Aetion, Inc, 5 Pennsylvania Plaza, New York, NY 10001, USA.
Aetion, Inc, 5 Pennsylvania Plaza, New York, NY 10001, USA.
Vaccine. 2022 Nov 8;40(47):6730-6739. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.09.025. Epub 2022 Sep 24.
Head-to-head studies comparing COVID-19 mRNA vaccine effectiveness in immunocompromised individuals, who are vulnerable to severe disease are lacking, as large sample sizes are required to make meaningful inferences.
This observational comparative effectiveness study was conducted in closed administrative claims data from the US HealthVerity database (December 11, 2020-January 10, 2022, before omicron). A 2-dose mRNA-1273 versus BNT162b2 regimen was assessed for preventing medically-attended breakthrough COVID-19 diagnosis and hospitalizations among immunocompromised adults. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to balance baseline characteristics between vaccine groups. Incidence rates from patient-level data and hazard ratios (HRs) using weighted Cox proportional hazards models were calculated.
Overall, 57,898 and 66,981 individuals received a 2-dose regimen of mRNA-1273 or BNT161b2, respectively. Among the weighted population, mean age was 51 years, 53 % were female, and baseline immunodeficiencies included prior blood transplant (8%-9%), prior organ transplant (7%), active cancer (12%-13%), primary immunodeficiency (5-6%), HIV (20%-21%), and immunosuppressive therapy use (60%-61%). Rates per 1,000 person-years (PYs; 95% confidence intervals [CI]s) of breakthrough medically-attended COVID-19 were 25.82 (23.83-27.97) with mRNA-1273 and 30.98 (28.93, 33.18) with BNT162b2 (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.75-0.93). When requiring evidence of an antigen or polymerase chain reaction test before COVID-19 diagnosis, the HR for medically-attended COVID-19 was 0.78 (0.67-0.92). Breakthrough COVID-19 hospitalization rates per 1,000 PYs (95% CI) were 3.66 (2.96-4.51) for mRNA-1273 and 4.68 (3.91-5.59) for BNT162b2 (HR, 0.78; 0.59-1.03). Utilizing open and closed claims for outcome capture only, or both cohort entry/outcome capture, produced HRs (95% CIs) for COVID-19 hospitalization of 0.72 (0.57-0.92) and 0.66 (0.58-0.76), respectively.
Among immunocompromised adults, a 2-dose mRNA-1273 regimen was more effective in preventing medically-attended COVID-19 in any setting (inpatient and outpatient) than 2-dose BNT162b2. Results were similar for COVID-19 hospitalization, although statistical power was limited when using closed claims only.
NCT05366322.
在免疫功能低下的个体中,缺乏比较 COVID-19 mRNA 疫苗有效性的头对头研究,因为需要大样本量才能得出有意义的推论。
本观察性比较有效性研究在来自美国 HealthVerity 数据库的封闭行政索赔数据中进行(2020 年 12 月 11 日至 2022 年 1 月 10 日,在 omicron 之前)。评估了两剂 mRNA-1273 与 BNT162b2 方案在预防免疫功能低下的成年人中出现有医疗记录的突破性 COVID-19 诊断和住院方面的效果。采用逆概率治疗加权法在疫苗组之间平衡基线特征。使用加权 Cox 比例风险模型计算患者水平数据的发病率和风险比(HRs)。
总体而言,分别有 57898 人和 66981 人接受了两剂 mRNA-1273 或 BNT161b2 方案。在加权人群中,平均年龄为 51 岁,53%为女性,基线免疫缺陷包括既往血液移植(8%-9%)、既往器官移植(7%)、活动性癌症(12%-13%)、原发性免疫缺陷(5-6%)、HIV(20%-21%)和免疫抑制治疗使用(60%-61%)。每 1000 人年(95%置信区间[CI])出现有医疗记录的突破性 COVID-19 的发生率分别为 mRNA-1273 组为 25.82(23.83-27.97),BNT162b2 组为 30.98(28.93,33.18)(HR,0.83;95%CI,0.75-0.93)。当需要在 COVID-19 诊断前有抗原或聚合酶链反应检测证据时,有医疗记录的 COVID-19 的 HR 为 0.78(0.67-0.92)。每 1000 人年(95%CI)突破性 COVID-19 住院率分别为 mRNA-1273 组 3.66(2.96-4.51)和 BNT162b2 组 4.68(3.91-5.59)(HR,0.78;0.59-1.03)。仅使用开放和封闭索赔来捕获结果,或同时使用队列进入/结果捕获,COVID-19 住院的 HR(95%CI)分别为 0.72(0.57-0.92)和 0.66(0.58-0.76)。
在免疫功能低下的成年人中,与两剂 BNT162b2 相比,两剂 mRNA-1273 方案在任何情况下(住院和门诊)预防有医疗记录的 COVID-19 都更有效。COVID-19 住院的结果相似,尽管仅使用封闭索赔时统计能力有限。
NCT05366322。