• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

失语症患者对使用文本转语音技术支持阅读的看法:一项汇聚的混合方法研究。

Perceptions of people with aphasia about supporting reading with text-to-speech technology: A convergent mixed methods study.

机构信息

Quality Living, Inc., Psychology Dept., Omaha, NE, United States.

Duquesne University, Dept. of Speech-language Pathology, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.

出版信息

J Commun Disord. 2021 May-Jun;91:106098. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2021.106098. Epub 2021 Mar 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2021.106098
PMID:33744768
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8178192/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Text-to-speech (TTS) technology is a possible reading support for people with aphasia; however, adoption for functional reading remains rare, and people with aphasia may have limited knowledge about TTS. Given this situation coupled with inherent communication challenges associated with aphasia, the purpose of this convergent mixed methods study was to explore the perceptions of participants about desired features, benefits, and drawbacks of TTS technology after having engaged in one-on-one education and guided practice activities.

METHODS

Nineteen adults with chronic aphasia completed a single education and guided practice session followed by close-ended questions and participation in a semi-structured interview to explain preferences, concerns, beliefs, and opinions about potential TTS technology benefits and drawbacks. Three participants had previously used TTS technology for functional reading; all others had some prior exposure but did not use a system for functional purposes.

RESULTS

Seventeen of 19 participants expressed TTS technology interest after education and guided practice activities. Participants endorsed selection of a preferred voice, control of speech output rate, and highlighting as priority features. Frequently endorsed benefits were improved comprehension and increased reading independence; some participants believed they would succeed in reading a greater variety of materials, communicate more with others, participate in more reading activities, and/or read faster. The greatest concern was mastering device operation; other concerns related to understanding the voice output, needing another person's help for system use, and matching the speech output rate to a preferred reading rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, most participants had positive perceptions about possible benefits afforded by TTS technology. Practitioners need to provide opportunities for people with aphasia to learn about and explore TTS systems to determine whether adoption is desired.

摘要

简介

文本转语音(TTS)技术可能是失语症患者的一种阅读支持方式;然而,其在功能性阅读中的应用仍然很少,而且失语症患者可能对 TTS 技术知之甚少。鉴于这种情况,再加上与失语症相关的固有沟通挑战,本融合混合方法研究的目的是探索参与者在接受一对一的教育和引导实践活动后对 TTS 技术的期望特征、益处和缺点的看法。

方法

19 名患有慢性失语症的成年人完成了一次教育和引导实践课程,随后回答了一些封闭式问题,并参加了半结构化访谈,以解释他们对潜在 TTS 技术益处和缺点的偏好、关注、信念和意见。其中 3 名参与者之前曾使用 TTS 技术进行功能性阅读;其余所有人都有过一些先前的接触,但没有将系统用于功能性目的。

结果

在教育和引导实践活动后,19 名参与者中有 17 名表示对 TTS 技术感兴趣。参与者表示选择喜欢的声音、控制语音输出速度和突出显示是优先考虑的功能。经常被认可的益处包括提高理解能力和增加阅读独立性;一些参与者认为他们将能够阅读更多种类的材料、与他人更多地交流、更多地参与阅读活动和/或更快地阅读。最大的担忧是掌握设备操作;其他担忧涉及理解语音输出、系统使用需要他人帮助以及将语音输出速度与首选阅读速度匹配。

结论

总体而言,大多数参与者对 TTS 技术可能带来的益处持积极看法。从业者需要为失语症患者提供了解和探索 TTS 系统的机会,以确定是否需要采用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9168/8178192/f718377037bc/nihms-1683163-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9168/8178192/24fd9208a8d0/nihms-1683163-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9168/8178192/12906ce841b2/nihms-1683163-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9168/8178192/b08a7f48a8c6/nihms-1683163-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9168/8178192/f718377037bc/nihms-1683163-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9168/8178192/24fd9208a8d0/nihms-1683163-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9168/8178192/12906ce841b2/nihms-1683163-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9168/8178192/b08a7f48a8c6/nihms-1683163-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9168/8178192/f718377037bc/nihms-1683163-f0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Perceptions of people with aphasia about supporting reading with text-to-speech technology: A convergent mixed methods study.失语症患者对使用文本转语音技术支持阅读的看法:一项汇聚的混合方法研究。
J Commun Disord. 2021 May-Jun;91:106098. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2021.106098. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
2
Reading behaviors and text-to-speech technology perceptions of people with aphasia.失语症患者的阅读行为和文本转语音技术感知。
Assist Technol. 2022 Sep 3;34(5):599-610. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2021.1904306. Epub 2021 May 3.
3
Reading Comprehension and Processing Time When People With Aphasia Use Text-to-Speech Technology With Personalized Supports and Features.失语症患者使用具有个性化支持和功能的语音合成技术时的阅读理解和处理时间。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2022 Jan 18;31(1):342-358. doi: 10.1044/2021_AJSLP-21-00182. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
4
A Mixed-Methods Exploration of the Experience of People With Aphasia Using Text-to-Speech Technology to Support Virtual Book Club Participation.使用语音合成技术支持虚拟读书俱乐部参与的失语症患者体验的混合方法探索。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023 Nov 6;32(6):2768-2791. doi: 10.1044/2023_AJSLP-23-00094. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
5
Effect of Digital Highlighting on Reading Comprehension Given Text-to-Speech Technology for People with Aphasia.数字高亮对失语症患者使用文本转语音技术时阅读理解的影响。
Aphasiology. 2021;35(2):200-221. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2020.1787728. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
6
Comprehension, Processing Time, and Modality Preferences When People With Aphasia and Neurotypical Healthy Adults Read Books: A Pilot Study.失语症患者和神经典型健康成年人阅读书籍时的理解、处理时间和模态偏好:一项初步研究。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2022 Nov 16;31(6):2569-2590. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJSLP-22-00121. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
7
Modality Synchronization When People With Aphasia Read With Text-to-Speech Support.当失语症患者使用语音合成器阅读时的模态同步。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2024 May;33(3):1504-1512. doi: 10.1044/2024_AJSLP-23-00334. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
8
Can a writing intervention using mainstream Assistive Technology software compensate for dysgraphia and support reading comprehension for people with aphasia?使用主流辅助技术软件进行写作干预能否补偿失写症并支持失语症患者的阅读理解?
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 May-Jun;59(3):1090-1109. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12975. Epub 2023 Nov 15.
9
Impact of text-to-speech features on the reading comprehension of children with reading and language difficulties.文本转语音功能对阅读和语言障碍儿童阅读理解的影响。
Ann Dyslexia. 2023 Oct;73(3):469-486. doi: 10.1007/s11881-023-00281-9. Epub 2023 Apr 29.
10
Eye Fixation Behaviors and Processing Time of People With Aphasia and Neurotypical Adults When Reading Narratives With and Without Text-to-Speech Support.失语症患者和神经典型成年人在有和没有文本转语音支持的情况下阅读叙事文时的眼动注视行为和处理时间。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 Jan 12;66(1):276-295. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00298. Epub 2022 Dec 20.

