Li Wanmeng, Sun Xuelian, Liu Yu, Ge Meiling, Lu Ying, Liu Xiaolei, Zhou Lixing, Liu Xiaohui, Dong Biao, Yue Jirong, Xue Qianli, Dai Lunzhi, Dong Birong
National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics and Department of General Practice, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, Chengdu, China.
Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Neurogeriatrics, Karolinska Institute, Solna, Sweden.
Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Sep 7;14:977191. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.977191. eCollection 2022.
Motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR) is characterized by subjective cognitive complaints (SCCs) and slow gait (SG). Metabolomics and lipidomics may potentiate disclosure of the underlying mechanisms of MCR.
This was a cross-sectional study from the West China Health and Aging Trend cohort study (WCHAT). The operational definition of MCR is the presence of SCCs and SG without dementia or mobility disability. The test and analysis were based on untargeted metabolomics and lipidomics, consensus clustering, lasso regression and 10-fold cross-validation.
This study enrolled 6,031 individuals for clinical analysis and 577 plasma samples for omics analysis. The overall prevalence of MCR was 9.7%, and the prevalence of MCR-only, assessed cognitive impairment-only (CI-only) and MCR-CI were 7.5, 13.3, and 2.1%, respectively. By consensus clustering analysis, MCR-only was clustered into three metabolic subtypes, MCR-I, MCR-II and MCR-III. Clinically, body fat mass (OR = 0.89, CI = 0.82-0.96) was negatively correlated with MCR-I, and comorbidity (OR = 2.19, CI = 1.10-4.38) was positively correlated with MCR-III. Diabetes mellitus had the highest ORs above 1 in MCR-II and MCR-III (OR = 3.18, CI = 1.02-9.91; OR = 2.83, CI = 1.33-6.04, respectively). The risk metabolites of MCR-III showed relatively high similarity with those of cognitive impairment. Notably, L-proline, L-cystine, ADMA, and N1-acetylspermidine were significantly changed in MCR-only, and PC(40:3), SM(32:1), TG(51:3), eicosanoic acid(20:1), methyl-D-galactoside and TG(50:3) contributed most to the prediction model for MCR-III.
Pre-dementia syndrome of MCR has distinct metabolic subtypes, and SCCs and SG may cause different metabolic changes to develop MCR.
运动认知风险综合征(MCR)的特征是主观认知主诉(SCCs)和步态缓慢(SG)。代谢组学和脂质组学可能有助于揭示MCR的潜在机制。
这是一项来自华西健康与衰老趋势队列研究(WCHAT)的横断面研究。MCR的操作定义是存在SCCs和SG,且无痴呆或行动障碍。检测和分析基于非靶向代谢组学和脂质组学、共识聚类、套索回归和10折交叉验证。
本研究纳入6031名个体进行临床分析,577份血浆样本进行组学分析。MCR的总体患病率为9.7%,单纯MCR、仅评估认知障碍(仅CI)和MCR-CI的患病率分别为7.5%、13.3%和2.1%。通过共识聚类分析,单纯MCR被聚类为三种代谢亚型,MCR-I、MCR-II和MCR-III。临床上,体脂量(OR = 0.89,CI = 0.82 - 0.96)与MCR-I呈负相关,合并症(OR = 2.19,CI = 1.10 - 4.38)与MCR-III呈正相关。糖尿病在MCR-II和MCR-III中的OR最高,均大于1(分别为OR = 3.18,CI = 1.02 - 9.91;OR = 2.83,CI = 1.33 - 6.04)。MCR-III的风险代谢物与认知障碍的风险代谢物显示出相对较高的相似性。值得注意的是,L-脯氨酸、L-胱氨酸、不对称二甲基精氨酸(ADMA)和N1-乙酰亚精胺在单纯MCR中显著变化,而磷脂酰胆碱(PC(40:3))、鞘磷脂(SM(32:1))、甘油三酯(TG(51:3))、二十碳烯酸(20:1)、甲基-D-半乳糖苷和甘油三酯(TG(50:3))对MCR-III的预测模型贡献最大。
MCR的痴呆前综合征有不同的代谢亚型,SCCs和SG可能导致不同的代谢变化从而发展为MCR。