损伤的NBA球员相比,关节内髋关节损伤的球员手术频率更高,重返赛场时间更长。NBA服役年限和球员年龄与髋部损伤风险或手术需求无关。