引用本文的文献

1
A Mixed-Methods Exploration of the Experience of People With Aphasia Using Text-to-Speech Technology to Support Virtual Book Club Participation.使用语音合成技术支持虚拟读书俱乐部参与的失语症患者体验的混合方法探索。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023 Nov 6;32(6):2768-2791. doi: 10.1044/2023_AJSLP-23-00094. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
2
Comprehension, Processing Time, and Modality Preferences When People With Aphasia and Neurotypical Healthy Adults Read Books: A Pilot Study.失语症患者和神经典型健康成年人阅读书籍时的理解、处理时间和模态偏好:一项初步研究。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2022 Nov 16;31(6):2569-2590. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJSLP-22-00121. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of Digital Highlighting on Reading Comprehension Given Text-to-Speech Technology for People with Aphasia.数字高亮对失语症患者使用文本转语音技术时阅读理解的影响。
Aphasiology. 2021;35(2):200-221. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2020.1787728. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
2
Effect of Text-to-Speech Rate on Reading Comprehension by Adults With Aphasia.语音语速对成人失语症患者阅读理解的影响。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020 Feb 7;29(1):168-184. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-19-00047. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
3
Effects of Written, Auditory, and Combined Modalities on Comprehension by People With Aphasia.
Lateral Multimodal Learning in a Saudi EFL Context: Investigating the Perceptions of Teachers and M2E Female Learners.
沙特 EFL 环境中的横向多模态学习:调查教师和 M2E 女性学习者的看法。
F1000Res. 2022 Mar 30;11:369. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.109454.1. eCollection 2022.
4
Reading Comprehension and Processing Time When People With Aphasia Use Text-to-Speech Technology With Personalized Supports and Features.失语症患者使用具有个性化支持和功能的语音合成技术时的阅读理解和处理时间。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2022 Jan 18;31(1):342-358. doi: 10.1044/2021_AJSLP-21-00182. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
书面、听觉和组合模态对失语症患者理解的影响。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Aug 9;28(3):1206-1221. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-19-0013. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
4
Comprehension of Single Versus Combined Modality Information by People With Aphasia.失语症患者对单一模态与联合模态信息的理解。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Mar 11;28(1S):278-292. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0132.
5
The effects of two assistive technologies on reading comprehension accuracy and rate.两种辅助技术对阅读理解准确性和速度的影响。
Assist Technol. 2019;31(4):220-230. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2018.1431974. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
6
Comprehension of synthetic speech and digitized natural speech by adults with aphasia.失语症成年人对合成语音和数字化自然语音的理解
J Commun Disord. 2017 Sep;69:15-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2017.06.006. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
7
Aphasia and literacy-the insider's perspective.失语症与读写能力——业内人士的观点。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2017 Sep;52(5):573-584. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12302. Epub 2016 Dec 31.
8
Older people, assistive technologies, and the barriers to adoption: A systematic review.老年人、辅助技术与采用障碍:一项系统综述
Int J Med Inform. 2016 Oct;94:112-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.07.004. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
9
Experiences of participation in goal setting for people with stroke-induced aphasia in Norway. A qualitative study.挪威中风后失语症患者参与目标设定的经历。一项定性研究。
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Jun;39(11):1122-1130. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1185167. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
10
“Nothing About Us Without Us”: Toward Patient- and Family-Centered Care.“没有我们的参与就没有关于我们的决策”:迈向以患者和家庭为中心的医疗照护。
AMA J Ethics. 2016 Jan;18(1):3-5.