• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应用集成机器学习模型预测个体对数字化传递的担忧推迟干预的反应。

Applying ensemble machine learning models to predict individual response to a digitally delivered worry postponement intervention.

机构信息

Center for Technology and Behavioral Health, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, United States; Mathematical Data Science Program, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, United States.

Center for Technology and Behavioral Health, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, United States; Quantitative Biomedical Sciences Program, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, United States.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2023 Jan 1;320:201-210. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.09.112. Epub 2022 Sep 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2022.09.112
PMID:36167247
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10037342/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is a prevalent mental health disorder that often goes untreated. A core aspect of GAD is worry, which is associated with negative health outcomes, accentuating a need for simple treatments for worry. The present study leveraged pretreatment individual differences to predict personalized treatment response to a digital intervention.

METHODS

Linear mixed-effect models were used to model changes in daytime and nighttime worry duration and frequency for 163 participants who completed a six-day worry postponement intervention. Ensemble-based machine learning regression and classification models were implemented to predict changes in worry across the intervention. Model feature importance was derived using SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP).

RESULTS

Moderate predictive performance was obtained for predicting changes in daytime worry duration (test r = 0.221, AUC = 0.77) and nighttime worry frequency (test r = 0.164, AUC = 0.72), while poor predictive performance was obtained for nighttime worry duration and daytime worry frequency. Baseline levels of worry and subjective health complaints were most important in driving model predictions.

LIMITATIONS

A complete-case analysis was leveraged to analyze the present data, which was collected from participants that were Dutch and majority female.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that treatment response to a digital intervention for GAD can be accurately predicted using baseline characteristics. Particularly, this worry postponement intervention may be most beneficial for individuals with high baseline worry but fewer subjective health complaints. The present findings highlight the complexities of and need for further research into daily worry dynamics and the personalizable utility of digital interventions.

摘要

目的

广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)是一种普遍存在的心理健康障碍,往往得不到治疗。GAD 的一个核心方面是担忧,它与负面健康结果有关,因此需要对担忧进行简单的治疗。本研究利用治疗前的个体差异来预测数字干预对个性化治疗的反应。

方法

线性混合效应模型用于对 163 名完成六天担忧推迟干预的参与者的日间和夜间担忧持续时间和频率的变化进行建模。实施基于集成的机器学习回归和分类模型来预测干预过程中担忧的变化。使用 SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) 推导出模型特征重要性。

结果

对于预测日间担忧持续时间(测试 r=0.221,AUC=0.77)和夜间担忧频率(测试 r=0.164,AUC=0.72)的变化,获得了中等的预测性能,而对于夜间担忧持续时间和日间担忧频率的变化,获得了较差的预测性能。担忧和主观健康抱怨的基线水平对驱动模型预测最重要。

