Ibrahim Sufyan, Udupi Anurupa, Rebeiro Cleeta, Bolar Suryakanth Varashree, Kamath Asha, Panduranga Shenoy Revathi
Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Department of Biochemistry, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Rep Biochem Mol Biol. 2022 Jul;11(2):350-357. doi: 10.52547/rbmb.11.2.350.
Globally, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of death and disability. Elevated low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) and more specifically, elevation of its small, dense phenotype (sdLDL-C) has been regarded as the key modifiable risk factors associated with atherogenesis. This study aimed to determine the association of LDL-C and sdLDL-C with the development of CVDs in the next six months to establish their predictive efficacy.
A batch of 162 anonymized serum samples sent for analysis of lipid profile parameters, were classified into tests and controls based on the calculated LDL-C values obtained by Fried Ewald formula. Direct LDL-C was also estimated automatically using assay kits. Using the formula provided by Srisawasdi et al., sdLDL-C was then computed for all samples. Six months later, samples were deanonymized, and the lipid profiles were compared with cardiovascular outcomes of these patients, to determine which parameter had the greatest correlation.
Four control group patients and three test group patients developed the outcome (any cardiovascular event) during the 6-month follow-up period. Binary logistic regression analysis showed that none of the lipid profile parameters: calculated LDL-C (OR= 0.99; 95% CI= 0.97-1.01; p= 0.826), direct LDL-C (OR= 0.99; 95% CI= 0.97-1.01; p= 0.818) or sdLDL-C (OR= 0.99; 95% CI= 0.93-1.04; p= 0.734), were significantly associated with the occurrence of outcome. The median % sdLDL-C both with respect to direct and calculated LDL-C was slightly higher in patients with the outcome.
The levels of LDL-C or its individual phenotypes may not be used singly as indicator of cardiovascular morbidity in the next six months.
在全球范围内,心血管疾病(CVDs)是导致死亡和残疾的主要原因。低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)升高,更具体地说,其小而密的表型(sdLDL-C)升高,被认为是与动脉粥样硬化发生相关的关键可改变危险因素。本研究旨在确定LDL-C和sdLDL-C与未来六个月内CVDs发生之间的关联,以确定它们的预测效力。
一批送去分析血脂谱参数的162份匿名血清样本,根据Fried Ewald公式计算得到的LDL-C值分为测试组和对照组。还使用检测试剂盒自动估算直接LDL-C。然后使用Srisawasdi等人提供的公式计算所有样本的sdLDL-C。六个月后,对样本进行去匿名化处理,并将血脂谱与这些患者的心血管结局进行比较,以确定哪个参数具有最大相关性。
在6个月的随访期内,4名对照组患者和3名测试组患者出现了结局(任何心血管事件)。二元逻辑回归分析表明,血脂谱参数中,计算得到的LDL-C(比值比=0.99;95%置信区间=0.97-1.01;p=0.826)、直接LDL-C(比值比=0.99;95%置信区间=0.97-1.01;p=0.818)或sdLDL-C(比值比=0.99;95%置信区间=0.93-1.04;p=0.734),均与结局的发生无显著关联。出现结局的患者中,相对于直接LDL-C和计算得到的LDL-C,sdLDL-C的中位数百分比略高。
LDL-C水平或其个体表型可能不能单独用作未来六个月内心血管疾病发病率的指标。