School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.
Western Investment Limited Company of China Construction Third Engineering Bureau, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 27;17(9):e0275157. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275157. eCollection 2022.
Indoor air pollution is complex and serious. In fact, an on-site investigation of an office building revealed that the concentration of three typical pollutants (CO2, VOCs, PM2.5) exceeded the Chinese standard. To identify a better control method to achieve good indoor air quality, an orthogonal experiment was carried out in an environmental chamber to compare the control time and energy consumption of four control methods (purifier+ and window+, purifier+ and window-, purified fresh air 240 m3/h and purified fresh air 400 m3/h) to meet the standard established for pollutants. The purifier+ and window+ method was found to be more effective in most conditions, with a control time reduced by 8.06% and energy consumption reduced by 11.91% compared with the traditional control method of purified fresh air 240 m3/h. This research highlights the optimal control strategy for the air quality in office buildings under different pollution conditions.
室内空气污染复杂且严重。事实上,对一栋办公楼的现场调查显示,三种典型污染物(CO2、VOCs、PM2.5)的浓度均超过了中国的标准。为了确定更好的控制方法以实现良好的室内空气质量,在环境舱中进行了正交实验,比较了四种控制方法(净化器+和开窗+、净化器+和开窗-、240m3/h 净化新风量和 400m3/h 净化新风量)达到为污染物设定的标准时的控制时间和能耗。在大多数情况下,发现净化器+和开窗+方法更有效,与传统的 240m3/h 净化新风量控制方法相比,控制时间减少了 8.06%,能耗减少了 11.91%。这项研究突出了在不同污染条件下优化办公建筑空气质量的控制策略。