Deitelzweig Steven, Terasawa Emi, Kang Amiee, Atreja Nipun, Hines Dionne M, Noman Ahmed, Luo Xuemei
Ochsner Clinic Foundation, Department of Hospital Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Ochsner Clinical School, The University of Queensland School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2022 Nov;38(11):1885-1890. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2022.2128189. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
In recent years, US payers have increased usage of formulary exclusions as a means to help manage costs. Earlier this year, one of the largest pharmacy benefit managers in the country added Eliquis (apixaban), the most widely used anticoagulant, to its list of excluded medicines from its formulary, raising concerns by physicians and patients. In this commentary, we examine the potential impacts of formulary exclusion of a drug like apixaban-a treatment for patients with atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism to help prevent stroke and clotting events and which has been demonstrated to have a strong efficacy and safety profile. We discuss the effect of formulary exclusions on patients' ability to access the most clinically appropriate treatment for their health needs, along with possible effects on their health and well-being. We also report descriptive results on apixaban-treated patients with traditional Medicare coverage who faced a formulary exclusion of apixaban in 2017, and these patients' observed behaviors. We found that the majority of these patients remained on apixaban either through pre-emptively switching to a different Part D drug plan with apixaban coverage or applying for formulary exception. Our findings suggest that formulary exclusion did not help to achieve the goal of switching patients to less costly medications but created additional hurdles for patients to access their preferred treatment and increased patient burden. Alternative ways to manage payer costs may be needed to help avoid poor outcomes and reduce the burden placed on patients in their efforts to access life-saving medications.
近年来,美国医保支付方增加了药品目录排除条款的使用,以此作为控制成本的一种手段。今年早些时候,美国最大的药品福利管理公司之一将最常用的抗凝血剂艾乐妥(阿哌沙班)列入其药品目录的排除药品清单,这引发了医生和患者的担忧。在这篇评论文章中,我们研究了将阿哌沙班这类药物排除在药品目录之外的潜在影响。阿哌沙班用于治疗心房颤动和静脉血栓栓塞患者,以帮助预防中风和凝血事件,并且已被证明具有强大的疗效和安全性。我们讨论了药品目录排除条款对患者获得最适合其健康需求的临床治疗的能力的影响,以及对他们的健康和福祉可能产生的影响。我们还报告了2017年面临阿哌沙班被排除在药品目录之外的传统医疗保险覆盖的阿哌沙班治疗患者的描述性结果,以及这些患者的观察到的行为。我们发现,这些患者中的大多数要么通过预先转投涵盖阿哌沙班的不同D部分药物计划,要么申请药品目录例外,从而继续使用阿哌沙班。我们的研究结果表明,药品目录排除条款无助于实现让患者改用成本更低药物的目标,反而给患者获得他们首选的治疗带来了额外障碍,并增加了患者负担。可能需要采取其他方法来管理医保支付方的成本,以帮助避免不良后果,并减轻患者在获取救命药物过程中所承受的负担。