局限性

本研究利用完整案例分析来分析从荷兰和女性居多的参与者那里收集的数据,这可能会导致偏差。

结论

这项研究表明,使用基线特征可以准确预测 GAD 的数字干预治疗反应。特别是,这种担忧推迟干预可能对基线担忧较高但主观健康抱怨较少的个体最有益。本研究结果强调了进一步研究日常担忧动态和数字干预个性化效用的复杂性和必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa19/10037342/bf7fd2b31b91/nihms-1876740-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa19/10037342/c204c1721e7c/nihms-1876740-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa19/10037342/bf7fd2b31b91/nihms-1876740-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa19/10037342/c204c1721e7c/nihms-1876740-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa19/10037342/bf7fd2b31b91/nihms-1876740-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Applying ensemble machine learning models to predict individual response to a digitally delivered worry postponement intervention.应用集成机器学习模型预测个体对数字化传递的担忧推迟干预的反应。
J Affect Disord. 2023 Jan 1;320:201-210. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.09.112. Epub 2022 Sep 24.
2
Reducing worry and subjective health complaints: A randomized trial of an internet-delivered worry postponement intervention.减少担忧和主观健康投诉:一项互联网传递的担忧推迟干预的随机试验。
Br J Health Psychol. 2016 May;21(2):318-35. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12170. Epub 2015 Oct 29.
3
Savoring, worry, and positive emotion duration in generalized anxiety disorder: Assessment and interventional experiment.广泛性焦虑障碍中的品味、担忧和积极情绪持续时间:评估和干预实验。
J Anxiety Disord. 2023 Jun;97:102724. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2023.102724. Epub 2023 May 12.
4
Self-conscious emotions in worry and generalized anxiety disorder.担忧和广泛性焦虑障碍中的自我意识情绪。
Br J Clin Psychol. 2014 Sep;53(3):299-314. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12047. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
5
Internet-delivered interpretation training reduces worry and anxiety in individuals with generalized anxiety disorder: A randomized controlled experiment.互联网提供的口译训练可减轻广泛性焦虑症患者的担忧和焦虑:一项随机对照实验。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2021 Jul;89(7):575-589. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000660.
6
Rethinking the role of worry in generalized anxiety disorder: evidence supporting a model of emotional contrast avoidance.重新思考担忧在广泛性焦虑障碍中的作用:支持情绪对比回避模型的证据。
Behav Ther. 2014 May;45(3):283-99. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2013.12.011. Epub 2014 Jan 3.
7
Clinical Efficacy and Psychological Mechanisms of an App-Based Digital Therapeutic for Generalized Anxiety Disorder: Randomized Controlled Trial.基于应用程序的数字疗法治疗广泛性焦虑障碍的临床疗效及心理机制:随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 2;23(12):e26987. doi: 10.2196/26987.
8
Telephone-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Telephone-Delivered Nondirective Supportive Therapy for Rural Older Adults With Generalized Anxiety Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.针对患有广泛性焦虑症的农村老年人的电话认知行为疗法和电话非指导性支持性疗法:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2015 Oct;72(10):1012-20. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.1154.
9
Which client with generalized anxiety disorder benefits from a mindfulness ecological momentary intervention versus a self-monitoring app? Developing a multivariable machine learning predictive model.哪种广泛性焦虑障碍患者从正念生态瞬间干预中获益,而不是自我监测应用程序?开发多变量机器学习预测模型。
J Anxiety Disord. 2024 Mar;102:102825. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2024.102825. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
10
Basic processes and clinical applications of mental imagery in worry: A systematic review.担忧中心理意象的基本过程和临床应用:系统评价。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2024 Jun;110:102427. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102427. Epub 2024 Apr 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a machine learning-based multivariable prediction model for the naturalistic course of generalized anxiety disorder.基于机器学习的广泛性焦虑症自然病程多变量预测模型的开发。
J Anxiety Disord. 2025 Mar;110:102978. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2025.102978. Epub 2025 Jan 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting therapy outcome in a digital mental health intervention for depression and anxiety: A machine learning approach.预测针对抑郁和焦虑的数字心理健康干预的治疗效果:一种机器学习方法。
Digit Health. 2021 Nov 29;7:20552076211060659. doi: 10.1177/20552076211060659. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
2
Using Smartphone App Use and Lagged-Ensemble Machine Learning for the Prediction of Work Fatigue and Boredom.利用智能手机应用程序使用情况和滞后集成机器学习预测工作疲劳和无聊感。
Comput Human Behav. 2022 Feb;127. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.107029. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
3
Health effects of psychological interventions for worry and rumination: A meta-analysis.
针对担忧和反复思考的心理干预对健康的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Health Psychol. 2021 Sep;40(9):617-630. doi: 10.1037/hea0000985. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
4
Predicting acute suicidal ideation on Instagram using ensemble machine learning models.使用集成机器学习模型预测Instagram上的急性自杀意念。
Internet Interv. 2021 Jul 6;25:100424. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100424. eCollection 2021 Sep.
5
Internet-delivered interpretation training reduces worry and anxiety in individuals with generalized anxiety disorder: A randomized controlled experiment.互联网提供的口译训练可减轻广泛性焦虑症患者的担忧和焦虑:一项随机对照实验。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2021 Jul;89(7):575-589. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000660.
6
Associations between mental health shortage areas and county-level suicide rates among adults aged 25 and older in the USA, 2010 to 2018.美国 2010 至 2018 年 25 岁及以上成年人心理健康短缺地区与县级自杀率的相关性。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2021 May-Jun;70:44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2021.02.001. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
7
Predictive modeling of depression and anxiety using electronic health records and a novel machine learning approach with artificial intelligence.使用电子健康记录和人工智能的新型机器学习方法预测抑郁和焦虑。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 21;11(1):1980. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81368-4.
8
Using Artificial Intelligence to Predict Change in Depression and Anxiety Symptoms in a Digital Intervention: Evidence from a Transdiagnostic Randomized Controlled Trial.利用人工智能预测数字干预中抑郁和焦虑症状的变化:来自跨诊断随机对照试验的证据。
Psychiatry Res. 2021 Jan;295:113618. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113618. Epub 2020 Nov 29.
9
Array programming with NumPy.使用 NumPy 进行数组编程。
Nature. 2020 Sep;585(7825):357-362. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
10
Psychometric and machine learning approaches for diagnostic assessment and tests of individual classification.用于诊断评估和个体分类测试的心理测量与机器学习方法。
Psychol Methods. 2021 Apr;26(2):236-254. doi: 10.1037/met0000317. Epub 2020 Jul 2.